|
|
Post by lolly on May 21, 2022 20:19:45 GMT -5
I guess you've heard about Musk being involved in this latest sex-for-horse mile-high club scandal. There's no end to fascinating Matrix stories, is there?  This is true, last month we cared about Ukraine, this month we care Amber pooping in bed, next month it'll be sex-for-horse. Does anyone even remember what it was before Ukraine? Was there a pandemic or something?
My guess is, if massage is an advantage for flight stewardess work, that's a dirty old man thing, but on the other hand, gold diggin hos be huslin. They're savages.
It all thrives on drama. The matrix got that wrong. In the matrix everyone lived perfect lives with perfect steaks and wines etc. But in the real matrix it's more like 'animal murder' - another issue to support. Slap yellow and blue on your profile, oh is that out of fashion now? Remember when BLM was a thing? It's drama, one after the other. The real matrix is energised by outrage.
|
|
|
|
Post by justlikeyou on May 22, 2022 16:46:13 GMT -5
The real matrix is energised by outrage. You would think that any sensible character would know dark energy when they see/feel it, and reject it. But alas, I am long aware that there are different strokes for different folks. |
|
|
|
Post by justlikeyou on May 22, 2022 19:05:31 GMT -5
"The deeper interconnectedness of all things and events implies that the mental labels of “good” and “bad” are ultimately illusory. They always imply a limited perspective and so are true only relatively and temporarily. This is illustrated in the story of a wise man who won an expensive car in a lottery. His family and friends were very happy for him and came to celebrate. "Isn't it great!" they said. "You are so lucky." The man smiled and said, "Maybe." For a few weeks he enjoyed driving the car. Then one day a drunken driver crashed into his new car at an intersection and he ended up in the hospital, with multiple injuries. His family and friends came to see him and said, "That was really unfortunate." Again the man smiled and said, "Maybe." While he was still in the hospital, one night there was a landslide and his house fell into the sea. Again his friends came the next day and said, "Weren't you lucky to have been here in hospital." Again he said, "Maybe." The wise man's "maybe" signifies a refusal to judge anything that happens. Instead of judging what is, he accepts it and so enters into conscious alignment with the higher order. He knows that often it is impossible for the mind to understand what place or purpose a seemingly random event has in the tapestry of the whole. But there are no random events, nor are there events or things that exist by and for themselves, in isolation. The atoms that make up your body were once forged inside stars, and the causes of even the smallest event are virtually infinite and connected with the whole in incomprehensible ways." -Eckhart Tolle |
|
|
|
Post by andrew on May 23, 2022 6:02:18 GMT -5
"The deeper interconnectedness of all things and events implies that the mental labels of “good” and “bad” are ultimately illusory. They always imply a limited perspective and so are true only relatively and temporarily. This is illustrated in the story of a wise man who won an expensive car in a lottery. His family and friends were very happy for him and came to celebrate. "Isn't it great!" they said. "You are so lucky." The man smiled and said, "Maybe." For a few weeks he enjoyed driving the car. Then one day a drunken driver crashed into his new car at an intersection and he ended up in the hospital, with multiple injuries. His family and friends came to see him and said, "That was really unfortunate." Again the man smiled and said, "Maybe." While he was still in the hospital, one night there was a landslide and his house fell into the sea. Again his friends came the next day and said, "Weren't you lucky to have been here in hospital." Again he said, "Maybe." The wise man's "maybe" signifies a refusal to judge anything that happens. Instead of judging what is, he accepts it and so enters into conscious alignment with the higher order. He knows that often it is impossible for the mind to understand what place or purpose a seemingly random event has in the tapestry of the whole. But there are no random events, nor are there events or things that exist by and for themselves, in isolation. The atoms that make up your body were once forged inside stars, and the causes of even the smallest event are virtually infinite and connected with the whole in incomprehensible ways." -Eckhart Tolle If PR counts for anything Elon had a very bad week. Calling an accuser a liar and taunting her to publically describe his junk is unlikely to inspire confidence with investors or board members. Well, in today's world, you can't just challenge the autocrats that want to abolish free speech, and not expect a ton of ad hominem and accusation in return. That's part of the strategy of abolishing free speech....basically scaring people into silence. I guess it won't just be one bad week of PR, but if he didn't expect it, then he's been naïve. Though could also be more 'matrix drama' to keep us hooked in. |
|
|
|
Post by lolly on May 23, 2022 7:34:17 GMT -5
Nothing will come of it. It's all sewn up with NDA's and what the supposed friend says is hearsay and inadmissible in court. Apparently there's some irregularities with Twitter not disclosing the bot count, which implies they probably falsified their public filings, and it looks like Musk might be reneging on buying Twitter over that. But full disclosure - I'd do it for a donkey.
|
|
|
|
Post by andrew on May 23, 2022 9:54:41 GMT -5
Well, in today's world, you can't just challenge the autocrats that want to abolish free speech, and not expect a ton of ad hominem and accusation in return. That's part of the strategy of abolishing free speech....basically scaring people into silence. I guess it won't just be one bad week of PR, but if he didn't expect it, then he's been naïve. Though could also be more 'matrix drama' to keep us hooked in. I don't think the facts support your conclusions  I don't think the 'powers that be' are out to get Elon.. I think he's under a lot of self inflicted stress... and that he has no one to blame but himself 'Out to get' may be a little strong.... I don't think they want him dead. But I can factually observe a strong movement now to discredit and demonize him in a number of ways. |
|
|
|
Post by justlikeyou on May 23, 2022 10:16:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by justlikeyou on May 23, 2022 10:39:23 GMT -5
Apparently you cared enough to post inaccurate information. |
|
|
|
Post by andrew on May 23, 2022 12:19:13 GMT -5
'Out to get' may be a little strong.... I don't think they want him dead. But I can factually observe a strong movement now to discredit and demonize him in a number of ways. he had more options in December of last year than he does today, he made a conscious decision to assert his influence and power.. and now he's getting the blowback (especially when he went full on political) he could have lived his life in luxury and as close to anonymity as he might have wanted but that's not what 'alpha males' do.. they want the attention, they want the fight. so he got one. no big mystery there. except in his case.. as the CEO of two major companies.. his personal public fights are harming the value and reputation of those entities.. which would have to be concerning to the people being negatively affected I don't disagree with that. As I said, I don't know if he understood exactly how the 'shaming/silencing' game is played on social media....he's probably had a lot more to do in the last 10 years than to notice how it is played. |
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on May 23, 2022 12:51:58 GMT -5
he had more options in December of last year than he does today, he made a conscious decision to assert his influence and power.. and now he's getting the blowback (especially when he went full on political) he could have lived his life in luxury and as close to anonymity as he might have wanted but that's not what 'alpha males' do.. they want the attention, they want the fight. so he got one. no big mystery there. except in his case.. as the CEO of two major companies.. his personal public fights are harming the value and reputation of those entities.. which would have to be concerning to the people being negatively affected I don't disagree with that. As I said, I don't know if he understood exactly how the 'shaming/silencing' game is played on social media....he's probably had a lot more to do in the last 10 years than to notice how it is played. Esther's latest standard reply is when she disagrees or doesn't want to discuss something and doesn't want to ruffle any feathers: "You're not wrong!" |
|
|
|
Post by laughter on May 23, 2022 13:40:48 GMT -5
"The deeper interconnectedness of all things and events implies that the mental labels of “good” and “bad” are ultimately illusory. They always imply a limited perspective and so are true only relatively and temporarily. This is illustrated in the story of a wise man who won an expensive car in a lottery. His family and friends were very happy for him and came to celebrate. "Isn't it great!" they said. "You are so lucky." The man smiled and said, "Maybe." For a few weeks he enjoyed driving the car. Then one day a drunken driver crashed into his new car at an intersection and he ended up in the hospital, with multiple injuries. His family and friends came to see him and said, "That was really unfortunate." Again the man smiled and said, "Maybe." While he was still in the hospital, one night there was a landslide and his house fell into the sea. Again his friends came the next day and said, "Weren't you lucky to have been here in hospital." Again he said, "Maybe." The wise man's "maybe" signifies a refusal to judge anything that happens. Instead of judging what is, he accepts it and so enters into conscious alignment with the higher order. He knows that often it is impossible for the mind to understand what place or purpose a seemingly random event has in the tapestry of the whole. But there are no random events, nor are there events or things that exist by and for themselves, in isolation. The atoms that make up your body were once forged inside stars, and the causes of even the smallest event are virtually infinite and connected with the whole in incomprehensible ways." -Eckhart Tolle If PR counts for anything Elon had a very bad week. Calling an accuser a liar and taunting her to publically describe his junk is unlikely to inspire confidence with investors or board members. If the shoe fits. You've put your straw musk into a double-bind. |
|
|
|
Post by laughter on May 23, 2022 14:15:53 GMT -5
If the shoe fits. You've put your straw musk into a double-bind. oh my, I've been busted. I don't know everything, sorry.
every opinion should be fact checked? that really sounds like a lot of work, man  Dint say that.  Just that if you deny an accusation, then you're at least implying that the accuser is a liar. The potential contrivance of a double-bind is to make the one denying the accusation pay an image price for the denial. |
|
|
|
Post by laughter on May 23, 2022 14:18:38 GMT -5
'Out to get' may be a little strong.... I don't think they want him dead. But I can factually observe a strong movement now to discredit and demonize him in a number of ways. he had more options in December of last year than he does today, he made a conscious decision to assert his influence and power.. and now he's getting the blowback (especially when he went full on political) he could have lived his life in luxury and as close to anonymity as he might have wanted but that's not what 'alpha males' do.. they want the attention, they want the fight. so he got one. no big mystery there. except in his case.. as the CEO of two major companies.. his personal public fights are harming the value and reputation of those entities.. which would have to be concerning to the people being negatively affected Other than his initial success with paypal his other two ventures were largely taxpayer funded. Never followed the details, but from what I have heard both Tesla and SpaceX had years and years of eyewatering losses that were all subsidized by government spending. Seems he's more a canary in a coal mine in that regard than anything else. It's just the uniparty flipping poles, nothing new under the Sun to see here. |
|
|
|
Post by andrew on May 23, 2022 14:20:55 GMT -5
I don't disagree with that. As I said, I don't know if he understood exactly how the 'shaming/silencing' game is played on social media....he's probably had a lot more to do in the last 10 years than to notice how it is played. you've changed the subject. apparently your interest is in the 'shaming/silencing on social media' and of Musk's offer to purchase twitter? my interest in his twitter offer is why he's now trying to renege on the deal.. ? and then disparaging the company in public makes him look bad, real bad My subject is Musk...I'm not aware of having changed the subject, but I don't know anything about the reneging beyond what lolly said above. I don't see a problem with him disparaging twitter, there's a lot to disparage! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 23, 2022 15:15:48 GMT -5
he had more options in December of last year than he does today, he made a conscious decision to assert his influence and power.. and now he's getting the blowback (especially when he went full on political) he could have lived his life in luxury and as close to anonymity as he might have wanted but that's not what 'alpha males' do.. they want the attention, they want the fight. so he got one. no big mystery there. except in his case.. as the CEO of two major companies.. his personal public fights are harming the value and reputation of those entities.. which would have to be concerning to the people being negatively affected Other than his initial success with paypal his other two ventures were largely taxpayer funded. Never followed the details, but from what I have heard both Tesla and SpaceX had years and years of eyewatering losses that were all subsidized by government spending. Seems he's more a canary in a coal mine in that regard than anything else. It's just the uniparty flipping poles, nothing new under the Sun to see here.  I think the story of his starting SpaceX was pretty cool. Not 100% sure either, but I believe he put his own money in and was on the verge of going bankrupt and under horrid stress. Multiple rockets had failed (exploded), and they got it working in the nick of time. Yes, *then* they got the government contracts, but if they had failed they would have gone down the drain and the government would have stuck with Boeing, ULA, etc. |
|
Just that if you deny an accusation, then you're at least implying that the accuser is a liar. The potential contrivance of a double-bind is to make the one denying the accusation pay an image price for the denial. 