|
Post by runstill on May 20, 2012 10:14:47 GMT -5
'Hehe' I'll give you a hint, you could say its Ariasa's giraffe. I'm using giraffe in the context as 'giraffe spotting'
|
|
|
Post by Peter on May 20, 2012 10:53:12 GMT -5
Okay, well, sometimes, when I have questions (like, who exactly is this Mr. G under discussion) He's Arisha's Guru who she claims has her - somewhat reluctantly - under remote/telepathic mind control. See here and here.
|
|
|
Post by Beingist on May 20, 2012 12:46:30 GMT -5
Okay, well, sometimes, when I have questions (like, who exactly is this Mr. G under discussion) He's Arisha's Guru who she claims has her - somewhat reluctantly - under remote/telepathic mind control. See here and here. Ah. I see, now. Thank you, Peter. In light of this new information, it seems quite possible, then, that the man on the Mind Stuff cover really is MrG. Though, obviously, that would be up to arisha to reveal. I only posted that image, because it seems to fit the whole conceptualized visualization of 'mind stuff' (that, and I thought the idea of Roy Orbison reading minds was rather humorous).
|
|
|
Post by enigma on May 20, 2012 15:47:29 GMT -5
He's Arisha's Guru who she claims has her - somewhat reluctantly - under remote/telepathic mind control. See here and here. Ah. I see, now. Thank you, Peter. In light of this new information, it seems quite possible, then, that the man on the Mind Stuff cover really is MrG. Though, obviously, that would be up to arisha to reveal. I only posted that image, because it seems to fit the whole conceptualized visualization of 'mind stuff' (that, and I thought the idea of Roy Orbison reading minds was rather humorous). I didn't expect you to be stumped by the jocularity. You posted something once before and Arisha implied it was Mr G's doing. I don't recall eggzakly, but I thought you joined in the discussion of that serious matter. This is just deja-vu all over again.
|
|
|
Post by Beingist on May 20, 2012 16:26:27 GMT -5
Ah. I see, now. Thank you, Peter. In light of this new information, it seems quite possible, then, that the man on the Mind Stuff cover really is MrG. Though, obviously, that would be up to arisha to reveal. I only posted that image, because it seems to fit the whole conceptualized visualization of 'mind stuff' (that, and I thought the idea of Roy Orbison reading minds was rather humorous). I didn't expect you to be stumped by the jocularity. You posted something once before and Arisha implied it was Mr G's doing. I don't recall eggzakly, but I thought you joined in the discussion of that serious matter. This is just deja-vu all over again. Actually, in ... some other thread, some time ago, I was rather jocular about MrG, myself, but in all honesty, thought the reference was to ... well, something else. I'm clear on that, now. Carry on. All mind stuff.
|
|
|
Post by enigma on May 20, 2012 19:02:45 GMT -5
I didn't expect you to be stumped by the jocularity. You posted something once before and Arisha implied it was Mr G's doing. I don't recall eggzakly, but I thought you joined in the discussion of that serious matter. This is just deja-vu all over again. Actually, in ... some other thread, some time ago, I was rather jocular about MrG, myself, but in all honesty, thought the reference was to ... well, something else. I'm clear on that, now. Carry on. All mind stuff. Oh, okay, that sorta clears up the confusion a bit.
|
|
|
Post by silence on May 20, 2012 23:04:40 GMT -5
Ah. I see, now. Thank you, Peter. In light of this new information, it seems quite possible, then, that the man on the Mind Stuff cover really is MrG. Though, obviously, that would be up to arisha to reveal. I only posted that image, because it seems to fit the whole conceptualized visualization of 'mind stuff' (that, and I thought the idea of Roy Orbison reading minds was rather humorous). I didn't expect you to be stumped by the jocularity. You posted something once before and Arisha implied it was Mr G's doing. I don't recall eggzakly, but I thought you joined in the discussion of that serious matter. This is just deja-vu all over again. Isn't it obvious. Mr.G is messing with him and repeatedly wiping his memory clean.
|
|
|
Post by enigma on May 21, 2012 0:12:41 GMT -5
I didn't expect you to be stumped by the jocularity. You posted something once before and Arisha implied it was Mr G's doing. I don't recall eggzakly, but I thought you joined in the discussion of that serious matter. This is just deja-vu all over again. Isn't it obvious. Mr.G is messing with him and repeatedly wiping his memory clean. The best slave is the one who doesn't know he's being controlled. Pretty clever, that Mr G......
|
|
|
Post by arisha on May 21, 2012 0:36:25 GMT -5
MrG can really hear all you are saying... Or see what you are posting... He is taking part in these discussions pretty much. - By means of reading the stuff together with me. He is the manifestation of your favourite idea about Oneness, literally.
|
|
|
Post by silence on May 21, 2012 8:33:21 GMT -5
He is the manifestation of your favourite idea about Oneness, literally. What does that mean?
|
|
|
Post by arisha on May 22, 2012 0:03:04 GMT -5
He is the manifestation of your favourite idea about Oneness, literally. What does that mean? He has been having a telepathy Channel with me for many years. We are inseparate from each other mentally. It's hard to imagine but he is like literally the same as me, - this is the case when 'me' and 'the other' are merged in Oneness. My BEING is his BEING. No difference. WHAT IS with me is his WHAT IS. Not for a moment, or for five minutes, or even for five hours. This state has been lasting during 20 years. His IS and my IS - merged together in Oneness. I know it's hard to believe in that. I don't know how he is doing that. He said to me that he would make this Channel, and then he made it. He said it took him almost a month to make it, i.e. he had had to be making special efforts to be always connected until it started being done automatically.
|
|
|
Post by silence on May 22, 2012 0:30:27 GMT -5
He has been having a telepathy Channel with me for many years. We are inseparate from each other mentally. It's hard to imagine but he is like literally the same as me, - this is the case when 'me' and 'the other' are merged in Oneness. My BEING is his BEING. No difference. WHAT IS with me is his WHAT IS. Not for a moment, or for five minutes, or even for five hours. This state has been lasting during 20 years. His IS and my IS - merged together in Oneness. I know it's hard to believe in that. I don't know how he is doing that. He said to me that he would make this Channel, and then he made it. He said it took him almost a month to make it, i.e. he had had to be making special efforts to be always connected until it started being done automatically. So you and Mr.G have your own little personal oneness going on?
|
|
|
Post by enigma on May 22, 2012 0:53:13 GMT -5
He has been having a telepathy Channel with me for many years. We are inseparate from each other mentally. It's hard to imagine but he is like literally the same as me, - this is the case when 'me' and 'the other' are merged in Oneness. My BEING is his BEING. No difference. WHAT IS with me is his WHAT IS. Not for a moment, or for five minutes, or even for five hours. This state has been lasting during 20 years. His IS and my IS - merged together in Oneness. I know it's hard to believe in that. I don't know how he is doing that. He said to me that he would make this Channel, and then he made it. He said it took him almost a month to make it, i.e. he had had to be making special efforts to be always connected until it started being done automatically. Being manipulated, controlled and punished by another (that's how you have described your 'connection') has nothing at all to do with oneness. You are still separate from each other mentally, and your BEING is not his BEING. What you describe is just a psychic version of a master/slave relationship. Unless you can make him do stuff too, and punish him if he doesn't, and then it's just a different kind of game and still has nothing to do with oneness. Is that why you're obsessed with it? You think this psychic connection has something to do with oneness?
|
|
|
Post by arisha on May 22, 2012 1:31:10 GMT -5
He has been having a telepathy Channel with me for many years. We are inseparate from each other mentally. It's hard to imagine but he is like literally the same as me, - this is the case when 'me' and 'the other' are merged in Oneness. My BEING is his BEING. No difference. WHAT IS with me is his WHAT IS. Not for a moment, or for five minutes, or even for five hours. This state has been lasting during 20 years. His IS and my IS - merged together in Oneness. I know it's hard to believe in that. I don't know how he is doing that. He said to me that he would make this Channel, and then he made it. He said it took him almost a month to make it, i.e. he had had to be making special efforts to be always connected until it started being done automatically. Being manipulated, controlled and punished by another (that's how you have described your 'connection') has nothing at all to do with oneness. You are still separate from each other mentally, and your BEING is not his BEING. What you describe is just a psychic version of a master/slave relationship. Unless you can make him do stuff too, and punish him if he doesn't, and then it's just a different kind of game and still has nothing to do with oneness. Is that why you're obsessed with it? You think this psychic connection has something to do with oneness? Being manipulated, controlled is one thing. HOW it is done is a different thing. HOW it is done looks very much like some...Oneness. In the sense that my BEING is LITERALLY his BEING, mentally. And vice versa. For ex., when I am typing these words I feel my fingers as if they were his. And I have the same feeling about my whole body. He is 'looking' via my eyes. He is taking part in this forum with me. Sometimes he sends me some thoughts or ideas. I can always know which thoughts are my own, and which ones are his. Isn't this feeling similar to some...Oneness? Everybody can be connected in this way. He showed those states to me. At the beginning too many states of mind, or feelings, or images, or thoughts-feelings -you cannot find words for, - are like switched on with the utmost clarity. But then the brain cannot stand it, and simply collapses. It cannot hold those billion images, or feelings about all, - simultaneously. Then one is able to perceive just nothing, - as somebody said,- the hole of the donut. The Channel can connect two, or more in Oneness. But, sure, not all, - it's too much for a human brain. It's a very special feeling - to be connected. I cannot find words to describe it in the exact way. Because the sensations are different. For ex., there is the sensation which I could call a volumetrical (?) breathing. Like a multidimensional breathing. Does it say anything to anybody? That's why I say I cannot describe many things that I feel. For ex., there are 2D pictures, and 3D pictures, 3D movies. Something like that. But much more complicated. Sometimes the sensation is just on the level of Energy, - but how to describe that? I say it again: first he showed me what he can do when me, him, and the Teacher met in person. Then, in several weeks, he started the Channel with me distantly. The Teacher had been connected before me, and he is still connected.
|
|
|
Post by enigma on May 22, 2012 10:17:04 GMT -5
Being manipulated, controlled and punished by another (that's how you have described your 'connection') has nothing at all to do with oneness. You are still separate from each other mentally, and your BEING is not his BEING. What you describe is just a psychic version of a master/slave relationship. Unless you can make him do stuff too, and punish him if he doesn't, and then it's just a different kind of game and still has nothing to do with oneness. Is that why you're obsessed with it? You think this psychic connection has something to do with oneness? Being manipulated, controlled is one thing. HOW it is done is a different thing. HOW it is done looks very much like some...Oneness. In the sense that my BEING is LITERALLY his BEING, mentally. And vice versa. For ex., when I am typing these words I feel my fingers as if they were his. And I have the same feeling about my whole body. He is 'looking' via my eyes. He is taking part in this forum with me. Sometimes he sends me some thoughts or ideas. I can always know which thoughts are my own, and which ones are his. Isn't this feeling similar to some...Oneness? Everybody can be connected in this way. He showed those states to me. At the beginning too many states of mind, or feelings, or images, or thoughts-feelings -you cannot find words for, - are like switched on with the utmost clarity. But then the brain cannot stand it, and simply collapses. It cannot hold those billion images, or feelings about all, - simultaneously. Then one is able to perceive just nothing, - as somebody said,- the hole of the donut. The Channel can connect two, or more in Oneness. But, sure, not all, - it's too much for a human brain. It's a very special feeling - to be connected. I cannot find words to describe it in the exact way. Because the sensations are different. For ex., there is the sensation which I could call a volumetrical (?) breathing. Like a multidimensional breathing. Does it say anything to anybody? That's why I say I cannot describe many things that I feel. For ex., there are 2D pictures, and 3D pictures, 3D movies. Something like that. But much more complicated. Sometimes the sensation is just on the level of Energy, - but how to describe that? I say it again: first he showed me what he can do when me, him, and the Teacher met in person. Then, in several weeks, he started the Channel with me distantly. The Teacher had been connected before me, and he is still connected. No, oneness is neither a feeling nor a connection between parts.
|
|