|
Post by krsnaraja on Feb 8, 2019 13:44:09 GMT -5
Every being's feet is made after the image of God's feet. Without God's feet every being is without feet. Do all your patients walk to your surgery? Only select usually during summer. When there are no classes. Boy patients age between 7 and 18 walk to my clinic for circumcision.
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Feb 8, 2019 14:14:43 GMT -5
God is Love. Love is good. Patients want to be healed by God who is Love. They approach the doctor because he is as good as God. Therefore the doctor is love. You're really close to admitting that your patients are God. Akchuly, it sounds like he's saying he is God.
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Feb 8, 2019 14:18:30 GMT -5
Must be what happened. What else could it be? The palmist mentioned to my mother, " If you want this to stop, if your next pregnancy won't be aborted, let me slash the palms of your son's hands so the crocodiles are killed." Alas, my mother refused. She would no longer bear a child again when her Obstetrician removed her uterus. Oh, Lordy!
|
|
|
Post by krsnaraja on Feb 8, 2019 17:38:51 GMT -5
Only select usually during summer. When there are no classes. Boy patients age between 7 and 18 walk to my clinic for circumcision. And the feet that these young boys walk on, to get cut by your hands. Those feet wouldn't exist without God's idea of what feet are. Did I get that right? These feet the Boys have are stamped with God's feet. Same thing they did to Child Jesus whose bird was cut at 8 days old.
|
|
|
Post by krsnaraja on Feb 8, 2019 20:22:41 GMT -5
These feet the Boys have are stamped with God's feet. Same thing they did to Child Jesus whose bird was cut at 8 days old. Is Marco employed by the National Health Service in the UK? He works in a private hospital as OR nurse.
|
|
|
Post by krsnaraja on Feb 8, 2019 21:24:58 GMT -5
He works in a private hospital as OR nurse. He may have a very different perspective on childhood circumcision than you by now. "A national survey on sexual attitudes in 2000 found that 15.8% of men or boys in the United Kingdom (ages 16–44) were circumcised by their parents' choosing. 11.7% of 16- to 19-year-olds, and 19.6% of 40- to 44-year-olds said they had been circumcised. Apart from black Caribbeans, men born overseas were more likely to be circumcised.[42] Rickwood et al. reported that the proportion of English boys circumcised for medical reasons had fallen from 35% in the early 1930s to 6.5% by the mid-1980s. An estimated 3.8% of male children in the UK in 2000 were being circumcised by the age of 15.[43] The researchers stated that too many boys, especially under the age of 5, were still being circumcised because of a misdiagnosis of phimosis. They called for a target to reduce the percentage to 2%." en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prevalence_of_circumcisionMajority of Filipino males in Philippines are circumcised. My Physician father circumcised me at 9. In turn I circumcised my two boys when they turned 8. Maybe its something to do when male parents are circumcised they too want to circumcise their male children. There are many British male parents who are uncircumcised and so there male children are.
|
|
|
Post by krsnaraja on Feb 9, 2019 4:16:59 GMT -5
Majority of Filipino males in Philippines are circumcised. My Physician father circumcised me at 9. In turn I circumcised my two boys when they turned 8. Maybe its something to do when male parents are circumcised they too want to circumcise their male children. There are many British male parents who are uncircumcised and so there male children are. You've drawn your conclusion so that's the end of it. Let's proceed to another topic.
|
|
|
Post by krsnaraja on Feb 10, 2019 1:08:11 GMT -5
You've drawn your conclusion so that's the end of it. Let's proceed to another topic. Attachments:
|
|
|
Post by krsnaraja on Feb 11, 2019 18:12:39 GMT -5
Let's proceed to another topic. The Presence Being present every day in class until the end of the term chances the professor will give the always present student a paasing grade. Being always present in one's job pleases the boss. The presence of the hubby in home makes the wife happy. Since we can't be present in two places physically at the same time, it's not possible to please the wife and boss at the same day. Similarly when the mind is regularly present with the self /God is considered to have achieved the so - called Oneness.
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Feb 11, 2019 18:58:27 GMT -5
The Presence Being present every day in class until the end of the term chances the professor will give the always present student a paasing grade. Being always present in one's job pleases the boss. The presence of the hubby in home makes the wife happy. Since we can't be present in two places physically at the same time, it's not possible to please the wife and boss at the same day. Similarly when the mind is regularly present with the self /God is considered to have achieved the so - called Oneness. Oneness isn't an achievement and presence isn't a mind doing.
|
|
|
Post by krsnaraja on Feb 11, 2019 19:24:55 GMT -5
The Presence Being present every day in class until the end of the term chances the professor will give the always present student a paasing grade. Being always present in one's job pleases the boss. The presence of the hubby in home makes the wife happy. Since we can't be present in two places physically at the same time, it's not possible to please the wife and boss at the same day. Similarly when the mind is regularly present with the self /God is considered to have achieved the so - called Oneness. Oneness isn't an achievement and presence isn't a mind doing. For some it's an achievement. You have another definition of presence, I guess.
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on Feb 12, 2019 5:35:40 GMT -5
Oneness isn't an achievement and presence isn't a mind doing. For some it's an achievement. You have another definition of presence, I guess. Actually, his definition is the standard definition as it is used in non-duality (and many other spiritual schools of thought). Another word would be 'immediacy' - meaning no intermediary. Yet another word would be 'eternity'. These are all words that point to something prior to mind (and the SVP) which is prior to space and time and so these definitions may differ from the ordinary dictionary definitions (which typically refer to experience as defined by time and space).
|
|
|
Post by krsnaraja on Feb 12, 2019 7:18:41 GMT -5
For some it's an achievement. You have another definition of presence, I guess. Actually, his definition is the standard definition as it is used in non-duality (and many other spiritual schools of thought). Another word would be 'immediacy' - meaning no intermediary. Yet another word would be 'eternity'. These are all words that point to something prior to mind (and the SVP) which is prior to space and time and so these definitions may differ from the ordinary dictionary definitions (which typically refer to experience as defined by time and space). So, presence is not a person, place or thing. Its unmanifest the unborn. One without a second. Its absolute. You mean presence is God?
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on Feb 12, 2019 8:39:17 GMT -5
So, presence is not a person, place or thing. Right. Its unmanifest the unborn. One without a second. Its absolute. You mean presence is God? I don' know what your definition of 'God' is but all we can do is point because presence - like anything else that refers to some 'thing' (or some 'nothing') that is prior to mind - can't be objectified. And the pointing is probably going to be a lot more successful if we point to what 'it' is not instead of what 'it' actually is. You can attempt to describe it but you won't be able to define it. So words are going to fail us here. It's more a state of functioning or state of being anyway. In fact, some would call it our natural state of being. It belongs to the absolute realm, yes. And what comes closest in describing presence (the way we mean it here) in the relative realm is probably flow.
|
|
|
Post by krsnaraja on Feb 12, 2019 9:01:07 GMT -5
So, presence is not a person, place or thing. Right. Its unmanifest the unborn. One without a second. Its absolute. You mean presence is God? I don' know what your definition of 'God' is but all we can do is point because presence - like anything else that refers to some 'thing' (or some 'nothing') that is prior to mind - can't be objectified. And the pointing is probably going to be a lot more successful if we point to what 'it' is not instead of what 'it' actually is. You can attempt to describe it but you won't be able to define it. So words are going to fail us here. It's more a state of functioning or state of being anyway. In fact, some would call it our natural state of being. It belongs to the absolute realm, yes. And what comes closest in describing presence (the way we mean it here) in the relative realm is probably flow. Since its quite difficult to understand or describe presence, its conceived that it has taken a form. The Supreme Personality of Godhead / Krishna has 65 transcendental qualities in fullness. They are as deep as the ocean. The extent of His qualities is inconceivable. Chaitanya Mahāprabhu briefly describes various qualities of Lord Krishna to Sanātana Gosvāmī in Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta, Madhya-līlā, Chapter 23. These verses are also found in the Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu. CC Madhya 23.70 – Krishna, the supreme hero, has the most beautiful transcendental body. This body possesses all good features. It is radiant and very pleasing to the eyes. His body is powerful, strong and youthful. CC Madhya 23.71 — Krishna is the linguist of all wonderful languages. He is a truthful and very pleasing speaker. He is expert in speaking, and He is a very wise, learned scholar and a genius. CC Madhya 23.72 — Krishna is very expert in artistic enjoyment. He is highly cunning, expert, grateful and firmly determined in His vows. He knows how to deal according to time, person and country, and He sees through the scriptures and authoritative books. He is very clean and self-controlled. CC Madhya 23.73 — Lord Krishna is steady, His senses are controlled, and He is forgiving, grave and calm. He is also equal to all. Moreover, He is magnanimous, religious, chivalrous and kind. He is always respectful to respectable people. CC Madhya 23.74 — Krishna is very simple and liberal, He is humble and bashful, and He is the protector of the surrendered souls. He is very happy, and He is always the well-wisher of His devotees. He is all-auspicious, and He is submissive to love. CC Madhya 23.75 — Krishna is very influential and famous, and He is the object of attachment for everyone. He is the shelter of the good and the virtuous. He is attractive to the minds of women, and He is worshiped by everyone. He is very, very rich. CC Madhya 23.76 — Krishna is the Supreme, and He is always glorified as the Supreme Lord and controller. Thus all the previously mentioned transcendental qualities are in Him. The fifty qualities of the Supreme Personality of Godhead mentioned above are as deep as an ocean. In other words, they are difficult to fully comprehend. CC Madhya 23.77 These qualities are sometimes very minutely exhibited in living beings, but they are fully manifested in the Supreme Personality of Godhead.’ CC Madhya 23.78 — Apart from these fifty qualities, there are five other qualities found in the Supreme Personality of Godhead that are partially present in demigods like Śiva. CC Madhya 23.79-81 — ‘These qualities are (1) the Lord is always situated in His original position, (2) He is omniscient, (3) He is always fresh and youthful, (4) He is the concentrated form of eternity, knowledge and bliss, and (5) He is the possessor of all mystic perfection. There are another five qualities, which exist in the Vaikuṇṭha planets in Nārāyaṇa, the Lord of Lakṣmī. These qualities are also present in Krishna, but they are not present in demigods like Lord Śiva or in other living entities. These are (1) the Lord possesses inconceivable supreme power, (2) He generates innumerable universes from His body, (3) He is the original source of all incarnations, (4) He bestows salvation upon enemies He kills, and (5) He has the ability to attract exalted persons who are satisfied in themselves. Although these qualities are present in Nārāyaṇa, the dominating Deity of the Vaikuṇṭha planets, they are even more wonderfully present in Krishna.
|
|