|
|
Post by Peter on Feb 3, 2017 7:50:51 GMT -5
Well that seems apropos of nothing since you weren't involved in the sub-thread. Of course I don't know how much Laughter was either, but he's not being offensive. Did you reply to the wrong post or are you just taking a pop at Laughter for the sake of it? Oh supporting Laughter just for a change? I don't understand why you allow him inside when everyday you have to talk to him about what's offensive and what's not! I feel like you are enjoying here, Did I understand you wrong? Are you advocating the sudden permaban approach to moderating here Gopal? Reefs wanted me to work that way also. No chances, no discussion, just anyone who's not playing nicely gets booted off? I don't feel like I'm getting much enjoying here, if that answers your question about understanding. |
|
|
|
Post by Peter on Feb 3, 2017 6:41:04 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Peter on Feb 3, 2017 6:38:00 GMT -5
For someone to keep repeating over and over that you're manipulative is an eyebrow raiser of a strategy, that much is fer sure.  If there's any mystery to what I mean, well, obviously the repetition is a form of manipulation in and of itself. You mean nothing to me so you don't count. Well that seems apropos of nothing since you weren't involved in the sub-thread. Of course I don't know how much Laughter was either, but he's not being offensive. Did you reply to the wrong post or are you just taking a pop at Laughter for the sake of it? |
|
|
|
Post by Peter on Feb 3, 2017 6:30:46 GMT -5
Krsnaraja, are you going to copy out an entire book? That's quite a waste of space you know. If you just provide a single post with a link to it, then people can follow that and read the thing themselves should they have an interest in it.
I don't see any discussion going on here.
|
|
|
|
Post by Peter on Jan 30, 2017 8:38:13 GMT -5
See now, this is of course reason for me to revisit my suspicion:  So it seems that you're playing the same literalistic game as in your answer about Shakespeare. I never wrote "go away you are a stalker" to alfio, I just posted a few pictures of Alex Forest. And also, please notice that in this instance you very specifically expressed the opinion that I found your taxi joke to be hurtful. But what did I write that would lead you to that conclusion at that particular point in the dialog? You see, alfy's stalking was simply a fact at the time, but that I felt injured either by the stalking or some of the insulting things he wrote just because I recognized them as expressing the intent to insult is a concoction of imagination. Stalker. Peter will give me protection just once he said. I said nothing of the sort. Look, I'm okay with ignoring these games as long as they don't start to exceed the amount of on-topic dialog because I can see you're having fun with it. Just don't pull me in to it or think I'm going to play. I haven't got the time. P |
|
|
|
Post by Peter on Jan 26, 2017 16:25:16 GMT -5
Yeah, man, my blood was really pumping I can tell you  I do find myself admiring your equanimity, Peter. Nice to see you again.  Thanks Hashi. You know this re-engagement with Gopal has reminded me that I like Spiritual connection. It's my thing. I just feel like I haven't got a lot to say about it. I've maybe been a bit too focused on my work and home life and forgetting that I have this wider context that I'm also part of. |
|
|
|
Post by Peter on Jan 26, 2017 16:08:29 GMT -5
What makes you think I allow it? Because I say to you that you shouldn't react to it? This is my problem, getting over to you that two things can happen at the same time. Alfio shouldn't do it, you shouldn't react to it. Both things! Two! If I'm not mistaken, that's the first time I've ever seen you use an exclamation mark. Yeah, man, my blood was really pumping I can tell you |
|
|
|
Post by Peter on Jan 26, 2017 9:46:14 GMT -5
wow Peter! As long as you are here, All the abusive people can freely roam around this forum and abuse anybody they want. When you know somebody is being abusive, why are asking me not to react? why don't you ban the people? You asked me to show you a post in which Alfio shows philosophical interest and isn't mocking people. I did so! But you're not interested, because it's not in line with this fixed view you have. Which makes you a very hard person to please, you know? I'm asking you to not be so reactive because Alfio is not the first or the last person who's going to wind you up. On this forum or in your life. And frankly while you're such an easy target, you're going to keep attracting it. At no point did I say that posting abusive posts was OK and at no point did I say I wasn't going to ban Alfio. |
|
|
|
Post by Peter on Jan 26, 2017 9:34:23 GMT -5
dude, when you know someone is being abusive, why are you asking me not to react? Why don't you simply ban him permanently? Why can't I do both? |
|
|
|
Post by Peter on Jan 26, 2017 9:29:45 GMT -5
Dude show me a single post of Alfio which shows any philosophical interest? Or show me a single post which doesn't have mocking towards another people? I Know your ears will never hear what I am saying to you, but still I am struggling with you. you see! Well we're both struggling. Just look back through his posting history. It's not all about you, you know. Here's an example: spiritualteachers.proboards.com/post/396159/thread |
|
|
|
Post by Peter on Jan 26, 2017 9:13:30 GMT -5
I don't want a moderator who allow abusiveness for personality development of others Peter, Please make Enigma Or Laffy as a moderator ! Kindly do that please. Hey people hear from me, You could abuse people for their self-improvement or personality development, Peter would allow you to do that. What makes you think I allow it? Because I say to you that you shouldn't react to it? This is my problem, getting over to you that two things can happen at the same time. Alfio shouldn't do it, you shouldn't react to it. Both things! Two! |
|
|
|
Post by Peter on Jan 26, 2017 9:09:29 GMT -5
Make Laffy or Enigma as a Moderator, Once you make Laffy or Enigma as a moderator, then I will not even come on your side! I will not even talk to you afterwords. Or Make Enigma as a Moderator who reads all the post, I believe atleast he can understand the situation to some extent. Well we already discussed that Laughter tried the position and it didn't work out. Enigma has never shown any interest in the job, but he could apply for sure. P |
|
|
|
Post by Peter on Jan 26, 2017 9:05:12 GMT -5
So you allow abusive comment for other people personality development? You try to force me into a box Gopal, where you only allow me one opinion: "This poster is in the right, this other poster is in the wrong. " You've never grasped that I might have something to say to the first, and something completely different to say to the other. One has an opportunity to learn, the other has an opportunity to not post here for a month. It's becoming big irritation to argue with you than arguing with alfio. I can imagine. I wonder why you keep creating this reality. It's almost like you're trying to point something out to yourself.... |
|
|
|
Post by Peter on Jan 26, 2017 8:55:07 GMT -5
Now tell me how are you feeling now when I say abusive words as for your personal development. I'm feeling fine Gopal. I just point out the fact of your ad-hominem attack and move on. It's all grist for the mill you know, fuel for the crucible. Peter I want to tell something, Please don't get me wrong. If I can't do a particular work, then I will give that work to a person who is capable of doing it. Am I correct with my words? Find someone else by all means Gopal. I don't feel that I can stop doing it until someone else takes over. Many have tried, all have given up or been sacked. Or in the case of our first moderator, disappeared without trace. I'm sorry to say I think he died. |
|
|
|
Post by Peter on Jan 26, 2017 8:39:12 GMT -5
He had two strands, one was in the tough love mold (ie for your ultimate benefit), and the other was the "I'm providing a public service by forcing Gopal to show his true nature". It took a little while to work through why I found him to be disingenuous, but we got there in the end. This is one of the most nonsense paragraph I have ever read in 2017. I don't know that you are that poor in understanding. Why do you say that? To say "this is nonsense, you are poor in understanding" without saying what the correct understanding should be is an ad-hominem attack that is of no use to anyone. Well, except perhaps the amusement of bystanders. I am in no way saying that it's not abusive. But it's also an opportunity for your personal development. A gift! So as a moderator you would allow abusive for the benefit of others? Can I also do the same for the benefit of others? Gopal, you're already doing so! See above. |
|
If there's any mystery to what I mean, well, obviously the repetition is a form of manipulation in and of itself.
