|
Post by topology on Jun 17, 2012 9:28:17 GMT -5
I didn't know enlightened people had "rank". Didn't know you were an expert on something that you aren't I didn't know that you thought I wasn't an expert
|
|
|
Post by desertmoonrise on Jun 17, 2012 18:30:56 GMT -5
RT did invasions? Woah, it's like the /b/tards of spirituality. (And if you understand that, then I'm sorry.)
I read the farewell letter posted on the RT site (Gun background? Really?) and I have to say something in me admires the willingness to lose so much in the quest for what is true. In some societies such action might be absolutely necessary to touch solid ground, and it's for that kind of willingness that we have some of the luminaries that we do today. But, it's ultimately just one ingredient in the enlightenment recipe, and to complicate matters further everyone's recipe is different.
So, kudos for having the guts, tsk tsk for glorifying them?
|
|
|
Post by topology on Jun 17, 2012 20:23:00 GMT -5
RT did invasions? Woah, it's like the /b/tards of spirituality. (And if you understand that, then I'm sorry.) I read the farewell letter posted on the RT site (Gun background? Really?) and I have to say something in me admires the willingness to lose so much in the quest for what is true. In some societies such action might be absolutely necessary to touch solid ground, and it's for that kind of willingness that we have some of the luminaries that we do today. But, it's ultimately just one ingredient in the enlightenment recipe, and to complicate matters further everyone's recipe is different. So, kudos for having the guts, tsk tsk for glorifying them? Was it a quest for truth? I take that to mean that the truth is unknown and being saught. As Stephven's behavior exhibits, he believes he has the truth already. What they did was not search for truth but try to spread what they believed the truth was, no different than any zealot sect hellbent on conversion of others by all means necessary, the flesh version of the Borg.
|
|
|
Post by topology on Jun 17, 2012 20:33:31 GMT -5
www.spiritualforums.com/vb/showthread.php?t=19026The originator of this thread was originally named Enlightened, but then later changed the name to Rikki. Apparently RT had manuals on how to do forum invasions. You would go in pairs, just like mormons and jahovah witnesses to prevent the deprogramming of the drones.
|
|
|
Post by desertmoonrise on Jun 17, 2012 21:12:09 GMT -5
They sent in the key to enlightenment with two drones?! Madness! They'd be overrun and the key'd be stolen for good!
|
|
|
Post by topology on Jun 17, 2012 21:21:14 GMT -5
They sent in the key to enlightenment with two drones?! Madness! They'd be overrun and the key'd be stolen for good! Yes well, we did end up rallying. Nothing like a good foreign invasion to bring the host together in an immune response.
|
|
|
Post by hicquodiam on Jun 23, 2012 12:59:09 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by hicquodiam on Jun 23, 2012 12:59:27 GMT -5
the archive at least
|
|
|
Post by stepvhen on Jun 23, 2012 13:23:08 GMT -5
RT did invasions? Woah, it's like the /b/tards of spirituality. (And if you understand that, then I'm sorry.) I read the farewell letter posted on the RT site (Gun background? Really?) and I have to say something in me admires the willingness to lose so much in the quest for what is true. In some societies such action might be absolutely necessary to touch solid ground, and it's for that kind of willingness that we have some of the luminaries that we do today. But, it's ultimately just one ingredient in the enlightenment recipe, and to complicate matters further everyone's recipe is different. So, kudos for having the guts, tsk tsk for glorifying them? Tha'ts the most balanced post I've heard on here. Jenkins is right by the way. www.truthtrike.com presents the Ruthless Truth changeover to Truth Strike www.ruthlesstruth.com/arena/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=1508Back for 12 hours Ruthless Truth is done we're changing over to Truth Strike. The Vanguard is back in place, and Truth Strike will be a more open approachable Ruthless Truth. More balance, more science. More liberation.
|
|
|
Post by question on Jun 23, 2012 16:44:12 GMT -5
Why only 12 hours? More balance, more science. More liberation.
|
|
|
Post by topology on Jun 23, 2012 17:13:19 GMT -5
Why only 12 hours? More balance, more science. More liberation. The founder quit because he felt like no one was sacrificing anywhere near as much as he was... Now the founder is charging for private sessions and these guys (truth strike) had to fork over some dough to make the archive available. Don't know what 12 hours is going to do except allow people to make a copy of the data.
|
|
|
Post by harryd on Jun 26, 2012 7:03:59 GMT -5
He had an ego. He transcended self not ego. Big difference. You cannot not have an ego. Many teachers have positive ones, he didn't. Oh yeah? Who made this dingbat an authority? Or right, his Liberators did - namely, the guys whose d-icks he sucked to get his stars and stripes so he could get people down on their knees and call them "liberated" too! What a joke. SICK! Did all that liberator-jism go to your head SteV-O? LOL. For anyone who's paying attention and has two crying out loud brain cells to rub together: a) how does "StepVen" KNOW if this Sauran dude had an ego or not? b) How does he KNOW if he transcended "self"? c) How does he KNOW that "you cannot not have an ego"? d) How does he KNOW the difference between self and ego -without referring to his dipshit super-duper-Illuminati manual to make sure he is keeping to the Script? e) What the f-u-c-k is a "positive ego" anyway? f) How does he KNOW ANY of this? Answer to a-f: he doesn't!! But whoop-di-doo-dah, he knows how to SOUND like he does! Cheese-arse, people - read the f-u-cking fine print!!: your cure-all remedy is military-industrialized poison, oh well. Back to the whoring horde. If this is the sort of presumptive preemptive BS that Toothless Ruth and Her (big-di-ck)-strokers are jamming down people's throats, then no f-u-ckin wonder it's a BIG FAT CUMSHOT HIT with spotty teenagers, reformed skinheads and sadsack try-anything spiritual seekers. There's plenty of people out there who want to be beaten to their knees, made to SWALLOW someone else's godspell, and then raised up in sweaty cum-spattered glory for it. Hey, it was good enough for JC right? WRONG!!!! You just got the royal boot, sucker. Welcome to your 19th bardo breakdown realm. Or better yet, check the FACTS and keep moving.
|
|
|
Post by question on Jun 26, 2012 8:03:20 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by stepvhen on Jul 9, 2012 18:02:24 GMT -5
You remind me of me a year ago. Also, I know you don't I. Have a puppy
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 10, 2012 7:39:39 GMT -5
You remind me of me a year ago. Also, I know you don't I. For kicks, about a year ago: That is correct. When I say, "I am what is," I am not referring to a person; I am referring to the totality of all being. THAT is who and what we are, spoken of from a perspective of emptiness beyond all ideational boundaries. In that case when you say "I am what is". You're lying because you're not actually what is. You're just saying that you are for some reason. Really there is only what is. If there is only what is, what's the problem saying I am what is?
|
|