|
Post by klaus on Jul 3, 2011 14:14:21 GMT -5
the non-conceptual world is meaningless!
meaningless:
.
|
|
|
Post by heretic on Jul 3, 2011 14:24:33 GMT -5
What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well.
|
|
|
Post by therealfake on Jul 3, 2011 14:34:39 GMT -5
the non-conceptual world is meaningless! meaningless: Of course it is... How else is the mind/ego going to keep your eyes glued to the illusion, you know, keep the delusion going?... That's it's job, make that which is real, the illusion and make that which is delusional, real... If you are the Ego/mind, the non conceptual/creator is meaningless and don't you forget it...lol
|
|
|
Post by klaus on Jul 3, 2011 15:32:12 GMT -5
What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well. when a chicken lays an egg it does not know a chicken will come out.
|
|
|
Post by klaus on Jul 3, 2011 15:35:21 GMT -5
the non-conceptual world is meaningless! meaningless: Of course it is... How else is the mind/ego going to keep your eyes glued to the illusion, you know, keep the delusion going?... That's it's job, make that which is real, the illusion and make that which is delusional, real... If you are the Ego/mind, the non conceptual/creator is meaningless and don't you forget it...lol illusion and delusion are of the mind. you're going around in circles...the circle is also the mind.
|
|
|
Post by heretic on Jul 3, 2011 15:53:20 GMT -5
What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well. when a chicken lays an egg it does not know a chicken will come out. Assumption? Startling Scientists, Plant Fixes Its Flawed Gene ...In a startling discovery, geneticists at Purdue University say they have found plants that possess a corrected version of a defective gene inherited from both their parents, as if some handy backup copy with the right version had been made in the grandparents' generation or earlier. The finding implies that some organisms may contain a cryptic backup copy of their genome that bypasses the usual mechanisms of heredity...Equally surprising, the cryptic gene appears not to be made of DNA, the standard hereditary material. -Nicholas Wade, New York Times, March 23, 2005 awareness, Being, and love?
|
|
|
Post by klaus on Jul 3, 2011 17:51:39 GMT -5
assumption?
to the chicken that study is totally meaningless.
|
|
|
Post by heretic on Jul 3, 2011 18:21:05 GMT -5
How can it be an assumption when it's followed by a question mark?
Hmmm... to the chicken that study is totally meaningless. Well, maybe, if the chicken is a regular poster or reader here, then, that could be true. But, what if that chicken is of the same consciousness as the plant in the study? Now we're back to the question of which came first- the chicken, or the egg. We could include the plant, or the sap to the equation, too.
This one's been bugging me for awhile. Whom does a male ladybug dance with?
|
|
|
Post by therealfake on Jul 3, 2011 18:44:29 GMT -5
It's like Old McDonald's farm 'round here...heh Enigma believes he knows what it's like to 'be' a cat... And now Klaus knowing what it's like to 'be' a chicken... Maybe we should start from the beginning... Finding out what it means to 'be' Old McDonald...
|
|
|
Post by heretic on Jul 3, 2011 19:05:20 GMT -5
TRF You have this remarkable gift of putting a smile on my face. Doesn't matter to me what the chickens do or do not think. I am in solidarity with all chickens! Viva el pollo! love
|
|
|
Post by dreamerkat on Jul 3, 2011 19:09:52 GMT -5
I know what it is like to *eat* chicken . . .
But I hardly know what it is like to be me.
|
|
|
Post by heretic on Jul 3, 2011 19:38:10 GMT -5
:: bowing ::
|
|
|
Post by therealfake on Jul 3, 2011 20:16:27 GMT -5
I know what it is like to *eat* chicken . . . But I hardly know what it is like to be me. If you practice silence, thoughtlessness, you will 'see' what it is to be me, I mean you, I mean God, I mean the spirit, I mean the creator... Ahh, shucks, just practice it and you'll remember who/what you are, and then that chicken will taste even better... ::Bows:: to Heretic's Bowing... Nameste
|
|
|
Post by heretic on Jul 3, 2011 20:19:44 GMT -5
nameste, brother.
|
|
|
Post by klaus on Jul 3, 2011 21:04:30 GMT -5
How can it be an assumption when it's followed by a question mark? Hmmm... to the chicken that study is totally meaningless. Well, maybe, if the chicken is a regular poster or reader here, then, that could be true. But, what if that chicken is of the same consciousness as the plant in the study? Now we're back to the question of which came first- the chicken, or the egg. We could include the plant, or the sap to the equation, too. This one's been bugging me for awhile. Whom does a male ladybug dance with? i was questioning the assumption in your post. the chicken is the only one who has ever posted on this forum. whom does a male lady bug dance with? who ever asks.
|
|