|
Post by silver on Dec 27, 2014 23:26:08 GMT -5
Not only not nice, it's manipulative and toadally lacks integrity. Doesn't integrity smack of morals? I thought youze guys were against them?
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Dec 27, 2014 23:38:40 GMT -5
Not only not nice, it's manipulative and toadally lacks integrity. Doesn't integrity smack of morals? I thought youze guys were against them? Against morals?
|
|
|
Post by tzujanli on Dec 27, 2014 23:53:34 GMT -5
Not only not nice, it's manipulative and toadally lacks integrity. Manipulative? lacks integrity? when the original post shows the actual quote immediately previous? No E, it was humor at the expense of the obvious..
|
|
|
Post by silver on Dec 27, 2014 23:56:14 GMT -5
Doesn't integrity smack of morals? I thought youze guys were against them? Against morals? Maybe I was thinking of Laffy.
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Dec 28, 2014 5:48:10 GMT -5
Not only not nice, it's manipulative and toadally lacks integrity. Manipulative? lacks integrity? when the original post shows the actual quote immediately previous? No E, it was humor at the expense of the obvious.. Likely story.
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Dec 28, 2014 12:36:39 GMT -5
Not only not nice, it's manipulative and toadally lacks integrity. Manipulative? lacks integrity? when the original post shows the actual quote immediately previous? No E, it was humor at the expense of the obvious.. I wonder how many readers didn't catch your so called humor.
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Dec 28, 2014 12:41:50 GMT -5
Against morals? Maybe I was thinking of Laffy. I doubt that. There have been discussions here about the nature of morality and it's role in spirituality, (most memorably with Arisha) and you likely misinterpreted.
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Dec 28, 2014 15:59:11 GMT -5
Maybe I was thinking of Laffy. I doubt that. There have been discussions here about the nature of morality and it's role in spirituality, (most memorably with Arisha) and you likely misinterpreted. The point that it's not possible to live a concept is very easily misinterpreted even by peeps that are deep into nonduality and have no beef with it.
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Dec 29, 2014 1:22:08 GMT -5
I doubt that. There have been discussions here about the nature of morality and it's role in spirituality, (most memorably with Arisha) and you likely misinterpreted. The point that it's not possible to live a concept is very easily misinterpreted even by peeps that are deep into nonduality and have no beef with it. Almost nobody in these here parts gets absence of malice.
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Dec 29, 2014 13:07:07 GMT -5
The point that it's not possible to live a concept is very easily misinterpreted even by peeps that are deep into nonduality and have no beef with it. Almost nobody in these here parts gets absence of malice. yeah, even when ya' know it there's that persistent illusion thingy goin' on sometimes ....
|
|
|
Post by freejoy on Jan 21, 2015 23:33:10 GMT -5
'Ego' is an illusion, nonexistent until granted that right by the invocation of its imagined meaning.. choosing to believe in ego, keeps it alive for the duration of the belief.. The 'tape-loops' you describe are the socio-religious conditionings that are mistaken for the definitions of what we 'are', but they are the limitations that distort what we are.. Yes, ego is a set of self referential ideas based on the belief that one is a separate, volitional person, and this is illusion. Without volition it seems one would then have a "purpose"?
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Jan 21, 2015 23:56:04 GMT -5
Yes, ego is a set of self referential ideas based on the belief that one is a separate, volitional person, and this is illusion. Without volition it seems one would then have a "purpose"? Not sure how you conclude that unless you assume predetermination in place of volition. Nobody has predetermined anything.
|
|
|
Post by freejoy on Jan 22, 2015 0:28:55 GMT -5
Without volition it seems one would then have a "purpose"? Not sure how you conclude that unless you assume predetermination in place of volition. Nobody has predetermined anything. Seems that way. Looks like it would be one or the other. That doesn't really concern me much. In general isn't the Tantrix way to get everything this non existent ego wants before enlightenment can happen...generally speaking? Also what about this non existent ego being stimulated in negative ways. There seems to be more things this ego hasn't overcome that has shown up. :)
|
|
|
Post by freejoy on Jan 22, 2015 0:46:30 GMT -5
As far as purpose goes enlightenmemt might not be my destiny.
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Jan 22, 2015 1:53:41 GMT -5
Not sure how you conclude that unless you assume predetermination in place of volition. Nobody has predetermined anything. Seems that way. Looks like it would be one or the other. That doesn't really concern me much. In general isn't the Tantrix way to get everything this non existent ego wants before enlightenment can happen...generally speaking? Also what about this non existent ego being stimulated in negative ways. There seems to be more things this ego hasn't overcome that has shown up. I dunno what Tantrix is.
|
|