|
|
Post by alertpeaceeternal on Feb 7, 2017 17:28:01 GMT -5
What is the underlying assumption that has to be changed to know that you're living in non-separation? Okay. Hmmm. Lots of choices. Maybe one to change is... I have a life "Have" ? |
|
|
|
Post by alertpeaceeternal on Feb 7, 2017 17:29:43 GMT -5
I have an assumption about who you are in real life, Zaz. You better don't mess with me. Peace, bro....m'kay? Consider yourself messed with. Bring it on! I promise not report you. Let's see what you got! Nuttin'...only some fellas wid mobile-phones, looking at me. Peace, bro.  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2017 17:35:48 GMT -5
Consider yourself messed with. Bring it on! I promise not report you. Let's see what you got! Nuttin'...only some fellas wid mobile-phones, looking at me. Peace, bro. Peace out. |
|
|
|
Post by andrew on Feb 7, 2017 17:44:11 GMT -5
Okay. Hmmm. Lots of choices. Maybe one to change is... I have a life "Have" ? Yes, i would say it's a fairly common assumption that life is a kind of temporary property that we gain, and then lose. It means that we experience ourselves as apart from life to an extent. |
|
|
|
Post by alertpeaceeternal on Feb 7, 2017 17:52:07 GMT -5
Yes, i would say it's a fairly common assumption that life is a kind of temporary property that we gain, and then lose. It means that we experience ourselves as apart from life to an extent. Property? Why not embodiement? |
|
|
|
Post by andrew on Feb 7, 2017 18:13:16 GMT -5
Yes, i would say it's a fairly common assumption that life is a kind of temporary property that we gain, and then lose. It means that we experience ourselves as apart from life to an extent. Property? Why not embodiement? Embodiment would be a better assumption, but more often than not life is seen as something we have and then lose. You might even hear people saying, 'this is my life and I am free to do with it what I want ' or something of the sort. |
|
|
|
Post by alertpeaceeternal on Feb 7, 2017 18:22:42 GMT -5
Property? Why not embodiement? Embodiment would be a better assumption, but more often than not life is seen as something we have and then lose. You might even hear people saying, 'this is my life and I am free to do with it what I want ' or something of the sort. Most important rule in my book is: AHIMSA (non-violence). Keep jap shap and follow. Don't rule. Only follow. No barking. Keep yap shap. ...m'kay? |
|
|
|
Post by andrew on Feb 7, 2017 18:35:22 GMT -5
Embodiment would be a better assumption, but more often than not life is seen as something we have and then lose. You might even hear people saying, 'this is my life and I am free to do with it what I want ' or something of the sort. Most important rule in my book is: AHIMSA (non-violence). Keep jap shap and follow. Don't rule. Only follow. No barking. Keep yap shap. ...m'kay? Non violence as a rule or principle is a good un. |
|
|
|
Post by alertpeaceeternal on Feb 7, 2017 18:39:13 GMT -5
Most important rule in my book is: AHIMSA (non-violence). Keep jap shap and follow. Don't rule. Only follow. No barking. Keep yap shap. ...m'kay? Non violence as a rule or principle is a good un. |
|
|
|
Post by andrew on Feb 7, 2017 18:56:46 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by alertpeaceeternal on Feb 7, 2017 18:58:00 GMT -5
I know what "un" means.
What do you want?
|
|
|
|
Post by andrew on Feb 7, 2017 18:59:18 GMT -5
I know what "un" means. What do you want? Why the question mark and highlighted word? |
|
|
|
Post by alertpeaceeternal on Feb 7, 2017 19:01:02 GMT -5
Because the sentense you wrote wasn't clear in its meaning.
What do you want?
|
|
|
|
Post by andrew on Feb 7, 2017 19:01:56 GMT -5
Because the sentense you wrote wasn't clear in its meaning. What do you want? What wasn't clear? When? |
|
|
|
Post by alertpeaceeternal on Feb 7, 2017 19:04:25 GMT -5
What do you want?
|
|
