|
Post by zin on Oct 25, 2015 17:10:55 GMT -5
My mind is very scattered now but will write anyway! Nice that you stopped to take a falling leaf pic. In the first pic (here) I wish there was also a version in which I could see the tree more (less rocks, more of the tree) but for that you must rise in the air a bit I guess . I remembered: While taking the last pic I put on the pic thread the seagull always turned her back on me, I was even ready to creep on the ground but I understood that it would be useless and I would not be able to take a front view pic.. Thanks for putting these. Here's a little hint for ya. It went through half a box of Cheesit crackers to get this pic I got lucky in this snap as the gulls were completely separate with no overlap of one over the other, allowing for a cool capture. So you suggest bribery! .. but the result is nice.. : )
|
|
|
Post by justlikeyou on Oct 25, 2015 17:14:14 GMT -5
Here's a little hint for ya. It went through half a box of Cheesit crackers to get this pic I got lucky in this snap as the gulls were completely separate with no overlap of one over the other, allowing for a cool capture. So you suggest bribery! .. but the result is nice.. : ) All is fair in love and photography they say...or somthin like that
|
|
|
Post by zin on Oct 25, 2015 17:24:41 GMT -5
So you suggest bribery! .. but the result is nice.. : ) All is fair in love and photography they say...or somthin like that In addition to bribery there is distortion of folk sayings!.. but haiku world is a bit different, right? - I will read a bit more on them.
|
|
|
Post by justlikeyou on Oct 25, 2015 17:26:22 GMT -5
All is fair in love and photography they say...or somthin like that In addition to bribery there is distortion of folk sayings!.. but haiku world is a bit different, right? - I will read a bit more on them. For you.
|
|
|
Post by zin on Oct 25, 2015 17:28:08 GMT -5
1- this a copy-paste event, I'm not hopeful about avatar pics 2- liked the leaf in the air! 3- I could end with "towards ten thousand" -- because the word 'lone' made me a bit sad : ) It's a very strong work .. although, in the end, it invokes an air of specialness. Nevertheless, quite profound. Are you speaking for the haiku, for the pic, or for haiku plus pic? Or my copy-paste event? (lol!) I can speak a little more after your answer.
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Oct 26, 2015 16:47:47 GMT -5
No doubt! Ego can't be witnessed in someone else with objective clarity -- in seeing it I create it, there's no escaping that. The relevant question, really, is whether it was noticed at the time of the creation .. or knot. Good haiku always leaves blanks to be filled in by the readers imagination. That's the fun of it The relevant question, really, is whether it was noticed at the time of the creation .. or knot. So did your judgy friends think that one was good? Hey, I thought it was awesome, and I do mean that sincerely, even to the point of admitting jealousy.
|
|
|
Post by justlikeyou on Oct 26, 2015 18:34:21 GMT -5
Good haiku always leaves blanks to be filled in by the readers imagination. That's the fun of it The relevant question, really, is whether it was noticed at the time of the creation .. or knot. So did your judgy friends think that one was good? Hey, I thought it was awesome, and I do mean that sincerely, even to the point of admitting jealousy. You were my motivation. I had hoped it would be an illustration of what I was trying to tell you in the earlier post about the two parts to a haiku. My weak explanations weren't cutting it with you, so the thought occurred that I should try to show you instead of telling you. There was no intent to show off, only the intent to show you what I am pretty certain is in you to do. That was the reason for the first post as well. I felt the need to try to explain it to you, but it didn't fly the first time. I really think you have what it takes to be an outstanding haiku writer. Yes, judgy friends enjoyed it very much but suggested that I didn't need the "in" in the first line :-) I am a quicker learner regarding the formulations of haiku but still a bit "in"-experienced as you can see.
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Oct 27, 2015 1:51:41 GMT -5
So did your judgy friends think that one was good? Hey, I thought it was awesome, and I do mean that sincerely, even to the point of admitting jealousy. You were my motivation. I had hoped it would be an illustration of what I was trying to tell you in the earlier post about the two parts to a haiku. My weak explanations weren't cutting it with you, so the thought occurred that I should try to show you instead of telling you. There was no intent to show off, only the intent to show you what I am pretty certain is in you to do. That was the reason for the first post as well. I felt the need to try to explain it to you, but it didn't fly the first time. I really think you have what it takes to be an outstanding haiku writer. Yes, judgy friends enjoyed it very much but suggested that I didn't need the "in" in the first line :-) I am a quicker learner regarding the formulations of haiku but still a bit "in"-experienced as you can see. Well, it's funny the way what comes and goes tends to spin itself out. The story of this particular great haiku is quite the winding road, ey? Technical expertise can be cultivated and what comes of that can be beautiful, but the cultivation is often based on deconstruction. The resulting reconstruction is always based, in turn, on some set of cultural conditioning. In a sense, in judging art, we judge what isn't subject to judgement, or, said another way, we render the unconditioned in conditional terms.
|
|
|
Post by justlikeyou on Oct 27, 2015 7:10:55 GMT -5
You were my motivation. I had hoped it would be an illustration of what I was trying to tell you in the earlier post about the two parts to a haiku. My weak explanations weren't cutting it with you, so the thought occurred that I should try to show you instead of telling you. There was no intent to show off, only the intent to show you what I am pretty certain is in you to do. That was the reason for the first post as well. I felt the need to try to explain it to you, but it didn't fly the first time. I really think you have what it takes to be an outstanding haiku writer. Yes, judgy friends enjoyed it very much but suggested that I didn't need the "in" in the first line :-) I am a quicker learner regarding the formulations of haiku but still a bit "in"-experienced as you can see. Well, it's funny the way what comes and goes tends to spin itself out. The story of this particular great haiku is quite the winding road, ey? Technical expertise can be cultivated and what comes of that can be beautiful, but the cultivation is often based on deconstruction. The resulting reconstruction is always based, in turn, on some set of cultural conditioning. In a sense, in judging art, we judge what isn't subject to judgement, or, said another way, we render the unconditioned in conditional terms. Yes to all of that.
|
|
|
Post by justlikeyou on May 21, 2016 20:01:56 GMT -5
One of the principle ideas in haiku is to write/say what you see, not what you think, feel or imagine.
|
|
|
Post by zin on May 22, 2016 5:06:28 GMT -5
One of the principle ideas in haiku is to write/say what you see, not what you think, feel or imagine. Whaaat?? It's too late!
|
|
|
Post by justlikeyou on May 23, 2016 13:32:32 GMT -5
One of the principle ideas in haiku is to write/say what you see, not what you think, feel or imagine. Whaaat?? It's too late! It's never too late :-)
|
|
|
Post by zin on May 23, 2016 20:43:07 GMT -5
Whaaat?? It's too late! It's never too late :-) All right but it is very difficult for me! I managed to keep to it for only two lines: sitting at the pond mosquito army attacks thunderbolt hits them
|
|
|
Post by glimmer on May 25, 2016 3:12:21 GMT -5
gulls & twilight - photo haiku
|
|
|
Post by zin on May 25, 2016 3:16:08 GMT -5
gulls & twilight - photo haiku nice!
|
|