|
Post by krsnaraja on Jan 22, 2020 0:59:30 GMT -5
I did not say they are different, they are one. One and different isn't a contradiction. Achintya-Bheda-Abheda (अचिन्त्यभेदाभेद, acintyabhedābheda in IAST) is a school of Vedanta representing the philosophy of inconceivable one-ness and difference. In Sanskrit achintya means 'inconceivable', bheda translates as 'difference', and abheda translates as 'non-difference'.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2020 2:26:30 GMT -5
From a LOA perspective, trying to make personal decisions based on statistics of others is classic loserthink because what happens to someone else has nothing to do with you. You cannot create in their reality and they cannot create in your reality - unless (!) you make their reality your own personal business and vice versa. Then you are linked together and depending on the degree that happens you will have similar/identical experiences. And that, unfortunately, is usually the case. So, no mater how 'scientifically/mathematically' accurate these statistics come across, these are just models, meaning what they predict, on an average/collective level, may prove quite accurate, but on an individual level, basically anything goes because in the end it is always the individual who decides where he/she allows it to go or not to go (be that consciously or unconsciously). So don't lose your minds over these numbers. Make your own statistics instead as they relate specifically to you and your family. There is no your reality and their reality. There is no such separation exist. We are not co-creating here. Everything moves as one.
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on Mar 30, 2020 1:42:58 GMT -5
From a LOA perspective, trying to make personal decisions based on statistics of others is classic loserthink because what happens to someone else has nothing to do with you. You cannot create in their reality and they cannot create in your reality - unless (!) you make their reality your own personal business and vice versa. Then you are linked together and depending on the degree that happens you will have similar/identical experiences. And that, unfortunately, is usually the case. So, no mater how 'scientifically/mathematically' accurate these statistics come across, these are just models, meaning what they predict, on an average/collective level, may prove quite accurate, but on an individual level, basically anything goes because in the end it is always the individual who decides where he/she allows it to go or not to go (be that consciously or unconsciously). So don't lose your minds over these numbers. Make your own statistics instead as they relate specifically to you and your family. There is no your reality and their reality. There is no such separation exist. We are not co-creating here. Everything moves as one. The obvious context mix in your reply aside, I don't see how one has to exclude the other (unless you are a solipsist, of course).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 30, 2020 3:16:35 GMT -5
There is no your reality and their reality. There is no such separation exist. We are not co-creating here. Everything moves as one. The obvious context mix in your reply aside, I don't see how one has to exclude the other (unless you are a solipsist, of course). When I use the word 'co-create', are you not clear that I am considering other one is real?
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on Mar 30, 2020 10:37:16 GMT -5
The obvious context mix in your reply aside, I don't see how one has to exclude the other (unless you are a solipsist, of course). When I use the word 'co-create', are you not clear that I am considering other one is real? That's exactly the flaw in your reasoning. I use the term co-creation the way A-H use it, i.e. in the impersonal LOA context, not just in the personal/deliberate creation context as you may have been erroneously assuming. And in that sense, co-creation is more about rendezvousing than free will or other perceivers. You can rendezvous with your computer, a rain shower or a traffic light or your wife, your stepford wife, your dreamy-weamy wife or your appearing wife. Doesn't matter who/what is real (aka a perceiver) or not. The same principles apply across the board for both the solipsist as well as the non-solipsist. In case of there being a perceiver it's just a different order of complexity, that's all.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 30, 2020 23:39:53 GMT -5
When I use the word 'co-create', are you not clear that I am considering other one is real? That's exactly the flaw in your reasoning. I use the term co-creation the way A-H use it, i.e. in the impersonal LOA context, not just in the personal/deliberate creation context as you may have been erroneously assuming. And in that sense, co-creation is more about rendezvousing than free will or other perceivers. You can rendezvous with your computer, a rain shower or a traffic light or your wife, your stepford wife, your dreamy-weamy wife or your appearing wife. Doesn't matter who/what is real (aka a perceiver) or not. The same principles apply across the board for both the solipsist as well as the non-solipsist. In case of there being a perceiver it's just a different order of complexity, that's all. What is Impersonal LOA context? Can you explain me?
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on Mar 31, 2020 9:02:58 GMT -5
What is Impersonal LOA context? Can you explain me? Like attracts like.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 31, 2020 10:01:53 GMT -5
What is Impersonal LOA context? Can you explain me? Like attracts like. let me understand first.
what I feel, I will attract the same feeling, right?
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on Mar 31, 2020 10:45:49 GMT -5
let me understand first. what I feel, I will attract the same feeling, right?
Feelings would be the personal level. And feelings just indicate your state of being. So you are not actually attracting feelings, but what you attract will result in a feeling. In that sense, there's no such thing as good or bad feelings.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 31, 2020 11:05:31 GMT -5
let me understand first. what I feel, I will attract the same feeling, right?
Feelings would be the personal level. And feelings just indicate your state of being. So you are not actually attracting feelings, but what you attract will result in a feeling. In that sense, there's no such thing as good or bad feelings. Then what do you mean by like attracts like?
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Apr 2, 2020 10:58:17 GMT -5
From a LOA perspective, trying to make personal decisions based on statistics of others is classic loserthink because what happens to someone else has nothing to do with you. You cannot create in their reality and they cannot create in your reality - unless (!) you make their reality your own personal business and vice versa. Then you are linked together and depending on the degree that happens you will have similar/identical experiences. And that, unfortunately, is usually the case. So, no mater how 'scientifically/mathematically' accurate these statistics come across, these are just models, meaning what they predict, on an average/collective level, may prove quite accurate, but on an individual level, basically anything goes because in the end it is always the individual who decides where he/she allows it to go or not to go (be that consciously or unconsciously). So don't lose your minds over these numbers. Make your own statistics instead as they relate specifically to you and your family. There is no your reality and their reality. There is no such separation exist. We are not co-creating here. Everything moves as one. Unique experiences (or the appearance of such) don't imply separation.
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on Apr 2, 2020 11:45:20 GMT -5
Feelings would be the personal level. And feelings just indicate your state of being. So you are not actually attracting feelings, but what you attract will result in a feeling. In that sense, there's no such thing as good or bad feelings. Then what do you mean by like attracts like? Like vibration.
|
|
|
Post by stardustpilgrim on Apr 4, 2020 12:41:45 GMT -5
Feelings would be the personal level. And feelings just indicate your state of being. So you are not actually attracting feelings, but what you attract will result in a feeling. In that sense, there's no such thing as good or bad feelings. Then what do you mean by like attracts like? The chief means of happiness in life is to not make requirements. That is, not to have expectations concerning anything, not in relation to things nor events nor people. Concerning people, this also means not keeping accounts. It also means to forgive, this mostly for oneself. Why? Because the universe operates on the principle if resonance, what you "broadcast" is what you will eventually receive. IOW, in one way or another results are always tied to your actions (they are essentially one and the same). Nevertheless, nothing is guaranteed. IOW, you are owed nothing. (This is one meaning of time, the illusion of no-connection).
|
|