|
bubbles
Jun 14, 2013 21:13:46 GMT -5
Post by silence on Jun 14, 2013 21:13:46 GMT -5
Studied History, dude. Got some degrees, even. Uh oh, Mr.Bigshot coming through!
|
|
|
bubbles
Jun 14, 2013 21:26:38 GMT -5
Post by Beingist on Jun 14, 2013 21:26:38 GMT -5
Studied History, dude. Got some degrees, even. Uh oh, Mr.Bigshot coming through! Hey, that even kinda looks like me! (Or, at least with a tie, and without glasses). Pretty good.
|
|
|
bubbles
Jun 14, 2013 22:04:44 GMT -5
Post by laughter on Jun 14, 2013 22:04:44 GMT -5
Authority/Elite requires consent of the ruled. Sometimes that consent is willfully given, but most of the time unconsciously. I don't know what the 'experience' you refer to is, but it's unlikely to have sealed the movement of history, which contains many examples counter to your experience. Studied History, dude. Got some degrees, even. Mark Twain said, "History does not repeat itself, but it does rhyme." There's some rhyming going on with this whole chemical weapon usage thing. I can easily remember Colin Powell speaking to the U.N. about Iraq's 'weapons of mass destruction', and arguing how they should be removed. Guess what they actually found there. Same thing here. A highly repetitive tact for warmakers throughout the ages is the pretext. This chemical weapon thing is just another pretext. You'll see. And if there's something you can do to prevent it, by all means, have at it. You have my full support. The drink they sank the Maine in weren't the Gulf of Tonkin!
|
|
|
bubbles
Jun 14, 2013 22:20:30 GMT -5
Post by Beingist on Jun 14, 2013 22:20:30 GMT -5
Studied History, dude. Got some degrees, even. Mark Twain said, "History does not repeat itself, but it does rhyme." There's some rhyming going on with this whole chemical weapon usage thing. I can easily remember Colin Powell speaking to the U.N. about Iraq's 'weapons of mass destruction', and arguing how they should be removed. Guess what they actually found there. Same thing here. A highly repetitive tact for warmakers throughout the ages is the pretext. This chemical weapon thing is just another pretext. You'll see. And if there's something you can do to prevent it, by all means, have at it. You have my full support. The drink they sank the Maine in weren't the Gulf of Tonkin! And, neither was Pearl Harbor.
|
|
|
bubbles
Jun 15, 2013 3:56:35 GMT -5
Post by andrew on Jun 15, 2013 3:56:35 GMT -5
This is what I was thinking as well. Bear in mind, that doing anything in Syria also serves as a nice distraction from getting the whistle blown on them for tapping everyone's phones and internet. In the end, there's nothing any of us can do, that's for sure. The Elite will do whatever the Elite want to do.That's where the LOA axioms may come in useful. That's probably a discussion for another thread though.
|
|
|
bubbles
Jun 15, 2013 9:03:34 GMT -5
Post by Reefs on Jun 15, 2013 9:03:34 GMT -5
This is what I was thinking as well. Bear in mind, that doing anything in Syria also serves as a nice distraction from getting the whistle blown on them for tapping everyone's phones and internet. In the end, there's nothing any of us can do, that's for sure. The Elite will do whatever the Elite want to do. Just BE, remember? 'The Elite' is a concept, a story about 'what is'. It shouldn't be of any concern to a true Beingist, doncha think?
|
|
|
bubbles
Jun 15, 2013 9:13:23 GMT -5
Post by Beingist on Jun 15, 2013 9:13:23 GMT -5
Bear in mind, that doing anything in Syria also serves as a nice distraction from getting the whistle blown on them for tapping everyone's phones and internet. In the end, there's nothing any of us can do, that's for sure. The Elite will do whatever the Elite want to do. Just BE, remember? 'The Elite' is a concept, a story about 'what is'. It shouldn't be of any concern to a true Beingist, doncha think? Not exactly. The President of the United States isn't a 'story'; the Council on Foreign Relations isn't a 'story'; the U.S. Federal Reserve Board and the European Central Bank aren't 'stories'; the Annual Bilderberg meetings aren't 'stories'. These are real entities that play a major role in global events. What they do isn't a 'story', either, but just what happens in the world. I am allowing what they do, what happens in the world. I've put a lot of those events together to explain, if only to myself, what is happening. That is all.
|
|
|
bubbles
Jun 15, 2013 9:36:58 GMT -5
Post by Reefs on Jun 15, 2013 9:36:58 GMT -5
Just BE, remember? 'The Elite' is a concept, a story about 'what is'. It shouldn't be of any concern to a true Beingist, doncha think? Not exactly. The President of the United States isn't a 'story'; the Council on Foreign Relations isn't a 'story'; the U.S. Federal Reserve Board and the European Central Bank aren't 'stories'; the Annual Bilderberg meetings aren't 'stories'. These are real entities that play a major role in global events. What they do isn't a 'story', either, but just what happens in the world. I am allowing what they do, what happens in the world. I've put a lot of those events together to explain, if only to myself, what is happening. That is all. The 'entity' is imagination. If you go to the CFR or the Bilder boys you will probably see a bunch of chairs, tables, coffee cups and some individuals having conversations. Similar to Tzu's 'bad boys borg gang' that is 'posting manipulative crepe'. That gang is imagination, a story about what is. What comes closest to 'what is happening' is that A disagrees with Tzu, B disagrees with Tzu, C agrees with Tzu, E disagrees with Tzu. That's all. Tzu puts A,B and E into a concept called 'gang' and declares it 'what is'. However, the 'gang' is not 'what is'. The 'gang' is a concept, a story about 'what is'.
|
|
|
bubbles
Jun 15, 2013 9:50:31 GMT -5
Post by Beingist on Jun 15, 2013 9:50:31 GMT -5
Not exactly. The President of the United States isn't a 'story'; the Council on Foreign Relations isn't a 'story'; the U.S. Federal Reserve Board and the European Central Bank aren't 'stories'; the Annual Bilderberg meetings aren't 'stories'. These are real entities that play a major role in global events. What they do isn't a 'story', either, but just what happens in the world. I am allowing what they do, what happens in the world. I've put a lot of those events together to explain, if only to myself, what is happening. That is all. The 'entity' is imagination. If you go to the CFR or the Bilder boys you will probably see a bunch of chairs, tables, coffee cups and some individuals having conversations. Similar to Tzu's 'bad boys borg gang' that is 'posting manipulative crepe'. That gang is imagination, a story about what is. What comes closest to 'what is happening' is that A disagrees with Tzu, B disagrees with Tzu, C agrees with Tzu, E disagrees with Tzu. That's all. Tzu puts A,B and E into a concept called 'gang' and declares it 'what is'. However, the 'gang' is not 'what is'. The 'gang' is a concept, a story about 'what is'. You used the term, 'gang', not me. I never said anything about any gangs. I'm only talking about what is happening. If a group of individuals get together to discuss what they can or need to do in order to accomplish a certain objective, I wouldn't call that a 'gang'. I'd call it a group of individuals getting together to discuss what they can or need to do in order to accomplish a certain objective. That's all that's happening with these entities, and their agendas are all quite similar, though never identical (which casts doubt upon the 'gang' theory that you suggest I'm adopting as a 'story').
|
|
|
bubbles
Jun 15, 2013 9:54:14 GMT -5
Post by Reefs on Jun 15, 2013 9:54:14 GMT -5
The 'entity' is imagination. If you go to the CFR or the Bilder boys you will probably see a bunch of chairs, tables, coffee cups and some individuals having conversations. Similar to Tzu's 'bad boys borg gang' that is 'posting manipulative crepe'. That gang is imagination, a story about what is. What comes closest to 'what is happening' is that A disagrees with Tzu, B disagrees with Tzu, C agrees with Tzu, E disagrees with Tzu. That's all. Tzu puts A,B and E into a concept called 'gang' and declares it 'what is'. However, the 'gang' is not 'what is'. The 'gang' is a concept, a story about 'what is'. You used the term, 'gang', not me. I never said anything about any gangs. I'm only talking about what is happening. If a group of individuals get together to discuss what they can or need to do in order to accomplish a certain objective, I wouldn't call that a 'gang'. I'd call it a group of individuals getting together to discuss what they can or need to do in order to accomplish a certain objective. That's all that's happening with these entities, and their agendas are all quite similar, though never identical (which casts doubt upon the 'gang' theory that you suggest I'm adopting as a 'story'). Forget the gang thing. That was just the Tzu equivalent to your story. A group is a concept. If you add an objective to that group then you have a story. Ever tried to hug a group? You can't. All you can do is hug individuals.
|
|
|
bubbles
Jun 15, 2013 9:55:15 GMT -5
Post by tzujanli on Jun 15, 2013 9:55:15 GMT -5
Greeting.. Not exactly. The President of the United States isn't a 'story'; the Council on Foreign Relations isn't a 'story'; the U.S. Federal Reserve Board and the European Central Bank aren't 'stories'; the Annual Bilderberg meetings aren't 'stories'. These are real entities that play a major role in global events. What they do isn't a 'story', either, but just what happens in the world. I am allowing what they do, what happens in the world. I've put a lot of those events together to explain, if only to myself, what is happening. That is all. The 'entity' is imagination. If you go to the CFR or the Bilder boys you will probably see a bunch of chairs, tables, coffee cups and some individuals having conversations. Similar to Tzu's 'bad boys borg gang' that is 'posting manipulative crepe'. That gang is imagination, a story about what is. What comes closest to 'what is happening' is that A disagrees with Tzu, B disagrees with Tzu, C agrees with Tzu, E disagrees with Tzu. That's all. Tzu puts A,B and E into a concept called 'gang' and declares it 'what is'. However, the 'gang' is not 'what is'. The 'gang' is a concept, a story about 'what is'. The function of ABCE is consistent with the functions of gang mentality, ABCE apply the same gang tactics to others who disagree with them.. it's not just 'Tzu'.. 'gang' is used to illustrate that the tactics of the aligned group, ABCE, are consistent with spiritual violence.. provocation, intimidation, mocking, sarcasm, etc.. Be well..
|
|
|
bubbles
Jun 15, 2013 9:59:01 GMT -5
Post by Reefs on Jun 15, 2013 9:59:01 GMT -5
Greeting.. The 'entity' is imagination. If you go to the CFR or the Bilder boys you will probably see a bunch of chairs, tables, coffee cups and some individuals having conversations. Similar to Tzu's 'bad boys borg gang' that is 'posting manipulative crepe'. That gang is imagination, a story about what is. What comes closest to 'what is happening' is that A disagrees with Tzu, B disagrees with Tzu, C agrees with Tzu, E disagrees with Tzu. That's all. Tzu puts A,B and E into a concept called 'gang' and declares it 'what is'. However, the 'gang' is not 'what is'. The 'gang' is a concept, a story about 'what is'. The function of ABCE is consistent with the functions of gang mentality, ABCE apply the same gang tactics to others who disagree with them.. it's not just 'Tzu'.. 'gang' is used to illustrate that the tactics of the aligned group, ABCE, are consistent with spiritual violence.. provocation, intimidation, mocking, sarcasm, etc.. Be well.. "spiritual violence", "provocation", "intimidation", "mocking", "sarcasm" are all stories about what is happenign already. What do these all have in common? They show up as words on screen. One and the same words will then be turned into different concepts by different readers/individuals/vantage points.
|
|
|
bubbles
Jun 15, 2013 10:02:20 GMT -5
Post by Beingist on Jun 15, 2013 10:02:20 GMT -5
You used the term, 'gang', not me. I never said anything about any gangs. I'm only talking about what is happening. If a group of individuals get together to discuss what they can or need to do in order to accomplish a certain objective, I wouldn't call that a 'gang'. I'd call it a group of individuals getting together to discuss what they can or need to do in order to accomplish a certain objective. That's all that's happening with these entities, and their agendas are all quite similar, though never identical (which casts doubt upon the 'gang' theory that you suggest I'm adopting as a 'story'). Forget the gang thing. That was just the Tzu equivalent to your story. A group is a concept. If you add an objective to that group then you have a story. Ever tried to hug a group? You can't. All you can do is hug individuals. I see. Not a team player. Remind me not to hire you, should the opportunity ever arise.
|
|
|
bubbles
Jun 15, 2013 10:05:47 GMT -5
Post by laughter on Jun 15, 2013 10:05:47 GMT -5
Not exactly. The President of the United States isn't a 'story'; the Council on Foreign Relations isn't a 'story'; the U.S. Federal Reserve Board and the European Central Bank aren't 'stories'; the Annual Bilderberg meetings aren't 'stories'. These are real entities that play a major role in global events. What they do isn't a 'story', either, but just what happens in the world. I am allowing what they do, what happens in the world. I've put a lot of those events together to explain, if only to myself, what is happening. That is all. The 'entity' is imagination. If you go to the CFR or the Bilder boys you will probably see a bunch of chairs, tables, coffee cups and some individuals having conversations. Similar to Tzu's 'bad boys borg gang' that is 'posting manipulative crepe'. That gang is imagination, a story about what is. What comes closest to 'what is happening' is that A disagrees with Tzu, B disagrees with Tzu, C agrees with Tzu, E disagrees with Tzu. That's all. Tzu puts A,B and E into a concept called 'gang' and declares it 'what is'. However, the 'gang' is not 'what is'. The 'gang' is a concept, a story about 'what is'. Well, strictly speaking, they are stories yes. They just happen to be stories that can be pretty interesting from the perspective of anticipating an impact to one's experience. Anticipation might be anathema to just being, but it's sometimes a practical necessity. For example, you can be d@mn sure that I checked the TSA website for the latest shifting cattle requirements before all the post 911 flights I've taken. It's also useful to keep an eye on potential global conflict if you have an interest in the markets that hedge currency, such as metals like gold.
|
|
|
bubbles
Jun 15, 2013 10:11:20 GMT -5
Post by Beingist on Jun 15, 2013 10:11:20 GMT -5
The 'entity' is imagination. If you go to the CFR or the Bilder boys you will probably see a bunch of chairs, tables, coffee cups and some individuals having conversations. Similar to Tzu's 'bad boys borg gang' that is 'posting manipulative crepe'. That gang is imagination, a story about what is. What comes closest to 'what is happening' is that A disagrees with Tzu, B disagrees with Tzu, C agrees with Tzu, E disagrees with Tzu. That's all. Tzu puts A,B and E into a concept called 'gang' and declares it 'what is'. However, the 'gang' is not 'what is'. The 'gang' is a concept, a story about 'what is'. Well, strictly speaking, they are stories yes. They just happen to be stories that can be pretty interesting from the perspective of anticipating an impact to one's experience. Anticipation might be anathema to just being, but it's sometimes a practical necessity. For example, you can be d@mn sure that I checked the TSA website for the latest shifting cattle requirements before all the post 911 flights I've taken. It's also useful to keep an eye on potential global conflict if you have an interest in the markets that hedge currency, such as metals like gold.... or other commodities, or equities, or bonds, etc. Indeed, a highly significant point.
|
|