|
Post by silver on Jul 9, 2013 15:00:56 GMT -5
That is not what you are on about in your post to Peter.
Though what you are now writing about, is the majority, of how it is for you. You have an outburst, then calm down. Someone, calmly picks up the lead a while later, and you tell them not now, I'm fine, go away. And then you tell everyone that you're being baited all the time. Rules are rules, and two particular members seem to find that it's quite effective to call those they're not keen on, on these rules when they feel their timing is ripe. Lots of people like myself, whether on a forum or in real life, choose to let things slide, and then when an opportunity presents itself, they will quite naturally bring up stuff from the past. What's so weird about that? Nothing. Most conscientious people don't use the rules to d.ick with 'their enemies' and some do. It's those who 'use' the rules who have the police/authorities in the palms of their hands, playin' it for all it's worth. Some value system, huh.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2013 15:10:03 GMT -5
That is not what you are on about in your post to Peter.
Though what you are now writing about, is the majority, of how it is for you. You have an outburst, then calm down. Someone, calmly picks up the lead a while later, and you tell them not now, I'm fine, go away. And then you tell everyone that you're being baited all the time. Rules are rules, and two particular members seem to find that it's quite effective to call those they're not keen on, on these rules when they feel their timing is ripe. Lots of people like myself, whether on a forum or in real life, choose to let things slide, and then when an opportunity presents itself, they will quite naturally bring up stuff from the past. What's so weird about that? Nothing. Most conscientious people don't use the rules to d.ick with 'their enemies' and some do. It's those who 'use' the rules who have the police/authorities in the palms of their hands, playin' it for all it's worth. Some value system, huh. What you are writing now is moving even further away from what you were saying 6 hours ago. I'm not interested in your ranting, I have given you an open opportunity to clear up whatever you wanted to imply in that post.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2013 15:11:28 GMT -5
Do you feel it's because the master-baiters, and their new sidekick, wren, knew Peter was out of town? You really are unreal.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2013 15:12:58 GMT -5
That is not what you are on about in your post to Peter.
Though what you are now writing about, is the majority, of how it is for you. You have an outburst, then calm down. Someone, calmly picks up the lead a while later, and you tell them not now, I'm fine, go away. And then you tell everyone that you're being baited all the time. Well, if creativity keeps the flow of life fresh and new, thus preventing inertia/ennui, which would therefore dispel habitual tendencies such as those you and your compadres employ, then I would have to conclude that these habitual endeavors are a product of the 'known,' or object referral awareness. There are a wealth of other options available to creativity, and real teachers are aware of its multi-faceted flow. Doing the same thing over and over again in the hope of achieving a different result is kinda, well, you know. Real teachers choose to resolve problems on a different plane than they were created on. It's a very creative act. Why are the addicted master-baiters so afraid to try something new? Fear?
|
|
|
Post by silver on Jul 9, 2013 15:18:32 GMT -5
Rules are rules, and two particular members seem to find that it's quite effective to call those they're not keen on, on these rules when they feel their timing is ripe. Lots of people like myself, whether on a forum or in real life, choose to let things slide, and then when an opportunity presents itself, they will quite naturally bring up stuff from the past. What's so weird about that? Nothing. Most conscientious people don't use the rules to d.ick with 'their enemies' and some do. It's those who 'use' the rules who have the police/authorities in the palms of their hands, playin' it for all it's worth. Some value system, huh. What you are writing now is moving even further away from what you were saying 6 hours ago. I'm not interested in your ranting, I have given you an open opportunity to clear up whatever you wanted to imply in that post. As if it were unclear to you. Now you accuse me of ranting. Hmm.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2013 15:21:51 GMT -5
Do you feel it's because the master-baiters, and their new sidekick, wren, knew Peter was out of town? You really are unreal. You're pretty predictable your own self, kid. Try exploring the territory without a map for a change. You might learn something worthwhile.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2013 15:24:50 GMT -5
You're pretty predictable your own self, kid. Try exploring the territory without a map for a change. You might learn something worthwhile. Hey now, wren is one of my fave mapless birds in these parts. It's the lateral mind moves where you shine too.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2013 15:29:01 GMT -5
You're pretty predictable your own self, kid. Try exploring the territory without a map for a change. You might learn something worthwhile. Hey now, wren is one of my fave mapless birds in these parts. It's the lateral mind moves where you shine too. I really never read her posts until she started on me. Can you direct me to something mapless, which wasn't ascribed to another in a video, or song lyric?
|
|
|
Post by quinn on Jul 9, 2013 15:43:19 GMT -5
Why isn't anyone addressing the content of their own post? It all sounds like "He/she did it first!" Sheesh.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2013 15:50:29 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2013 16:05:38 GMT -5
Something told me wren was a reincarnation of someone else when she started in on me without my having ever responded to a post of wren's prior to that moment. I have been pretty fully engaged with what tzu is sharing here, because we share a lot of the same insights. Thich, and maybe even Chopra appears to be the common ground. I read a lot of charliegee, andrew, and figgy when she's here, along with other friends, too. Farmer, when he gets off his dead ass and shows up. Thanks for the links, and I'm not diminishing. I have posted a few song lyrics in my time, and a music video or two. I usually do not have flash turned on when I'm here, and will only turn it on when I somewhat know the poster.
|
|
|
Post by silence on Jul 9, 2013 19:38:39 GMT -5
Response: I don't even know what a beedes is. I'd have assumed testical, except that he's "butted" it, and you wouldn't headbutt a testical. Haha, this just made opening this thread worth it.
|
|
|
Post by Beingist on Jul 9, 2013 19:40:36 GMT -5
Why isn't anyone addressing the content of their own post? It all sounds like "He/she did it first!" Sheesh. This is why I don't pay much mind to this kind of stuff. He said/she said. Not even amusing, anymore.
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on Jul 9, 2013 23:13:59 GMT -5
AndrewWhen dealing with people (such as yourself) whose spirituality/non-duality is wrong to the point of being harmful, I might confront them in a way that is spiritually incorrect. I'm sure Niz wasn't one to stand on ceremony himself. I see Enigma's non-duality as buffoonery to a great extent, but despite this, it seems to me that there is some level of positive contribution. At least he opens the way for an exploration of what non-duality and spirituality is all about. You like to keep your ontology hidden, and there is good reason for that, so aside from a few quotes here and there, what we get from you is mostly destructive. You shouldn't be posting in this section of the forum. Complain (Reefs): Crusade. Response: Disagree. You and Engima have been robustly ribbing Andrew for some time which this weekend's tirade of reporting posts may or may not be part of. This post of his is relatively civil and sets out his complaint quite clearly. I agree with his assertion that you cause more grief that joy in this forum and I don't have a problem with him bringing that up to you. Well, obviously I was referring to this part: You shouldn't be posting in this section of the forum. which came right after this one here: You don't belong in the moderated section
|
|
|
Post by Peter on Jul 10, 2013 2:58:45 GMT -5
I won't dumpster dive - as I've already said, my boredom level has reached maximum capacity on the moderated side. What I really had in mind was something wren posted a couple of days ago, but I can quite readily imagine the invisible crowd cheering 'her' on. I suggest you might want to see if 'she's legit - ip? Wren does surprise me quite often by not conforming to what I see as gender usual behaviour (like the post where she appears to coldly threaten that Trivedi fan - most emotive use of a comma I've seen in a long time), but I take that as being more about my issues of having expectation about how women should behave, which I quite appreciate having challenged. When I read back that particular thread, Kapilsharma came over as just as authoratative. Whether Wren is actually a women or a man (not that it matters), I've no reason to think that the Wren account is a sock puppet. If she's joined the Enigma "camp" or is just having a go at you in particular well that seems like her free choice to make. Aside from their (Reefs and Enigma) usual proddings, pokings, pestering, and baiting, they're quite gentlemanly. Yes, they do seem able to conduct something approaching a conversation without getting obviously abusive about it...
|
|