|
Post by silver on Aug 16, 2013 0:30:00 GMT -5
Guess not. Chalk up another E team member who doesn't like answering questions. So much for sincerity. That's the problemo here. Assuming alliances and such. ...not like they're obvious or anything...
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Aug 16, 2013 0:46:39 GMT -5
Yes, I guess I make a good test subject for your mental water polo games, what with surveying the mental landscape, and all that. You make a good example for how we create and maintain our illusions and defend them against all intruders.
|
|
|
Post by silver on Aug 16, 2013 1:02:52 GMT -5
Yes, I guess I make a good test subject for your mental water polo games, what with surveying the mental landscape, and all that. You make a good example for how we create and maintain our illusions and defend them against all intruders. Seems like you're the one doing that.
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Aug 16, 2013 1:50:34 GMT -5
You make a good example for how we create and maintain our illusions and defend them against all intruders. Seems like you're the one doing that. I'm sure it does.
|
|
|
Post by topology on Aug 16, 2013 6:55:54 GMT -5
That's the problemo here. Assuming alliances and such. ...not like they're obvious or anything... The interpretation that there are alliances skews the evidence to support having the interpretation. You are not yet aware of when you are succumbing to confirmation bias.
|
|
|
Post by Beingist on Aug 16, 2013 7:07:14 GMT -5
Yes, I guess I make a good test subject for your mental water polo games, what with surveying the mental landscape, and all that. Would there be anything wrong with that? Nope. Don't let me spoil your psychoanalytical fun. (But if I end up in Psychology Today, I'd like some of the proceeds, thanks)
|
|
|
Post by Beingist on Aug 16, 2013 7:08:37 GMT -5
Yes, I guess I make a good test subject for your mental water polo games, what with surveying the mental landscape, and all that. You make a good example for how we create and maintain our illusions and defend them against all intruders. If mine is an example, yours is the epitome.
|
|
|
Post by Beingist on Aug 16, 2013 7:14:39 GMT -5
Guess not. Chalk up another E team member who doesn't like answering questions. So much for sincerity. That's the problemo here. Assuming alliances and such. That's actually just a dig. I'm aware that there's no 'club'. But, it's sure easy (and kinda fun) lumping you all in together, when you all behave so similarly.
|
|
|
Post by Beingist on Aug 16, 2013 7:16:55 GMT -5
...not like they're obvious or anything... The interpretation that there are alliances skews the evidence to support having the interpretation. You are not yet aware of when you are succumbing to confirmation bias. Who's the 'you' here, top?
|
|
|
Post by topology on Aug 16, 2013 7:22:47 GMT -5
The interpretation that there are alliances skews the evidence to support having the interpretation. You are not yet aware of when you are succumbing to confirmation bias. Who's the 'you' here, top? The person I was replying to.
|
|
|
Post by Beingist on Aug 16, 2013 7:28:33 GMT -5
Who's the 'you' here, top? The person I was replying to. Okey dokey. By the way, thanks for answering my question.
|
|
|
Post by topology on Aug 16, 2013 7:56:45 GMT -5
The person I was replying to. Are they a personless person? This person has a death grip on their personhood. The first instance of "person" is reefering to a localized pattern of thoughts. The second instance of person(hood) is reefering to the content of the thoughts about being a person.
|
|
|
Post by topology on Aug 16, 2013 7:59:27 GMT -5
The person I was replying to. Okey dokey. By the way, thanks for answering my question. Soitenly
|
|
|
Post by topology on Aug 16, 2013 8:33:55 GMT -5
This person has a death grip on their personhood. The first instance of "person" is reefering to a localized pattern of thoughts. The second instance of person(hood) is reefering to the content of the thoughts about being a person. It wasn't a real question. I know.
|
|
|
Post by topology on Aug 16, 2013 9:39:55 GMT -5
I know. Nice effort, though. It was your 2,500th Effort at what?
|
|