|
Post by tzujanli on Jan 24, 2015 6:44:44 GMT -5
Who are you confronting, if there's only oneness?.. what is there to confront if nonduality is the case?.. you deny volition and separation, yet argue as if those are the case, as if the experiencers would choose a fundamentally different understanding based on 'your' differing belief confronting them.. The conceptual understanding of oneness and non-volition are not that difficult, and have been described to you repeatedly for years. Again, you're free to disagree, but your questions indicate that you don't understand. And yet you say that you studied nonduality. How is that possible? Using the escape clause, 'you don't understand', to dodge explaining/clarifying your contradictions is a favorite tactic of yours.. You say there is 'not two', yet you conduct your existence in a way that exemplifies many-ness.. the "conceptual understanding of oneness" as you present it is a mantra that says: you know the truth and disagreement with the truth you think you know is wrong.. when your contradictions are exposed you resort to your escape clauses: 'you don't understand', or 'i'm not talking to you anymore', or 'it's ineffable'.. My questions indicate that you present contradictions, and your evasion indicates you know that and don't want to reveal more of the same..
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Jan 24, 2015 7:17:58 GMT -5
That's interesting.. that you choose to speak for others, for me and my interest, and for Earnest's heart.. you didn't ask about 'frequency and tone', if you were interested how i would answer that question, you could have simply asked..Thanx (** muttley snicker **)
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Jan 24, 2015 12:31:17 GMT -5
That's interesting.. that you choose to speak for others, for me and my interest, and for Earnest's heart.. you didn't ask about 'frequency and tone', if you were interested how i would answer that question, you could have simply asked..Thanx It's always nice when folks take a genuine interest in what's talked about here, huh?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 24, 2015 12:35:33 GMT -5
Thanx It's always nice when folks take a genuine interest in what's talked about here, huh? Absolutely. Heartwarming an' all.
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Jan 24, 2015 12:38:32 GMT -5
The conceptual understanding of oneness and non-volition are not that difficult, and have been described to you repeatedly for years. Again, you're free to disagree, but your questions indicate that you don't understand. And yet you say that you studied nonduality. How is that possible? Using the escape clause, 'you don't understand', to dodge explaining/clarifying your contradictions is a favorite tactic of yours.. You say there is 'not two', yet you conduct your existence in a way that exemplifies many-ness.. the "conceptual understanding of oneness" as you present it is a mantra that says: you know the truth and disagreement with the truth you think you know is wrong.. when your contradictions are exposed you resort to your escape clauses: 'you don't understand', or 'i'm not talking to you anymore', or 'it's ineffable'.. My questions indicate that you present contradictions, and your evasion indicates you know that and don't want to reveal more of the same.. I've made so many attempts over the years to try to help you understand the concepts, and have failed miserably. It seems pointless to keep trying, and a conceptual understanding would seem to be a prerequisite to any potential realization of what is being pointed to. At the very least, it would put an end to the misconceived questions and imagining of contradictions.
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Jan 24, 2015 13:12:29 GMT -5
It's always nice when folks take a genuine interest in what's talked about here, huh? Absolutely. Heartwarming an' all. It leads naturally to open discussion that's more honest.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 24, 2015 13:22:40 GMT -5
Absolutely. Heartwarming an' all. It leads naturally to open discussion that's more honest. Without fail?
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Jan 24, 2015 15:14:24 GMT -5
It leads naturally to open discussion that's more honest. Without fail? How can one fail at being themselves?
|
|