|
Post by enigma on Nov 25, 2013 19:42:20 GMT -5
If you don't want war, then you have to turn your focus away from war and ignore everything war-like. That's LOA 101. But that requires a certain power of focus which you obviously don't have or else you wouldn't just wherever the discussion goes. Basically the topic you want to explore here is forum meltdowns. I find that pretty odd. Isn't the highlighting of someone's word choice representative of that same kind of focus? *blood-curdling battle cry* And leaf's battle percentage is about 2.45% vs. your 4.92% on "war"/all words word usage. Obviously your war focus is greater. If there's war every time she engages the forum, isn't her battle percentage 100%?
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Nov 25, 2013 19:44:25 GMT -5
I don't have an image about you from elsewhere, but there's one forming about your interactions here. I've pretty much got you pegged as a whining troublemaker. Does that pretty much agree with your own self image? It does seem like you must have some sort of image about her because you thought you knew her previously. There must be something there. No, there really isn't. It only looks that way if you're studying Figs' latest painting.
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Nov 25, 2013 19:52:02 GMT -5
I don't have an image about you from elsewhere, but there's one forming about your interactions here. I've pretty much got you pegged as a whining troublemaker. Does that pretty much agree with your own self image? Hmmm.....I'd put money on the fact that the person you thought Autumnleaf was from your past, just happens to also be a 'whining troublemaker, in your opinion, too. You'd lose this week's grocery money.
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Nov 25, 2013 20:01:56 GMT -5
I don't remember insisting and I don't remember her asserting otherwise (until now). Ah...well, I do recall her correcting you and you continuing to say no, that's where the 'insisting' came from. Actually, I'm pretty sure you specified the Pavlina forum....It piqued my interest when I saw that, 'cause as you may recall....I was there too. I was trying to place Autumnleaf there, but came up empty. Can't imagine who you thought she was...... And perhaps I have it wrong, but seems to me that you stated is 'was' the pavlina forum. You seemed pretty sure, and again, that's what got me trying to place Autumn on the Pavlina Forum. The fact that you thought you knew her, but are wrong about that, indicates that your perceptions about her are at the very least a 'little murky.' I mean come on E...you were pretty sure you and she had met before and you were wrong.....right there, she was not who you 'thought' she was.I think she's interested in trying to understand where others here are coming from and she's not afraid to be direct....I'm impressed with the fact that so far, she can do that without getting personal or ugly. I don't know that I'm wrong and you don't either. As far as who I thought she was, I thought she was a poster named Autumn leaf that I knew on another forum. There's not much more to it than that. (10 minute warning: I've almost reached my insanity threshold in this discussion.)
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on Nov 25, 2013 20:24:40 GMT -5
If you don't want war, then you have to turn your focus away from war and ignore everything war-like. That's LOA 101. But that requires a certain power of focus which you obviously don't have or else you wouldn't just wherever the discussion goes. Basically the topic you want to explore here is forum meltdowns. I find that pretty odd. Isn't the highlighting of someone's word choice representative of that same kind of focus? *blood-curdling battle cry* And leaf's battle percentage is about 2.45% vs. your 4.92% on "war"/all words word usage. Obviously your war focus is greater. Are you serious? Please tell me that you are just kidding!
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on Nov 25, 2013 20:26:42 GMT -5
You are welcome to form your personal opinion. But I hope you won't justify abuse due to that opinion. I am being polite and friendly. I am not a troll, and it is impossible to have zero self awareness.When I read your posts and the posts of your cheerleaders and look at what posts they 'liked' then I'm not so sure about that.
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on Nov 25, 2013 20:29:33 GMT -5
You are on a non-duality forum here. I don't see the connection to non-duality in your endeavor. Clarity or lack thereof has no connection to non-duality? Her sole purpose for coming here is exploring meltdowns. Hello!?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 25, 2013 20:39:49 GMT -5
Clarity or lack thereof has no connection to non-duality? Her sole purpose for coming here is exploring meltdowns. Hello!? Ah!...so you don't just have her 'purpose' pegged, but her 'sole' purpose...? Nice painting Reefs. Seems to me she's interested in exploring the mindset(s) of those who see insanity and experience overwhelm when they become embroiled in what they regard to be a 'meltdown.' There is a quite a difference. In short, I'd say she's been looking on and seeing some here whose walk does not match their talk.
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on Nov 25, 2013 20:47:54 GMT -5
It sure as heck could be if you are wrong. What it means is that you believe something about Autumn that is not so...you have her 'pegged' in a sense regarding her position and outlook on these subjects...it would explain that you did not come empty to your conversation with her but rather allowed your memories of some other person to cloud your present moment experience with Autumnleaf. I find it interesting the confidence with which you made that assertion, even in the face of Autumnleaf not recognizing you. I'd say, Your confidence that you have others here 'pegged' gets in the way of coming empty to each conversation you have with them. I don't remember stating it with confidence. What did that look like? Was it the tone of my voice or the way I held my head high? I thought I remembered the screen name, and some vague recollections about the person associated with that name doing some word lawyering, but that's about it. Nothing that I could, or would, bring into this forum. I also don't see where I failed to 'come empty'. You're painting up a storm right now, Figs, and you've got nothing at all to go on. This is a witch hunt, pure and simple. Do you think if I threw myself on the mercy of the court that I could get a suspended sentence?
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on Nov 25, 2013 20:50:53 GMT -5
Okay. Two odd observations about this thread: 1) You don't want food fights happening in your thread and yet you did start your thread in the unmoderated section? I don't know what you were thinking when you did that but forum history shows that you can't protect your thread against food fighters without heavy moderation. So your thread seems a little misplaced. 2) You don't want food fights happening in your thread and yet the topic of this thread is premium food fight material. Apparently, she wants to start a fight but she also wants to deny any interest in or responsibility for it. I expect her to stomp off in righteous indignation a few times before we're done here. Well, she could explore her own meltdown. Or did she delete her posts?
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on Nov 25, 2013 20:51:19 GMT -5
If there's war every time she engages the forum, isn't her battle percentage 100%? No-brainer.
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on Nov 25, 2013 20:51:49 GMT -5
It does seem like you must have some sort of image about her because you thought you knew her previously. There must be something there. No, there really isn't. It only looks that way if you're studying Figs' latest painting.
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on Nov 25, 2013 20:52:47 GMT -5
Her sole purpose for coming here is exploring meltdowns. Hello!? Ah!...so you don't just have her 'purpose' pegged, but her 'sole' purpose...? Nice painting Reefs. Seems to me she's interested in exploring the mindset(s) of those who see insanity and experience overwhelm when they become embroiled in what they regard to be a 'meltdown.' There is a quite a difference. In short, I'd say she's been looking on and seeing some here whose walk does not match their talk.
|
|
|
Post by lolly on Nov 25, 2013 20:54:14 GMT -5
Harken the herald angels sing. hehehe
|
|
|
Post by silver on Nov 25, 2013 20:57:25 GMT -5
Clarity or lack thereof has no connection to non-duality? Her sole purpose for coming here is exploring meltdowns. Hello!? It makes sense to go where the meltdowns are plentiful in order to study them. Who's always at the scene of the crime?
|
|