|
Post by relinquish on Oct 7, 2013 4:26:52 GMT -5
When 'ONE' experiences 'ONE', 'ONE' seems to become 'TWO'. Between this apparent 'pair', 'Everything' happens.
|
|
|
Post by acewall on Oct 7, 2013 5:06:00 GMT -5
When 'ONE' experiences 'ONE', 'ONE' seems to become 'TWO'. Between this apparent 'pair', 'Everything' happens. good one. ego arises out of momentary re-Unions constantly creating two out of One, its freshly enlivened ghostly-self sincerely seeking understanding of the pure realm from which it was born.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 7, 2013 23:11:21 GMT -5
When 'ONE' experiences 'ONE', 'ONE' seems to become 'TWO'. Between this apparent 'pair', 'Everything' happens. :-)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 7, 2013 23:12:27 GMT -5
When 'ONE' experiences 'ONE', 'ONE' seems to become 'TWO'. Between this apparent 'pair', 'Everything' happens. good one. ego arises out of momentary re-Unions constantly creating two out of One, its freshly enlivened ghostly-self sincerely seeking understanding of the pure realm from which it was born. :-) :-)
|
|
|
Post by silence on Oct 8, 2013 16:21:23 GMT -5
When 'ONE' experiences 'ONE', 'ONE' seems to become 'TWO'. Between this apparent 'pair', 'Everything' happens.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 8, 2013 19:59:43 GMT -5
When 'ONE' experiences 'ONE', 'ONE' seems to become 'TWO'. Between this apparent 'pair', 'Everything' happens. Don't be rude, or people won't play with you ;-)
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on Oct 8, 2013 22:12:19 GMT -5
Don't be rude, or people won't play with you ;-) That was a thinly veiled attack.
|
|
|
Post by tcejer on Oct 9, 2013 11:14:52 GMT -5
When 'ONE' experiences 'ONE', 'ONE' seems to become 'TWO'. Between this apparent 'pair', 'Everything' happens. good one. ego arises out of momentary re-Unions constantly creating two out of One, its freshly enlivened ghostly-self sincerely seeking understanding of the pure realm from which it was born. I'm sorry but I don't get it. Nothing above seems to make sense to me. Can someone please explain?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 9, 2013 12:38:45 GMT -5
good one. ego arises out of momentary re-Unions constantly creating two out of One, its freshly enlivened ghostly-self sincerely seeking understanding of the pure realm from which it was born. :-XX I'm sorry but I don't get it. Nothing above seems to make sense to me. Can someone please explain? The model is that there is the pure being of existence, I call it God, and that in its purest most essential nature, existence, or God, is just an ISNESS with no "knowing" or awareness of self. When existence observes itself, there is a pseudo split between observer and observed that appears, but really it is not a split, its self looking at self, but appears to be a bifurcation of self of observer and observed. In the process of "knowing thyself", the endless appearances and variations of duality appear in the ONE self. Duality is just the process of self observing self in endlessly variable ways, but duality does not actually exist, because its still all one self. One self, looking at self, creates the appearance of a kind of duality of observer and observed.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 9, 2013 12:46:55 GMT -5
Can look at it in another way too, in that there is a tri-union of what appears to be three phenomena...observer, observing, and observed.
You can even say that observer and observed are really the same in that they are a pseudo "thing", while observing is an "action" or "doing".
But really, its all one self.....either the self is in the action of "knowing thyself" (observing), or its still, simply BEING, without the action of observing or "knowing thyself".
Either way...all still SELF, or......GOD
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 9, 2013 16:54:55 GMT -5
Can look at it in another way too, in that there is a tri-union of what appears to be three phenomena...observer, observing, and observed. You can even say that observer and observed are really the same in that they are a pseudo "thing", while observing is an "action" or "doing". But really, its all one self.....either the self is in the action of "knowing thyself" (observing), or its still, simply BEING, without the action of observing or "knowing thyself". Either way...all still SELF, or......GOD Didn't you write all this last night?
spiritualteachers.proboards.com/post/155189
|
|
|
Post by relinquish on Oct 9, 2013 18:29:05 GMT -5
good one. ego arises out of momentary re-Unions constantly creating two out of One, its freshly enlivened ghostly-self sincerely seeking understanding of the pure realm from which it was born. I'm sorry but I don't get it. Nothing above seems to make sense to me. Can someone please explain? Sure. What I refer to in my OP as 'ONE' is 'This Which Actually IS', which as far as I can see, must be fundamentally boundless and causeless, or iow, infinite and eternal. 'It' can have no real ultimate boundary, in expanse or duration. The presence of such a boundary is a fundamental impossibility, as beyond it would necessarily exist an unencompassed 'state' of 'Non-Existence'. The very presence of such a state would ensure that its own forever necessary criteria of 'absolute absence' could never be truely met, and so, is a state of absolute incoherence, as such remaining eternally 'self-cancelled' as the fundamental contradiction that it is. Non-Existence does not exist, anywhere, ever. Therefore, This Which Actually IS, remaining as it does forever unencompassed and devoid of any actual limitation, is not a 'thing'. But it IS 'ONE'. My OP attempts to explain why there seems to be an 'Everything' or 'Universe' in spite of the fundamental impossibility of actual 'things', and also inspite of the actual existence of 'ONE' alone.
|
|
|
Post by ???????? ???????????? on Oct 9, 2013 19:05:29 GMT -5
Another solution is that we live in a world that is of a negative charge. So that if you take away all things then you get a void, but this void will effectively be a higher energy state than with all the things.
And this means that there doesn't even have to be a reason or effort for this negatively charged world to arise, simply because it costs absolutely nothing. It would be a "less than nothing" world that can arise spontaneously and for which the way of least resistance is not toward the void but instead toward more and more things and complexity.
|
|
|
Post by acewall on Oct 9, 2013 19:20:27 GMT -5
good one. ego arises out of momentary re-Unions constantly creating two out of One, its freshly enlivened ghostly-self sincerely seeking understanding of the pure realm from which it was born. I'm sorry but I don't get it. Nothing above seems to make sense to me. Can someone please explain? YES! right-on, "I" never gets it as it is IT; how can One know its Origin? All that we can-have is a ghostly-self; something rises-up out of the united-whole a something that wishes to know, that has the capacity to desire, that goes about uniting thinker an thought and having small or large flashes of light about our heads, where we arise to work things out. Steves God is what religions are fabricated from. The world is full of them. Know thy self.
|
|
|
Post by relinquish on Oct 9, 2013 20:46:17 GMT -5
Another solution is that we live in a world that is of a negative charge. So that if you take away all things then you get a void, but this void will effectively be a higher energy state than with all the things. And this means that there doesn't even have to be a reason or effort for this negatively charged world to arise, simply because it costs absolutely nothing. It would be a "less than nothing" world that can arise spontaneously and for which the way of least resistance is not toward the void but instead toward more and more things and complexity. Yeah. I think this is entirely compatible with what I'm saying.
|
|