Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 7, 2013 13:25:29 GMT -5
It doesn't look like it will fit around his big head. It depends on which head you're talking about. I think you guys have corrupted me. I'm pointing at the one fastened to his neck. It should have been clear who's corrupting who with your 'rock on' comment.
|
|
|
Post by topology on Aug 7, 2013 13:48:15 GMT -5
It doesn't look like it will fit around his big head. It depends on which head you're talking about. I think you guys have corrupted me. I think Verbed just let slip that Laughy has been attending those Chopra fudge packing parties with him.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 7, 2013 13:56:38 GMT -5
It depends on which head you're talking about. I think you guys have corrupted me. I think Verbed just let slip that Laughy has been attending those Chopra fudge packing parties with him. You're bs-ing yourself, again. The reference was always about the big head housing his puny brain.
|
|
|
Post by topology on Aug 7, 2013 14:05:36 GMT -5
I think Verbed just let slip that Laughy has been attending those Chopra fudge packing parties with him. You're bs-ing yourself, again. The reference was always about the big head housing his puny brain. *basks in Verbed's loving embrace*
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 7, 2013 14:43:26 GMT -5
You're bs-ing yourself, again. The reference was always about the big head housing his puny brain. *basks in Verbed's loving embrace* What's the deal with your sexual immaturity, Top? You read like your still in junior high.
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Aug 7, 2013 14:47:41 GMT -5
It depends on which head you're talking about. I think you guys have corrupted me. I'm pointing at the one fastened to his neck. It should have been clear who's corrupting who with your 'rock on' comment. I've still got a halo around my head (the one on my shoulders) with the 'rock on' comment, and I dunno where you're goin with it. It's just your usual geological humor.
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Aug 7, 2013 14:49:51 GMT -5
It depends on which head you're talking about. I think you guys have corrupted me. I think Verbed just let slip that Laughy has been attending those Chopra fudge packing parties with him. Are they dinner parties? ***Eyeing Top suspiciously***
|
|
|
Post by topology on Aug 7, 2013 14:51:18 GMT -5
*basks in Verbed's loving embrace* What's the deal with your sexual immaturity, Top? You read like your still in junior high. *hugs Verbed closer* So Loving!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 7, 2013 14:53:25 GMT -5
I'm pointing at the one fastened to his neck. It should have been clear who's corrupting who with your 'rock on' comment. I've still got a halo around my head (the one on my shoulders) with the 'rock on' comment, and I dunno where you're goin with it. It's just your usual geological humor. I just responded to a post where you claimed utter fascination, which has nothing to do with halos. You're really not very consistent.
|
|
|
Post by topology on Aug 7, 2013 14:54:27 GMT -5
I think Verbed just let slip that Laughy has been attending those Chopra fudge packing parties with him. Are they dinner parties? ***Eyeing Top suspiciously*** I think they make brownies which Chopra blesses before they are taken to homeless shelters. Such Love is packed into those fudge filled morsels.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 7, 2013 14:58:11 GMT -5
What's the deal with your sexual immaturity, Top? You read like your still in junior high. *hugs Verbed closer* So Loving! Yeah, sure, avoid it. You've gotta be close to thirty, if not more. Do you see it as some kinda ultra liberated state?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 7, 2013 15:00:20 GMT -5
Are they dinner parties? ***Eyeing Top suspiciously*** I think they make brownies which Chopra blesses before they are taken to homeless shelters. Such Love is packed into those fudge filled morsels. I'm quite sure your dinner parties are beneath most sages dignity, and most likely the rest of the planet's population, too.
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Aug 7, 2013 15:07:54 GMT -5
I've still got a halo around my head (the one on my shoulders) with the 'rock on' comment, and I dunno where you're goin with it. It's just your usual geological humor. I just responded to a post where you claimed utter fascination, which has nothing to do with halos. You're really not very consistent. Honestly, the mind world you live in is pretty foreign to me, and I don't understand most of your posts. Human nature interests me, and so odd behaviors interest me. I don't think it has anything to do with either halos or pitchforks, at least not in my world.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 7, 2013 15:18:17 GMT -5
I just responded to a post where you claimed utter fascination, which has nothing to do with halos. You're really not very consistent. Honestly, the mind world you live in is pretty foreign to me, and I don't understand most of your posts. Human nature interests me, and so odd behaviors interest me. I don't think it has anything to do with either halos or pitchforks, at least not in my world. Human nature does not interest you. You have a lot of odd behaviors. Do you comment on why you talk out of both sides of your mouth? No. Why you rearrange things so you can see others as unconscious? Of course not. You know why? The world you live in is on the internet.
|
|
|
Post by tzujanli on Aug 7, 2013 16:31:22 GMT -5
Greetings.. On one hand, you keep calling for this open honest discussion, but on the other you've shut down our conversation on what you mean, exactly, by the word "belief" -- a word that you use quite a bit. Here is a direct challenge to you in the spirit of your stated desire for an open honest discussion: where, in that conversation, have I been disrespectful to you? Did you miss the fact that my initial pointing-up of your mental map was simply repeating back to you your own words? Your reaction was anything but. In contrast to that, I've been quite patient in conversing with you about the details of your definition: 1 , 2, 3. Greetings.. Hi Bill.. good on ya.. You've got the general awareness of how it works, even if you try to provoke by implying a misquote while preserving plausible deniability.. you're such a clever boy.. Again, you misrepresent my position.. of course i want to talk about reality and existence, openly, honestly, directly.. but no, i'm not interested in entertaining wannabe psychoanalysts.. you and other oneness believers, have this notion that you are qualified to judge and manipulate what others' "mental map" should be.. my suggestion remains, that it is they, the unique individuals, that have the ability and opportunity to explore, through their own clarity, and adapt to what is actually happening, apart from the intentions of others that they should believe what those others say they should believe.. are you not clear on this, Bill?.. when you or anyone else approaches the discussion with the intention of having someone believe what 'you' believe, the discussion stalls and diminishes into conflict, but.. when there is open and honest intention to explore what is actually happening, the discussions are fluid and dynamic, those discussions, and the mindscapes from which they are conceived, are fertile opportunities for expanded awareness and growth.. Be well.. Mindscape isn't even a real word, fluid and dynamic discussions require respect and it's quite clear from your contributions here that what you mean by "awareness and growth" is a bigger and more intricate map -- which is, of course, in direct opposition to your "still mind clarity" dogma. "Wannabe psychoanalysts" and "oneness believers" and the phantom intention of coercing belief on the part of a set of correspondents are products of your fertile imagination. A simple reply of yes or no or further clarification in the OHD on your definition of belief will suffice. As it is, your reply is too muddled to contribute to that exploration. You might try de-coupling your emotional reactions about the ideas under discussion from the ideas under discussion. <heavy sigh>.. You do not come empty to the discussion, Bill.. you arrive agenda in hand, more than one agenda.. you promote your beliefs and you seek revenge.. so no, i'm not interested in OHD where none is intended by the 'person' pretending to either be a non-person or a pretend non-person pretending to be a person.. do you get this, Bill? yes or no? it's that simple, yes or no.. or, as you are so fond of doing, will you spin another illusion? Be well..
|
|