|
Post by Beingist on May 22, 2012 18:37:00 GMT -5
So interdasting that you didn't read the rest of the paragraph? Writers write for their own understanding. We're all unique. We don't have to see it your way. If writers write for their own understanding, does that mean that when they finally understand it, they put down their pen? ETA: or, could that just be the real cause of writer's block--not being able to write, because they actually know what they're talking about?
|
|
|
Post by living on May 22, 2012 18:57:56 GMT -5
Writers write for their own understanding. We're all unique. We don't have to see it your way. If writers write for their own understanding, does that mean that when they finally understand it, they put down their pen? ETA: or, could that just be the real cause of writer's block--not being able to write, because they actually know what they're talking about? Nice koan
|
|
|
Post by lemongrass on May 22, 2012 19:05:39 GMT -5
If writers write for their own understanding, does that mean that when they finally understand it, they put down their pen? ETA: or, could that just be the real cause of writer's block--not being able to write, because they actually know what they're talking about? Nice koan Uhm well depends on what you want to write about. Are you one of those believers in silent truth? There are definitely lots of things I don't know and just because I can't write them doesn't mean I know what they are about.
|
|
|
Post by living on May 22, 2012 19:08:25 GMT -5
Uhm well depends on what you want to write about. Are you one of those believers in silent truth? There are definitely lots of things I don't know and just because I can't write them doesn't mean I know what they are about. I know a helluva lot less than you do, so what's your point?
|
|
|
Post by lemongrass on May 22, 2012 19:13:31 GMT -5
Uhm well depends on what you want to write about. Are you one of those believers in silent truth? There are definitely lots of things I don't know and just because I can't write them doesn't mean I know what they are about. I know a helluva lot less than you do, so what's your point? How do you know that? Have you scanned my brain for all the information it contains? Or are you saying you are less attached to your knowledge than I am to mine? My point was to piss you off. I succeeded.
|
|
|
Post by living on May 22, 2012 19:17:09 GMT -5
I know a helluva lot less than you do, so what's your point? How do you know that? Have you scanned my brain for all the information it contains? Or are you saying you are less attached to your knowledge than I am to mine? My point was to piss you off. I succeeded. You didn't succeed at all. I'm still laughing about what I posted. In fact, it's the very first time I've ever selected the angry emoticon. Oh, the irony! ;D
|
|
|
Post by lemongrass on May 22, 2012 19:21:33 GMT -5
How do you know that? Have you scanned my brain for all the information it contains? Or are you saying you are less attached to your knowledge than I am to mine? My point was to piss you off. I succeeded. You didn't succeed at all. I'm still laughing about what I posted. In fact, it's the very first time I've ever selected the angry emoticon. Oh, the irony! ;D I did succeed. Also, I don't believe you.
|
|
|
Post by living on May 22, 2012 19:27:26 GMT -5
You didn't succeed at all. I'm still laughing about what I posted. In fact, it's the very first time I've ever selected the angry emoticon. Oh, the irony! ;D I did succeed. Also, I don't believe you. Ok, I'm game. How did you succeed? I'm not really interested in what you believe or don't believe. So, run with that one, too.
|
|
|
Post by lemongrass on May 22, 2012 19:32:17 GMT -5
You are interested in what I believe. That's why you keep responding to me, lying moron.
|
|
|
Post by living on May 22, 2012 19:45:09 GMT -5
You are interested in what I believe. That's why you keep responding to me, lying moron. LOL! It's conversation. You're not a conversationalist. I get it.
|
|
|
Post by lemongrass on May 22, 2012 20:24:41 GMT -5
You are interested in what I believe. That's why you keep responding to me, lying moron. LOL! It's conversation. You're not a conversationalist. I get it. As if you don't want to dominate the conversation yourself. I am a conversationalist, the type that wins at all the conversations. Once again, you prove yourself to be a lying moron.
|
|
|
Post by living on May 22, 2012 20:28:02 GMT -5
You are interested in what I believe. That's why you keep responding to me, lying moron. I am a conversationalist, the type that wins at all the conversations. How did you accomplish all of this? ;D
|
|
|
Post by lemongrass on May 22, 2012 20:32:28 GMT -5
I am a conversationalist, the type that wins at all the conversations. How did you accomplish all of this? ;D I was expressing myself accurately, or honestly. And since I pissed you off, I won. I already told you this. Please try to keep up. Or the lion will eat you.
|
|
|
Post by arisha on May 22, 2012 23:07:06 GMT -5
Being manipulated, controlled is one thing. HOW it is done is a different thing. HOW it is done looks very much like some...Oneness. In the sense that my BEING is LITERALLY his BEING, mentally. And vice versa. For ex., when I am typing these words I feel my fingers as if they were his. And I have the same feeling about my whole body. He is 'looking' via my eyes. He is taking part in this forum with me. Sometimes he sends me some thoughts or ideas. I can always know which thoughts are my own, and which ones are his. Isn't this feeling similar to some...Oneness? Everybody can be connected in this way. He showed those states to me. At the beginning too many states of mind, or feelings, or images, or thoughts-feelings -you cannot find words for, - are like switched on with the utmost clarity. But then the brain cannot stand it, and simply collapses. It cannot hold those billion images, or feelings about all, - simultaneously. Then one is able to perceive just nothing, - as somebody said,- the hole of the donut. The Channel can connect two, or more in Oneness. But, sure, not all, - it's too much for a human brain. It's a very special feeling - to be connected. I cannot find words to describe it in the exact way. Because the sensations are different. For ex., there is the sensation which I could call a volumetrical (?) breathing. Like a multidimensional breathing. Does it say anything to anybody? That's why I say I cannot describe many things that I feel. For ex., there are 2D pictures, and 3D pictures, 3D movies. Something like that. But much more complicated. Sometimes the sensation is just on the level of Energy, - but how to describe that? I say it again: first he showed me what he can do when me, him, and the Teacher met in person. Then, in several weeks, he started the Channel with me distantly. The Teacher had been connected before me, and he is still connected. No, oneness is neither a feeling nor a connection between parts. Where did I say it's a feeling? I said I didn't know what words could describe it. I also don't say that Oneness is a connection between parts. I said MrG' BEING and my BEING are the one. In the same way as you say about inseparateness when 'me' and 'the other' are one. Do you think I call it Oneness? No, I don't. I call it "some...Oneness" - just joking. Because there is something from your Oneness in it. Have you ever been really and literally inseparate with a person? No. But you say it's possible to realize Oneness and inseparateness. How can you say that if you don't know what it is? You have never experienced even the inseparateness of the type I am talking about.
|
|
|
Post by enigma on May 22, 2012 23:23:27 GMT -5
No, oneness is neither a feeling nor a connection between parts. Where did I say it's a feeling? "Isn't this feeling similar to some...Oneness?" " I can always know which thoughts are my own, and which ones are his. Isn't this feeling similar to some...Oneness? Everybody can be connected in this way. He showed those states to me. At the beginning too many states of mind, or feelings, or images, or thoughts-feelings -you cannot find words for, - are like switched on with the utmost clarity. But then the brain cannot stand it, and simply collapses. It cannot hold those billion images, or feelings about all, - simultaneously. Then one is able to perceive just nothing, - as somebody said,- the hole of the donut. The Channel can connect two, or more in Oneness. But, sure, not all, - it's too much for a human brain. It's a very special feeling - to be connected. I cannot find words to describe it in the exact way. Because the sensations are different. For ex., there is the sensation which I could call a volumetrical (?) breathing. Like a multidimensional breathing. Does it say anything to anybody? That's why I say I cannot describe many things that I feel. For ex., there are 2D pictures, and 3D pictures, 3D movies. Something like that. But much more complicated. Sometimes the sensation is just on the level of Energy, - but how to describe that?" I say it again: first he showed me what he can do when me, him, and the Teacher met in person. Then, in several weeks, he started the Channel with me distantly. The Teacher had been connected before me, and he is still connected. Oneness is also not an experience.
|
|