|
Post by figgles on Jun 2, 2015 22:15:57 GMT -5
You might want to elaborate a bit more on that, I am not relating working through and understanding sufferings in relation to self / Self with the colour of my foot in the auric sense . Well, there's yer problem right there. Come on E...fess up!...what's the auric color of left middle toe?
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Jun 2, 2015 22:21:09 GMT -5
I'm saying infinite potential is infinite. What would you say are the limitations of infinite potential? Logic, maybe? You are assuming, how do you know that's an infinite potential? All you can know you exist and everything is appearing to you. It's a infinite potential or finite potential are all assumption you are making. how could you assume someone can fly when reality has never allowed anyone to do so? I see that there is no limiter on what can appear in consciousness. It is a direct expression of unlimited Beingness. The appearance is a manifestation of notions of limitation, which even here are insisted upon and repeated endlessly, but the form which the expression can take is not limited. There is no objective world constrained by laws of functionality which cannot be violated. I can see what is not so, and 'God' is not so constrained.
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Jun 2, 2015 22:44:24 GMT -5
I don't understand this, of course, but you will. From the comments I get that there is someone in the back room typing up a leaf as the questions are answered. Yeah I can understand,it's my language(Tamil). Actually he is saying what are the ways they are deceiving and what are the ways they are making these Olas appears as if it's 5000 years old. But he doesn't explaine how did they found the truth about other people, in fact in one place he explains like they are collecting the details from the Car driver or Auto drivers but It's not that easy, tomorrow you may come here to my place, I may take you to that place, how come they know who you are and every detail about you? You might find it interesting to explore what we call cold reading. In particular, you might enjoy Derren Brown's cold reading at 6 minutes. (He openly admits it's trickery)
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Jun 2, 2015 22:50:46 GMT -5
You are assuming, how do you know that's an infinite potential? All you can know you exist and everything is appearing to you. It's a infinite potential or finite potential are all assumption you are making. how could you assume someone can fly when reality has never allowed anyone to do so? One way to look at it is this: if existence is un-boundaried i.e infinite, then logically, anything has to be possible. IF no-one has flown (and we don't that for sure), it would be a matter of individual and collective belief and agreement. In a way, the particular physical experience that we have all shared, just hasn't supported that action. For as long as people believe that existence is one of finite potential, and that we are governed by laws that have nothing at all to do with us, then we will experience being at the mercy of those laws, and at the mercy of nature/life. What is theoretically possible will remain very improbable. You believe in LOA, you should be on board with the idea of manifesting anything. You don't just have the theoretical ability to create a flying experience, you have the theoretical ability to create universes. Yes, it's interesting to me to see how quick folks are to reinforce their supposed boundaries on what is possible, based entirely on their experience of what has happened in the past. This is how limitation is enforced on a global scale, which in a way is quite an accomplishment.
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Jun 2, 2015 22:53:41 GMT -5
I don't understand exactly how it words. Did the guy write down a load of stuff 5000 years ago? If someone hasn't showed up, wouldn't their details still be in storage? In such case, he would not have written about them. Hes saying if someone he wrote about hasn't shown up YET, the leaf for that person would still be stored, waiting for him/her to show up. C'mon, this isn't rocket science.
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Jun 2, 2015 22:55:30 GMT -5
When I speak about working through issues in regards to what surfaces, I am referring to what had surfaced within my enquiry into self, not what peeps want to say about me on the forums . I only brush aside what doesn't resonate with me, like peeps telling me what supposed problems I have . Things surface day in day out but what surfaces with self enquiry are things that need to be worked through .. What I remained silent about regarding my realizations and experiences has no baring on your suggestion that I love finding self work to do . There is no foundation to your comments put to me . You do love finding self work to do. There is merit imagined at the end of your endless endurance tests. And this merit is what you are trying to parade in the forums. None of those points are without foundation. Yes, seems that way.
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Jun 2, 2015 22:58:15 GMT -5
One way to look at it is this: if existence is un-boundaried i.e infinite, then logically, anything has to be possible. IF no-one has flown (and we don't that for sure), it would be a matter of individual and collective belief and agreement. In a way, the particular physical experience that we have all shared, just hasn't supported that action. For as long as people believe that existence is one of finite potential, and that we are governed by laws that have nothing at all to do with us, then we will experience being at the mercy of those laws, and at the mercy of nature/life. What is theoretically possible will remain very improbable. You believe in LOA, you should be on board with the idea of manifesting anything. You don't just have the theoretical ability to create a flying experience, you have the theoretical ability to create universes. I don't have a problem with infinite, but we can't know whether it's infinite or not, in face, what does infinite means in this place? You can know. Limitations are illusions. Illusions can be seen for what they are.
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Jun 2, 2015 22:59:46 GMT -5
what's the meaning of cold reading? Sorry, something went horribly wrong with my link, but you've seen it by now.
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Jun 2, 2015 23:01:35 GMT -5
If it's a scam, nobody wrote anything until the time it is read, just as I said. This is not what you meant I know, but it's funny how it worked out.
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Jun 2, 2015 23:05:32 GMT -5
If I could, it wouldn't appear to be a law. You interpret a pattern that repeats reliably as a law that cannot be violated. You don't know that. So can you violate any law and show to me? If I could, it wouldn't appear to be a law. You interpret a pattern that repeats reliably as a law that cannot be violated. You don't know that.
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Jun 2, 2015 23:06:55 GMT -5
LOL.. yeah, that and more than 40 thousand posts, that Phrogg ain't let go of nuthin.. and, he runs a giraffe farm, too (RH).. I'd like to experience 10 minutes of the self-validation necessary to write such a thing.
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Jun 2, 2015 23:11:40 GMT -5
The expression of God. Gopal IS the expression. Yes, agree, but only to entice this particular expression or many expression like me? Gopal! All who are enticed by it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 2, 2015 23:20:28 GMT -5
In such case, he would not have written about them. Hes saying if someone he wrote about hasn't shown up YET, the leaf for that person would still be stored, waiting for him/her to show up. C'mon, this isn't rocket science. Oh ok, Yes correct then.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 2, 2015 23:26:11 GMT -5
what's the meaning of cold reading? Sorry, something went horribly wrong with my link, but you've seen it by now. Yes don't worry, I have seen it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 2, 2015 23:28:37 GMT -5
This is not what you meant I know, but it's funny how it worked out. That's not funny, but the way you imagine them to have worked is really funny.
|
|