Post by Reefs on Aug 24, 2023 6:28:28 GMT -5
There’s always a lot of talk about spiritual experiences, mystical experiences etc. and entire belief systems have been built around those. People classify them, catalog them, compare them, develop maps and progress charts and grade both students and teachers based on those maps. And while it is certainly true that basically all sages report of at least one (often several) such ‘peak-experiences’, the point many keep missing is that liberation is not about experiences but realization(s).
In psychology, there is a term called ‘self-actualization’, which basically means becoming a true, autonomous individual and therefore being able to live one’s full potential. It’s a term coined by Maslow. And it is linked to ‘peak-experiences’, another term coined by Maslow, which, at least on the surface, does seem to have some relevance to what we here tend to talk about.
Maslow, in his work, makes a clear distinction between a motivation or perception that is a) centered in being and b) centered in deficiency. And he calls these B-motivation, B-cognition or D-motivation, D-cognition. Now, this basically corresponds to what I tend to call alignment vs. misalignment, i.e. alignment coming from a perspective if being and misalignment coming from perspective of deficiency.
So with Maslow, there seem to be an interesting number of overlaps with what we are usually pointing to, both in the deliberate creation context (practice, purification) as well as in the liberation context (non-doing, presence of mind, peace of mind etc.)
However, despite all the seeming similarities, Maslow’s ‘self-actualization’ should not be confused with ‘self-realization’ the way we use this term. The main reason is that Maslow’s work is mostly concerned with experiences. And understandably so, because he was a psychologist and had to test, qualify, quantify and validate his theories. So a theory that consists purely of pointers, as is the case with non-duality, was not an option for Maslow, even though Maslow had to concede that words and methods fail him when trying to get to the heart of the matter.
This is especially true in the case of what Maslow calls ‘peak-experiences’. Those are exceptional experiences that people will remember for the rest of their lives, which usually also change their lives or at least their outlook on life dramatically, in a very positive way because they feel more integrated, at one with life in the aftermath.
But again, a peak-experience shouldn’t be confused with a realization, and self-actualization shouldn’t be confused with self-realization. The former belongs to the realm of psychology, the latter is far beyond that. So in our context, these peak-experiences are maybe better called peek-experiences.
I am going to quote from one of Maslow’s books, Towards a Psychology of Being, which is actually a collection of essays and a good reference book. IMO, he does an excellent job in describing, analyzing and classifying those extraordinary experiences.
In psychology, there is a term called ‘self-actualization’, which basically means becoming a true, autonomous individual and therefore being able to live one’s full potential. It’s a term coined by Maslow. And it is linked to ‘peak-experiences’, another term coined by Maslow, which, at least on the surface, does seem to have some relevance to what we here tend to talk about.
Maslow, in his work, makes a clear distinction between a motivation or perception that is a) centered in being and b) centered in deficiency. And he calls these B-motivation, B-cognition or D-motivation, D-cognition. Now, this basically corresponds to what I tend to call alignment vs. misalignment, i.e. alignment coming from a perspective if being and misalignment coming from perspective of deficiency.
So with Maslow, there seem to be an interesting number of overlaps with what we are usually pointing to, both in the deliberate creation context (practice, purification) as well as in the liberation context (non-doing, presence of mind, peace of mind etc.)
However, despite all the seeming similarities, Maslow’s ‘self-actualization’ should not be confused with ‘self-realization’ the way we use this term. The main reason is that Maslow’s work is mostly concerned with experiences. And understandably so, because he was a psychologist and had to test, qualify, quantify and validate his theories. So a theory that consists purely of pointers, as is the case with non-duality, was not an option for Maslow, even though Maslow had to concede that words and methods fail him when trying to get to the heart of the matter.
This is especially true in the case of what Maslow calls ‘peak-experiences’. Those are exceptional experiences that people will remember for the rest of their lives, which usually also change their lives or at least their outlook on life dramatically, in a very positive way because they feel more integrated, at one with life in the aftermath.
But again, a peak-experience shouldn’t be confused with a realization, and self-actualization shouldn’t be confused with self-realization. The former belongs to the realm of psychology, the latter is far beyond that. So in our context, these peak-experiences are maybe better called peek-experiences.
I am going to quote from one of Maslow’s books, Towards a Psychology of Being, which is actually a collection of essays and a good reference book. IMO, he does an excellent job in describing, analyzing and classifying those extraordinary experiences.