Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 27, 2013 21:47:44 GMT -5
What reasoning? I just asked a question, nothing more. For some reason he's injecting the words "reasoning" and "perceptions" into just about every post he makes. TRF is not doing anything...even though injecting of the words "reasoning' and "perceptions" happens... And neither are you when you type "For some reason he's injecting the words "reasoning" and "perceptions" into just about every post he makes"... It's the reasoning that the attention is glued to that's doing all the talking...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 27, 2013 21:54:41 GMT -5
I'f i was Shawn i'd herd all us funny buggars into a room for seven days..... an film us@it.
Us@it would be a world hit.
|
|
|
Post by hybrid on Jul 27, 2013 22:44:07 GMT -5
We aren't doers... So whatever happens whether painful, orgasmic, happy, sad, or joking is what's happening... we aren't doing it... We are not the doing of the world, we are the perceiving of the doing of the world... Our attention is trapped in the doing of a doer and we rarely escape from that... are you saying there are two things in the universe? one , a background passive awareness and two all the contents that is happening in it? that this back ground awareness is totally separated with its contents? im afraid its a little bit complicated than that. the feeling or experience that its all happening to me is just one aspect of subjective experience. the interpretation that this is an absolute meraphysical reality is just an interpretation derived from that experience
|
|
|
Post by silence on Jul 28, 2013 0:38:41 GMT -5
For some reason he's injecting the words "reasoning" and "perceptions" into just about every post he makes. TRF is not doing anything...even though injecting of the words "reasoning' and "perceptions" happens... And neither are you when you type "For some reason he's injecting the words "reasoning" and "perceptions" into just about every post he makes"... It's the reasoning that the attention is glued to that's doing all the talking... I thought this was an English speaking forum?
|
|
|
Post by hybrid on Jul 28, 2013 1:53:17 GMT -5
it's the reasoning that the attention is glued to that's doing all the talking... I thought this was an English speaking forum? my best guess is its a nondual language. i think i can translate that to english
|
|
|
Post by ???????? ???????????? on Jul 28, 2013 10:08:03 GMT -5
It was a honest to God question. So is it possible to find out what the numbers will be? ANYTHING is possible, although the probability of a particular event may be extremely remote. You're cheating because yours is an intellectual answer based on belief/principle. But I also admit that my question wasn't precise enough. So let me rephrase: What is next week's winning number for the biggest lottery jackpot in the US?Remember, this is an existential question and the only valid answer consists of a specific number and not a probabilistic function.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 28, 2013 10:39:09 GMT -5
ANYTHING is possible, although the probability of a particular event may be extremely remote. You're cheating because yours is an intellectual answer based on belief/principle. But I also admit that my question wasn't precise enough. So let me rephrase: What is are next week's winning numbers for the biggest lottery jackpot in the US?Remember, this is an existential question and the only valid answer consists of a specific number and not a probabilistic function. 3, 8, 16, 21, 43, 56
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 28, 2013 10:43:27 GMT -5
We aren't doers... So whatever happens whether painful, orgasmic, happy, sad, or joking is what's happening... we aren't doing it... We are not the doing of the world, we are the perceiving of the doing of the world... Our attention is trapped in the doing of a doer and we rarely escape from that... are you saying there are two things in the universe? one , a background passive awareness and two all the contents that is happening in it? that this back ground awareness is totally separated with its contents? im afraid its a little bit complicated than that. the feeling or experience that its all happening to me is just one aspect of subjective experience. the interpretation that this is an absolute meraphysical reality is just an interpretation derived from that experience Awareness or the perceiver and the perceived are not two things... No separation is ever experienced... It is the attention on reason that says there is a me and there is something called the world which is not me... But there aren't two things there, perceiver and perceived are of the same substance...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 28, 2013 10:47:17 GMT -5
TRF is not doing anything...even though injecting of the words "reasoning' and "perceptions" happens... And neither are you when you type "For some reason he's injecting the words "reasoning" and "perceptions" into just about every post he makes"... It's the reasoning that the attention is glued to that's doing all the talking... I thought this was an English speaking forum? When the attention is on reason there's no end to the silly thoughts...
|
|
|
Post by silence on Jul 28, 2013 10:48:58 GMT -5
I thought this was an English speaking forum? my best guess is its a nondual language. i think i can translate that to english Thanks, that would be great.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 28, 2013 10:50:33 GMT -5
I thought this was an English speaking forum? my best guess is its a nondual language. i think i can translate that to english Thinking we are doers of translating non-dual language into English is very reasonable...
|
|
|
Post by ???????? ???????????? on Jul 28, 2013 14:48:56 GMT -5
You're cheating because yours is an intellectual answer based on belief/principle. But I also admit that my question wasn't precise enough. So let me rephrase: What is are next week's winning numbers for the biggest lottery jackpot in the US?Remember, this is an existential question and the only valid answer consists of a specific number and not a probabilistic function. 3, 8, 16, 21, 43, 56Alright, now let's see if Bobby's method is indeed as spectacular as he wants us to believe. I assume we're talking about the Powerball lottery. Next drawing is on July 31st.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 28, 2013 14:53:37 GMT -5
Alright, now let's see if Bobby's method is indeed as spectacular as he wants us to believe. I assume we're talking about the Powerball lottery. Next drawing is on July 31st. I didn't know that that lottery existed until now.
|
|
|
Post by ???????? ???????????? on Jul 28, 2013 15:04:45 GMT -5
Alright, now let's see if Bobby's method is indeed as spectacular as he wants us to believe. I assume we're talking about the Powerball lottery. Next drawing is on July 31st. I didn't know that that lottery existed until now.I googled it. Could be wrong. Which one did you have in mind?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 28, 2013 15:11:45 GMT -5
I didn't know that that lottery existed until now. I googled it. Could be wrong. Which one did you have in mind? I see now that it was on the page I looked at, though I was happy with the mega link www.lotteryusa.com/
|
|