|
|
Post by swamicollins on Nov 17, 2008 1:44:11 GMT -5
Peter-you are a CRIMINAL-by displaying my FORMER ADDRESS the ONLY way you could have got that is by breaking into the Main Yahoo computer and that is CRIMINAL under the Data Protection Act-so I have reported you to Yahoo and they have responded by telling me in an E that they have informed the Police and that they intend to prosecute you-
so apart from posing as a neo-NEO in yer long black coat and dark glasses and "enigmatic save the world look" you CANNOT RESPECT OTHERS RIGHTS TO PRIVACY-
I have not lived in Col
pmanthorpe for nearly three years now and the current address on Yahoo is false.I did this because of SLIME like you
|
|
sophia
Full Member
...the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light. ~Plato
Posts: 146
|
Post by sophia on Nov 17, 2008 2:25:17 GMT -5
Swami, Relax, Love. Do not let paranoia overwhelm you. Peter did not break into your computer or Yahoo's computer. He has managed to push your emotional buttons though by doing a simple little trick. Everyone can do this trick. You can do this trick. I am sure there are several explanations for how Peter knew of your former town. Either it was a lucky guess or he did a look-up on your IP address. OR perhaps you have said somewhere on the Internet where you live. Each computer has its own unique IP number, much like you have your own fingerprint. If you look at some of the email messages I sent you, you will find an IP address from my computer. If you do a WHOIS search you will find my location. Every email has a header and you can find this information in the header. Try it. Open up one of the emails I had sent to you in your Yahoo account. In the bottom right-hand corner there is a link that says "Full Headers". You will see a funny number beside "Received", like this: "Received: from [74.130.X.X] by web37105.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 16 Nov 2008 23:02:31 PST" Now, I have put an X in place of two numbers but if you look you will see my IP number. You can find out where I live by doing an IP Look-up. Someone may be able to narrow down what town you live/lived in, but as far as I know there is no way for any one to find out exactly which house you live in. You'd have to be the actual Internet Provider to know this. Personally, if you're that worried about it, I would recommend getting a gmail account, because I don't think gmail gives out your IP when you send emails. If you want to know more, please email me. It is now more clear to me than ever that there is something going on with you. I'm tempted to call it paranoid schizophrenia but no matter what it is I want you to feel safe. I am certain you are in a safe place on this forum. You may tick everyone off with your antics but I think every one really cares about you. If you are a "crazy", so what.... so am I! I care about you. I know you'll ridicule me for this, but that's just you being you. I'm a big girl and I can take it.  |
|
|
|
Post by swamicollins on Nov 17, 2008 3:26:32 GMT -5
YOU(hiding behind the Conditioned Identity of someone who doesnt exist--SOPHIA)
Whatever explanation you can come up with to defend the DELUDED HUMAN SLIME called "Peter the Spoon that doesnt exist" the fact is that he has invaded my PRIVACY--that ,to me, is UNFORGIVEABLE!!--Never "mind" that he is an inadequate masturbator and fantasises like ALL computer ADDICTS--He is HUMAN SLIME for invading my PRIVACY and posting my previous address and that is UNFORGIVEABLE
You can say whatever you like about me--I cant stop you-I will not refute your charges of "paranoid Schitzophrenia(that by the way is one of the OLDEST Mental/MIND tricks--to accuse someone Insanity then when they deny it thats proof they are!!)
Your really scraping the bottom of the Barrel
|
|
|
|
Post by Peter on Nov 17, 2008 3:38:47 GMT -5
I have been thinking about the way this thread has been going, and reflecting on my impression that my latest emails have been a tad lacking in compassion.
No I didn't do anything illegal Swami, I just looked up the domain registration information you yourself made a matter of public record when you bought your website. I hope to be able to prove this to the court's satisfaction when the Police come for me.
There is no privacy on the Internet. A door, once opened, goes both ways. I did respect your privacy to the extent of not posting your street and house number - now that would have been rude!
|
|
|
|
Post by swamicollins on Nov 17, 2008 3:51:57 GMT -5
PETER you are a LYING SLIMEBALL-you have sent VIRUS to my Computer and have jammed it up--I WARN ALL OTHER USERS THAT SLIMEBALL PETER SENDS VIRUS TO ANYONE THROUGH HIS POSTINGS--This "apology for a man" has no respect for others privacy and should be banned from the NET worldwide-He is a Proven LIAR and FANTASISER--
He sends VIRUS through his posted babble
|
|
sophia
Full Member
...the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light. ~Plato
Posts: 146
|
Post by sophia on Nov 17, 2008 9:29:52 GMT -5
Swami,
Please forgive me for trying to label you as schizophrenic. You are right - I did scape the bottom of the barrel for that one.
You can't catch a virus from reading these forum messages. If you do have a virus, email me and I can help you get rid of it.
Your friend,
-Sophia
|
|
|
|
Post by swamicollins on Nov 17, 2008 10:46:23 GMT -5
sOPHIA -like your friends Peter and Light Mystic you are untrustworthy fantasiser
|
|
|
|
Post by lightmystic on Nov 17, 2008 10:49:51 GMT -5
Man, this Swami thing is turning out pretty sad. I have to say it's getting old. Anyway, Peter, I think it might actually be impossible to explain my experience of pure subjectivity, but it would have to assume objectivity for you be able to relate to it. That's pretty funny now that I think about it. Maybe I can put it this way. If everything is experienced as essentially the same as you, then everything that is perceived is also recognized as the perceiver. So if everything is the perceiver (i.e. subjective) looking at the perceiver (i.e. subjective), then what isn't subjective? The only thing that could perhaps not be seen as ultimately subjective might be the PROCESS Self of perceiving Self. However, It's my experience that the process is just as much the Self too. So that ends up with a situation that's pure subjectivity. There a realization that really helped me when unity was starting to come together was when I was wondering how two things, separated by space and time, could unify. What I found was that I was assuming a process of perception that was separate from me. Thus, if the actual process of seeing itself was me, then recognizing what was seen as me was not so different, and so not so hard to accept. Does that make sense? |
|
|
|
Post by swamicollins on Nov 17, 2008 13:08:40 GMT -5
LM-yes it makes sense! NONSENSE!
|
|
|
|
Post by lightmystic on Nov 17, 2008 14:29:02 GMT -5
Don't worry Swami. At some point you will understand what I'm talking about, even if it's not this lifetime. LM-yes it makes sense! NONSENSE! |
|
|
|
Post by Peter on Nov 18, 2008 7:44:44 GMT -5
Man, this Swami thing is turning out pretty sad. I have to say it's getting old. Don't know about old, but this thread has definitely left a bad taste in my mouth. I think the next time someone comes in announcing that they're all this and all that, and that the rest of the world needs to listen to the Great Word, I'll just nod and welcome them to the group. I knew giving 'constructive' criticism wasn't going to get us off on a friendly footing which I was prepared for, but I wasn't expecting the downward spiral that followed. I should try to remember that it's infringing someone's free will to hold a mirror up to them if they haven't asked for feedback. Work is most pressing today, so I'll have a think about your subjective/objective writing and hopefully come back with something considered (in a new thread!) sometime this evening. Take care, P |
|
|
|
Post by swamicollins on Nov 22, 2008 6:56:06 GMT -5
|
|
