|
|
Post by laughter on Apr 14, 2016 12:02:27 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2016 15:46:25 GMT -5
why is there a *snicker* thread and a COMMENTS thread?  |
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Apr 14, 2016 22:32:27 GMT -5
seems you just lost with your snickering response to figgles. This is a potentially interesting topic of dialog and I disagree with your opinion, but if you'd like me to engage in detail, kindly respond to this question first.  |
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Apr 14, 2016 22:33:59 GMT -5
why is there a *snicker* thread and a COMMENTS thread? Easier for me to keep track of the snicker count that way. |
|
|
|
Post by jay17 on Apr 15, 2016 2:39:37 GMT -5
seems you just lost with your snickering response to figgles. This is a potentially interesting topic of dialog and I disagree with your opinion, but if you'd like me to engage in detail, kindly respond to this question first. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 15, 2016 8:59:52 GMT -5
why is there a *snicker* thread and a COMMENTS thread? Easier for me to keep track of the snicker count that way. I know, I know.. I was just having some fun with reading comprehension  |
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Apr 30, 2016 19:39:11 GMT -5
This is a potentially interesting topic of dialog and I disagree with your opinion, but if you'd like me to engage in detail, kindly respond to this question first. The text you link to offers no direct answer to this question: do you really believe that you are performing the function of alien incubation with your body, or is some part or all of that notion something you're writing in jest? |
|
|
|
Post by jay17 on Apr 30, 2016 20:24:02 GMT -5
oh, ok, my bad, try this, and if you have any need or desire to discuss it further, read this |
|
|
|
Post by earnest on May 1, 2016 0:50:20 GMT -5
The text you link to offers no direct answer to this question: do you really believe that you are performing the function of alien incubation with your body, or is some part or all of that notion something you're writing in jest? pics and it *did* happen....  |
|
|
|
Post by laughter on May 26, 2016 20:24:16 GMT -5
You already lost the challenge dude. Muttley snicker #1 ring a bell? A direct response is a direct response. Nice try though.  Well, dear figgle, if that were true why would you have bothered to tip-toe through the tulips over these past few weeks like so, for example? spiritualteachers.proboards.com/post/332455/threadspiritualteachers.proboards.com/post/333767/threadspiritualteachers.proboards.com/post/334208/threadspiritualteachers.proboards.com/post/335218/threadspiritualteachers.proboards.com/post/335675/threadspiritualteachers.proboards.com/post/338070/threadspiritualteachers.proboards.com/post/338624/threadspiritualteachers.proboards.com/post/339802/threadIf you would have responded to the first and 2nd snicker's at the time I would have explained to you then, as I am now, that they were an invitation to consider the spirit of the contract rather than the letter. In that first instance, clearly, "the one in question" leaves precisely zero doubt as to the referent: Ok, because the thread is clearly intended to make laffy look bad has made it abundantly clear through his own way of engagement, that he does not shrink away from direct challenge. ... to the letter of the bet you didn't mention my name, this much is true, but even the most intricate and cleverly devised law has loopholes, and quite obviously you let your obsession get the better of you in that instance. Now, as it is, I'll remind you that neither of us has gone outside the letter of the bet in this sub-thread starting from here: No prohibition against a dialog once it starts. As far as the spirit of it is concerned, I can play these other sorts of games if you'd like. Indefinitely.  Or are you so obsessed with me that you just can't bear to play any longer?  |
|
|
|
Post by laughter on May 26, 2016 22:10:36 GMT -5
Clearly, YOU blew it. What's that I smell??   |
|
|
|
Post by figgles on May 27, 2016 11:26:51 GMT -5
Clearly, YOU blew it. What's that I smell?? What's that I smell?   |
|
|
|
Post by laughter on May 28, 2016 6:28:43 GMT -5
What's that I smell?? What's that I smell? The only movement of mind that ever calls out and mocks the ego of the other is ego. |
|
|
|
Post by figgles on May 28, 2016 12:32:43 GMT -5
The only movement of mind that ever calls out and mocks the ego of the other is ego. So that means when you engage here you are almost constantly engaging from ego. |
|
|
|
Post by laughter on May 29, 2016 5:49:18 GMT -5
The only movement of mind that ever calls out and mocks the ego of the other is ego. So that means when you engage here you are almost constantly engaging from ego. I understand that it seems this way to you. And why. |
|
Or are you so obsessed with me that you just can't bear to play any longer? 