|
Post by andrew on Sept 14, 2016 11:59:14 GMT -5
If one morning you forget to put your glasses on, and then you remember, do you tell that chain of stories about your glasses? Or is the story, 'Oh, I have to put my glasses on'? WOW! One thing I've noticed is that you quite often ignore certain questions and often provide answers to questions that haven't been asked. You also sometimes make false claims about not being understood. When you go through your day interacting with people, doing your work, eating food, washing, bathing....you are constantly assuming the existence of a world. Within the context of that assumption it is true to say that gopal is from India and likes to watch movies and drink tea. Do you agree with that?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 14, 2016 12:03:50 GMT -5
One thing I've noticed is that you quite often ignore certain questions and often provide answers to questions that haven't been asked. You also sometimes make false claims about not being understood. When you go through your day interacting with people, doing your work, eating food, washing, bathing....you are constantly assuming the existence of a world. Within the context of that assumption it is true to say that gopal is from India and likes to watch movies and drink tea. Do you agree with that? You continue to show the ignorance towards what I am writing. What else can I do? You see people like pilgrims disagree with me but atleast he is understanding me. In your nightly dream you are seeing many things, are you seeing through your physical eyes?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 14, 2016 12:04:38 GMT -5
Yes, you said it didn't matter if it is an appearance or not, which I agree with incidentally, and I assumed gopal would agree. But he came back and said it does matter. I'm none the wiser. So that presupposes that knowledge of whether it is appearance or not is useful in some way. Well as it happens I asked gopal just that question about six months ago about how this knowledge was useful and he said it wasn't. It was just a subject that interested him. We know that because he talks about it incessantly. And we know that you intrude every time here unnecessarily even though you know it's not a useful topic. The problem here is, you are not talking any useful topic here. You are also coming here to enjoy arguing,More than that you would make sure argument keeps goes on by making your agreement and disagreement accordingly. When you know you failed with your understanding or when you know you are at failing end, you would shout like this is not a useful topic. Remember you are not talking any useful topic either. I'm just telling it how it is buddy. Put your own house in order.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 14, 2016 12:06:53 GMT -5
And we know that you intrude every time here unnecessarily even though you know it's not a useful topic. The problem here is, you are not talking any useful topic here. You are also coming here to enjoy arguing,More than that you would make sure argument keeps goes on by making your agreement and disagreement accordingly. When you know you failed with your understanding or when you know you are at failing end, you would shout like this is not a useful topic. Remember you are not talking any useful topic either. I'm just telling it how it is buddy. Put your own house in order. Henceforth don't participate useless discussion,ok? Wait until someone discuss about meditation or anything related to that, but unfortunately this thread is not for that.
|
|
|
Post by andrew on Sept 14, 2016 12:13:04 GMT -5
One thing I've noticed is that you quite often ignore certain questions and often provide answers to questions that haven't been asked. You also sometimes make false claims about not being understood. When you go through your day interacting with people, doing your work, eating food, washing, bathing....you are constantly assuming the existence of a world. Within the context of that assumption it is true to say that gopal is from India and likes to watch movies and drink tea. Do you agree with that? You continue to show the ignorance towards what I am writing. What else can I do? You see people like pilgrims disagree with me but atleast he is understanding me. In your nightly dream you are seeing many things, are you seeing through your physical eyes? Do you see that you didn't answer the simple question I asked and threw in the old ignorance thing again. You just posted on Facebook a table tennis video. Is it true that you thought it was a good demonstration of table tennis? Is it true that you like posting on Facebook? Areyou assuming the existence of an Andrew that sleeps at night and has a highly dream? In the context of the dream, dream andrew is seeing through physical eyes, yes. He is not seeing through his feet. Could you answer the question I asked in the previous message please.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 14, 2016 12:22:51 GMT -5
You continue to show the ignorance towards what I am writing. What else can I do? You see people like pilgrims disagree with me but atleast he is understanding me. In your nightly dream you are seeing many things, are you seeing through your physical eyes? Do you see that you didn't answer the simple question I asked and threw in the old ignorance thing again. You just posted on Facebook a table tennis video. Is it true that you thought it was a good demonstration of table tennis? Is it true that you like posting on Facebook?
Areyou assuming the existence of an Andrew that sleeps at night and has a highly dream? In the context of the dream, dream andrew is seeing through physical eyes, yes. He is not seeing through his feet. Could you answer the question I asked in the previous message please. I have just answered. I like the way that guy moves here and there very fast to hit the ball, that's what I shared that video on facebook. In your nightly dream you are seeing through your physical eye? huh?
|
|
|
Post by andrew on Sept 14, 2016 12:22:53 GMT -5
Oka, so when I asked you a question of Facebook you replied in a reasonable way that suggests that you assume the existence of a world, and that it is true within that context that there is some amazing stuff happening. Yet here, you won't answer a question in a reasonable way. Why? What is different here?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 14, 2016 12:23:39 GMT -5
I'm just telling it how it is buddy. Put your own house in order. Henceforth don't participate useless discussion,ok? Wait until someone discuss about meditation or anything related to that, but unfortunately this thread is not for that.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 14, 2016 12:24:00 GMT -5
Oka, so when I asked you a question of Facebook you replied in a reasonable way that suggests that you assume the existence of a world, and that it is true within that context that there is some amazing stuff happening. Yet here, you won't answer a question in a reasonable way. Why? What is different here? I have been answering all your question in a very reasonable way. But you don't seems to be getting me.
|
|
|
Post by andrew on Sept 14, 2016 12:28:32 GMT -5
Do you see that you didn't answer the simple question I asked and threw in the old ignorance thing again. You just posted on Facebook a table tennis video. Is it true that you thought it was a good demonstration of table tennis? Is it true that you like posting on Facebook?
Areyou assuming the existence of an Andrew that sleeps at night and has a highly dream? In the context of the dream, dream andrew is seeing through physical eyes, yes. He is not seeing through his feet. Could you answer the question I asked in the previous message please. I have just answered. I like the way that guy moves here and there very fast to hit the ball, that's what I shared that video on facebook. In your nightly dream you are seeing through your physical eye? huh? Okay so you are happy to assume that there are guys hitting balls and that they move fast. Yes it was amazing. So here you are talking in the relative context, in which some things are true and some are not. Relatively, it is true that there were guys playing table tennis and hitting the ball amazingly. Absolutely, the truth is different. In dreams that I have, they are very like waking state. I still taste with mouth, smell with nose etc. It is an experience and all experience is physical.
|
|
|
Post by andrew on Sept 14, 2016 12:41:26 GMT -5
Oka, so when I asked you a question of Facebook you replied in a reasonable way that suggests that you assume the existence of a world, and that it is true within that context that there is some amazing stuff happening. Yet here, you won't answer a question in a reasonable way. Why? What is different here? I have been answering all your question in a very reasonable way. But you don't seems to be getting me. The appearances in consciousness idea is simple. Did you assume the existence of the tennis players when you posted the video? Did you assume the existence of people on Facebook watching the video? Did you assume the existence of a computer? I'm willing to bet that you won't answer these questions and that is something I find interesting.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 14, 2016 12:42:14 GMT -5
I have just answered. I like the way that guy moves here and there very fast to hit the ball, that's what I shared that video on facebook. In your nightly dream you are seeing through your physical eye? huh? Okay so you are happy to assume that there are guys hitting balls and that they move fast. Yes it was amazing. So here you are talking in the relative context, in which some things are true and some are not. Relatively, itnis true that there were guys playing table tennis and hitting the ball amazingly. Absolutely, the truth is different. In dreams that I have, they are very like waking state. I still taste with mouth, smell with nose etc. It is an experience and all experience is physical.
|
|
|
Post by andrew on Sept 14, 2016 12:44:33 GMT -5
Okay so you are happy to assume that there are guys hitting balls and that they move fast. Yes it was amazing. So here you are talking in the relative context, in which some things are true and some are not. Relatively, itnis true that there were guys playing table tennis and hitting the ball amazingly. Absolutely, the truth is different. In dreams that I have, they are very like waking state. I still taste with mouth, smell with nose etc. It is an experience and all experience is physical. You think waking state is more real an experience than dream state? That's very ironic.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 14, 2016 12:46:20 GMT -5
I have been answering all your question in a very reasonable way. But you don't seems to be getting me. The appearances in consciousness idea is simple. Did you assume the existence of the tennis players when you posted the video? Did you assume the existence of people on Facebook watching the video? Did you assume the existence of a computer? I'm willing to bet that you won't answer these questions and that is something I find interesting. I can't know whether those players exist, because there may be a chance that they might be a figments in my consciousness.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 14, 2016 12:47:27 GMT -5
You think waking state is more real an experience than dream state? That's very ironic. 'More real' is the wrong word. I said Reality moves pretty stable compared to dream world, but both are simply a dream happening in consciousness.
|
|