Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2013 1:08:37 GMT -5
Oooooh....that sound fun!!  More mocking from the one that complains about other mockers. That describes you perfectly. YOu refer to me as having a 'fairytale, unicorn spirituality, pre-kindergarten party and you expect a serious response? ;D |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2013 1:11:17 GMT -5
Why won't you answer my question Reefs? What was negative about any of that? I've already answered. But you are unable to grasp it. Now you want to turn it into something against me. I said this: And you said this: Read more: spiritualteachers.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=misc&thread=2681&page=9#ixzz2NCzGIXk1Now,what was negative about any part of that? You call others out all time for not directly answering your questions Reefs....if you genuinely see something there that can be termed 'negative backlash,' please indicate it to me. |
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on Mar 11, 2013 1:12:55 GMT -5
More mocking from the one that complains about other mockers. That describes you perfectly. YOu refer to me as having a 'fairytale, unicorn spirituality, pre-kindergarten party and you expect a serious response? ;D I've never seen a a serious response from you. So, no. |
|
|
|
Post by silver on Mar 11, 2013 1:14:38 GMT -5
Oooooh....that sound fun!! More mocking from the one that complains about other mockers. That describes you perfectly. Well, if anyone is learning how to do this, it would be from you. You've done it constantly - the highlight is the poo flinging that you were using to mock heterodox a while back - the one Peter was especially unfond of. So, this is just another kettle / black scenario. That's the wonderful thing about memory - you've given me plenty of memories of that sort of thing...'member? |
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on Mar 11, 2013 1:14:55 GMT -5
You are blind to your own negativity. Your unicorn sweet candy philosophy doesn't allow you to look at it. That's the trap. There's no way out. It's hopeless. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2013 1:16:35 GMT -5
YOu refer to me as having a 'fairytale, unicorn spirituality, pre-kindergarten party and you expect a serious response? ;D I've never seen a a serious response from you. So, no. Well, the one right above this IS. I'm quite serious about you clarifying where this 'negative backlash' is. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2013 1:18:09 GMT -5
You are blind to your own negativity. Your unicorn sweet candy philosophy doesn't allow you to look at it. That's the trap. There's no way out. It's hopeless. Okay, I get it. You believe you see negative backlash there that you are insisting I am blind to. Could you please share what it is? |
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on Mar 11, 2013 1:18:48 GMT -5
More mocking from the one that complains about other mockers. That describes you perfectly. Well, if anyone is learning how to do this, it would be from you. You've done it constantly - the highlight is the poo flinging that you were using to mock heterodox a while back - the one Peter was especially unfond of. So, this is just another kettle / black scenario. That's the wonderful thing about memory - you've given me plenty of memories of that sort of thing...'member? You can't help Figgy. She's lost in her denial. Actually she is rather harmless because no one except Andrew is believing in her sweet candy unicorn rainbow stuff here anyway. It's basically just self talk and pep talk for Andrew to cheer him up. What Andrew is doing is much more dangerous, it's severe spiritual malpractice. |
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on Mar 11, 2013 1:20:14 GMT -5
I've never seen a a serious response from you. So, no. Well, the one right above this IS. I'm quite serious about you clarifying where this 'negative backlash' is. You want me to call B and tell him to do his thing again? How can you be so blind? |
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on Mar 11, 2013 1:22:44 GMT -5
You are blind to your own negativity. Your unicorn sweet candy philosophy doesn't allow you to look at it. That's the trap. There's no way out. It's hopeless. Okay, I get it. You believe you see negative backlash there that you are insisting I am blind to. Could you please share what it is? Your ideology doesn't allow you to look at it. Your dogma teaches you to ignore it and then call that 'embracing it' which basically is just denial. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2013 1:24:09 GMT -5
Well, the one right above this IS. I'm quite serious about you clarifying where this 'negative backlash' is. You want me to call B and tell him to do his thing again? How can you be so blind? Spell it out for me. |
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on Mar 11, 2013 1:25:47 GMT -5
You want me to call B and tell him to do his thing again? How can you be so blind? Spell it out for me. Take a nap and then come back and look at today's posts again and you will see - or not. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2013 1:37:10 GMT -5
Take a nap and then come back and look at today's posts again and you will see - or not. What? I will see how my words in that post indicated the existence of a 'backlash'? This is really silly Reefs. You never have a problem being direct. Why now? The fact is, my leaving the forum when I did was mostly to attend to a project that absolutely makes my heart soar...The very fact that I get to make a living from doing these things is a dream come true. A loss of interest in participating on a forum coupled with a need to meet certain deadlines for work I love, is about the furthest thing from a 'backlash' that I can imagine. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2013 1:44:16 GMT -5
More mocking from the one that complains about other mockers. That describes you perfectly. Well, if anyone is learning how to do this, it would be from you. You've done it constantly - the highlight is the poo flinging that you were using to mock heterodox a while back - the one Peter was especially unfond of. So, this is just another kettle / black scenario.
That's the wonderful thing about memory - you've given me plenty of memories of that sort of thing...'member?Yup....now that's what I'd call 'negative backlash.'  |
|
|
|
Post by andrew on Mar 11, 2013 3:15:47 GMT -5
Even so, the thought to report MUST have arisen with a sense that forum rules have been contravened, and that there should be some action taken as a response. Some sense of 'injustice' or 'inappropriateness'. Why else report? Its not the first time E has reported posts either. I do remember a sense that there needs to be some clarity as to what 'bickering' means, if that helps, but I'm not going to say that was the reason. It was just a thought. In your case, I speculate that the apparent lack of self judgment about it confounds you. If anything it would be the lack of self awareness that confounds me here. What you said here doesn't make sense in the context of you reporting the posts. I will say again that there MUST have been a sense that a forum rule was contravened unless you are just hitting 'report post' completely randomly. With that sense that a forum rule was contravened, there would have been an accompanying motivation to hit the 'report post' button. What was that motivation? |
|
