|
Time
Aug 1, 2013 9:16:07 GMT -5
Post by ???????? ???????????? on Aug 1, 2013 9:16:07 GMT -5
My question is, why is she so fascinated by something that is only 11.8 inches big? Given she's in her 70s, if not 80s, likely with osteoporosis, 11.8 inches is already at risk of breaking a hip. Give the old bird a break.
|
|
|
Time
Aug 1, 2013 9:16:21 GMT -5
Post by laughter on Aug 1, 2013 9:16:21 GMT -5
... the answer lies in the investigation of the cultural context ... I don't think it's a cultural thing. They did tests of pictures flashing to women and they all got a bigger... well, let's just say "reaction" from the pictures showing a bigger... well, you know... *nudge nudge wink wink*. yeah, I can just hear Grace now ... "I need that rubber-minute!" ur baaaaaaaaad man
|
|
|
Time
Aug 1, 2013 9:17:16 GMT -5
Post by laughter on Aug 1, 2013 9:17:16 GMT -5
Given she's in her 70s, if not 80s, likely with osteoporosis, 11.8 inches is already at risk of breaking a hip. Give the old bird a break. ok.... I'm not watching that ...
|
|
|
Time
Aug 1, 2013 9:23:13 GMT -5
Post by topology on Aug 1, 2013 9:23:13 GMT -5
Given she's in her 70s, if not 80s, likely with osteoporosis, 11.8 inches is already at risk of breaking a hip. Give the old bird a break.
|
|
|
Time
Aug 1, 2013 9:26:42 GMT -5
Post by topology on Aug 1, 2013 9:26:42 GMT -5
ok.... I'm not watching that ... The reporter caves and finally gives her what she wants for her 100th birthday... *shudders*
|
|
|
Time
Aug 1, 2013 9:28:23 GMT -5
Post by laughter on Aug 1, 2013 9:28:23 GMT -5
ok.... I'm not watching that ... The reporter caves and finally gives her what she wants for her 100th birthday... *shudders* another "hundred years"?
|
|
|
Time
Aug 1, 2013 10:27:00 GMT -5
Post by serpentqueen on Aug 1, 2013 10:27:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
Time
Aug 1, 2013 10:31:06 GMT -5
Post by serpentqueen on Aug 1, 2013 10:31:06 GMT -5
So does anyone still remember next week's lottery numbers? I have bad memory, I forgot them. Would someone please tell me? Perhaps one of you oh so enlightened ones for whom time doesn't exist? The article is crap. Most of it is just mindless drivel to kill space, the few passages of substance are dead wrong, i.e. his commentary on quantum physics. "Anyone who is not shocked by quantum theory has not understood it." -- Niels Bohr
|
|
|
Time
Aug 1, 2013 10:38:32 GMT -5
Post by silver on Aug 1, 2013 10:38:32 GMT -5
Granny's got a 1-track mind, there. Hey. She didn't live to be 100 just to be cooperative!
|
|
|
Time
Aug 1, 2013 10:43:20 GMT -5
Post by topology on Aug 1, 2013 10:43:20 GMT -5
So does anyone still remember next week's lottery numbers? I have bad memory, I forgot them. Would someone please tell me? Perhaps one of you oh so enlightened ones for whom time doesn't exist? The article is crap. Most of it is just mindless drivel to kill space, the few passages of substance are dead wrong, i.e. his commentary on quantum physics. "Anyone who is not shocked by quantum theory has not understood it." -- Niels Bohr What happens at a quantum level does not extrapolate to a macro level. Once observed, an observation can't be undone. Steve's turning to this article is for the pop-science, which Q is right to call it a gross misunderstanding of physics.
|
|
|
Time
Aug 1, 2013 10:48:56 GMT -5
Post by laughter on Aug 1, 2013 10:48:56 GMT -5
So does anyone still remember next week's lottery numbers? I have bad memory, I forgot them. Would someone please tell me? Perhaps one of you oh so enlightened ones for whom time doesn't exist? The article is crap. Most of it is just mindless drivel to kill space, the few passages of substance are dead wrong, i.e. his commentary on quantum physics. "Anyone who is not shocked by quantum theory has not understood it." -- Niels Bohr 'ole MovieQ don't like Physics!
|
|
|
Time
Aug 1, 2013 10:51:10 GMT -5
Post by laughter on Aug 1, 2013 10:51:10 GMT -5
"Anyone who is not shocked by quantum theory has not understood it." -- Niels Bohr What happens at a quantum level does not extrapolate to a macro level. Once observed, an observation can't be undone. Steve's turning to this article is for the pop-science, which Q is right to call it a gross misunderstanding of physics. Tell that to Schroedinger's Cat!
|
|
|
Time
Aug 1, 2013 10:56:25 GMT -5
Post by topology on Aug 1, 2013 10:56:25 GMT -5
What happens at a quantum level does not extrapolate to a macro level. Once observed, an observation can't be undone. Steve's turning to this article is for the pop-science, which Q is right to call it a gross misunderstanding of physics. Tell that to Schroedinger's Cat! Meow, Meow, meow, Meow, MEOW!. Sorry Schroe, once you're observed to be dead, that's it big guy.
|
|
|
Time
Aug 1, 2013 11:26:47 GMT -5
Post by serpentqueen on Aug 1, 2013 11:26:47 GMT -5
Tell that to Schroedinger's Cat! Meow, Meow, meow, Meow, MEOW!. Sorry Schroe, once you're observed to be dead, that's it big guy. But somewhere in a parallel universe, the cat is alive....
|
|
|
Time
Aug 1, 2013 11:30:11 GMT -5
Post by topology on Aug 1, 2013 11:30:11 GMT -5
Meow, Meow, meow, Meow, MEOW!. Sorry Schroe, once you're observed to be dead, that's it big guy. But somewhere in a parallel universe, the cat is alive.... It is? Or are we just talking about the idea of a parallel universe to make ourselves feel good or feel like we are steeped in mystery? I've never visited a parallel universe, have you?
|
|