Post by enigma on Apr 3, 2010 13:11:04 GMT -5
I posted this elsewhere yesterday, and thought maybe it would be useful fodder here.:
So, he says, "I've been practicing meditation for 30 years, and I'm telling you it works!" I said, since your goal is Truth realization, and this hasn't happened after 30 years, I'd say it's an unmitigated failure.
This guy in a Tolle forum has been practicing 'stilling his mind' for 25 years. I said, 'Since the mind that is trying to be still is the same mind that is trying to not be still, what sort of a game are you playing with yourself?'
Lately, I've been chatting with a guy who declares endlessly that nothing can be known. I keep asking him how he can know that.....
Practices have a practical value. They can demonstrate something in the context of our experience that we can't understand conceptually, but all practices are ultimately to be transcended or they fail to serve their teaching purpose, and the practice itself becomes the goal, and more often than not, an effective means of insuring failure and the continuation of delusion.
In meditation designed for Truth realization, the goal is not to perfect meditation but to realize Truth. The goal of the practice of stilling the mind is not to perfect a process but to stop chasing thoughts around in the first place so that it's not necessary to stop doing that. The practice of Neti-Neti (not this, not that) is not to perpetually and habitually deny that anything is true, but to notice that all thoughts are inventions of mind and need not be attached to, which ends the practice of looking for thoughts that are true. The purpose of a forgiveness practice is to notice judgments and the negative impact they have on ourselves and others, and that they are not ultimately true, thereby letting go of judgment so that a forgiveness practice is not necessary.
Marie and I were in the park the other day and she asked "So how do we let go?" I said that letting go cannot be a practice, because there is no separation between the one holding on and the one letting go. To imagine that there is, is to split the mind and create an internal conflict that insures failure. I picked up a stone and held it in my closed fist, palm down, and I said, if it's my intention to let go of the stone, what sort of practice is required? How long will it take for me to perfect the practice of letting go of the stone? If there is any space at all between my intention to let go, and the letting go, then the intention is not to let go, and if it is not, how is a practice going to change my intention?
I was talking to a friend today about how practices that do seem to serve their purpose are very often not let go of because there's the idea that 'it took me this far, so it should continue to work', even though the usefulness of the practice has exhausted itself. I said it's like saying, 'this camel has taken me through the desert and brought me to the ocean..... Now if I can only teach my camel to swim.'
So, he says, "I've been practicing meditation for 30 years, and I'm telling you it works!" I said, since your goal is Truth realization, and this hasn't happened after 30 years, I'd say it's an unmitigated failure.
This guy in a Tolle forum has been practicing 'stilling his mind' for 25 years. I said, 'Since the mind that is trying to be still is the same mind that is trying to not be still, what sort of a game are you playing with yourself?'
Lately, I've been chatting with a guy who declares endlessly that nothing can be known. I keep asking him how he can know that.....
Practices have a practical value. They can demonstrate something in the context of our experience that we can't understand conceptually, but all practices are ultimately to be transcended or they fail to serve their teaching purpose, and the practice itself becomes the goal, and more often than not, an effective means of insuring failure and the continuation of delusion.
In meditation designed for Truth realization, the goal is not to perfect meditation but to realize Truth. The goal of the practice of stilling the mind is not to perfect a process but to stop chasing thoughts around in the first place so that it's not necessary to stop doing that. The practice of Neti-Neti (not this, not that) is not to perpetually and habitually deny that anything is true, but to notice that all thoughts are inventions of mind and need not be attached to, which ends the practice of looking for thoughts that are true. The purpose of a forgiveness practice is to notice judgments and the negative impact they have on ourselves and others, and that they are not ultimately true, thereby letting go of judgment so that a forgiveness practice is not necessary.
Marie and I were in the park the other day and she asked "So how do we let go?" I said that letting go cannot be a practice, because there is no separation between the one holding on and the one letting go. To imagine that there is, is to split the mind and create an internal conflict that insures failure. I picked up a stone and held it in my closed fist, palm down, and I said, if it's my intention to let go of the stone, what sort of practice is required? How long will it take for me to perfect the practice of letting go of the stone? If there is any space at all between my intention to let go, and the letting go, then the intention is not to let go, and if it is not, how is a practice going to change my intention?
I was talking to a friend today about how practices that do seem to serve their purpose are very often not let go of because there's the idea that 'it took me this far, so it should continue to work', even though the usefulness of the practice has exhausted itself. I said it's like saying, 'this camel has taken me through the desert and brought me to the ocean..... Now if I can only teach my camel to swim.'