Pictures Only (Talk)

[lolly]

[laughter]

Mar 31, 2015 20:53:04 GMT -5 lolly said:

<** creepy crag face dude pic **>

So he's usin' the lollipop 'cause he's tryin' to quit smokin'??

[laughter]

Mar 31, 2015 20:01:07 GMT -5 @popee said:

ok, how far down the rabbduck hole does this go ?

[laughter]

Peeps shouldn't post yt vids if the language isn't English.

[zin]

Apr 1, 2015 3:53:31 GMT -5 laughter said:

Peeps shouldn't post yt vids if the language isn't English.

I am understanding but pretending not to!

[laughter]

Apr 3, 2015 1:15:26 GMT -5 jay17 said:

Uhm-hmmmm .... "Why don't you STFU?" is an obvious double bind and this is the same picture from your personalized mocking thread.

Now, go back there to that thread and count your words, count my words. Which one of us brought less silence there?

[jay17]

Apr 3, 2015 4:07:02 GMT -5 laughter said:

Apr 3, 2015 1:15:26 GMT -5 jay17 said:

Uhm-hmmmm .... "Why don't you STFU?" is an obvious double bind

1. "Why don't you STFU?"..seems reasonable to speculate you are quoting someone, please link to the original.
2. In response to the bolded text...(apologises for the low quality, only spend a few seconds searching)

[jay17]

Apr 3, 2015 4:07:02 GMT -5 laughter said:

Apr 3, 2015 1:15:26 GMT -5 jay17 said:

...and this is the same picture from your personalized mocking thread.

There is always a possibility of being held responsible for the pain a person feels when you point out their error, weakness or flaw\dysfunction. I for one do not have any desire to add to another's woes by doing such a thing.
But i always remember the first step in problem solving..."Acknowledge the problem". Thus there is no way around it.
If i want to help another solve a problem, the first thing to do is to help them see that a problem exists.
My choice is to express this as gently as possible, and with no intentional devaluing condemnation towards them.

laughter, it seems to me you have a sight\perception glitch, for you are completely mistaken.
The picture you have posted here is definiately not the same as the one in my "is that latin?" thread.

Also related to your possible sight\perception glitch...my thread you linked to is not called "personalized mocking"
...it's called, "is that latin?" It is written clearly for anyone to see.

[laughter]

Apr 3, 2015 6:44:01 GMT -5 jay17 said:

Apr 3, 2015 4:07:02 GMT -5 laughter said:

Uhm-hmmmm .... "Why don't you STFU?" is an obvious double bind

1. "Why don't you STFU?"..seems reasonable to speculate you are quoting someone, please link to the original.
2. In response to the bolded text...(apologises for the low quality, only spend a few seconds searching)

Sorry not bothering with your vid ... "if you STFU then you might understand something" just replaces the question with a supposition. As the question is more honest I stated it that way to give you the benefit of the doubt.

[laughter]

Apr 3, 2015 9:56:53 GMT -5 jay17 said:

Apr 3, 2015 4:07:02 GMT -5 laughter said:

...and this is the same picture from your personalized mocking thread.

There is always a possibility of being held responsible for the pain a person feels when you point out their error, weakness or flaw\dysfunction. I for one do not have any desire to add to another's woes by doing such a thing.
But i always remember the first step in problem solving..."Acknowledge the problem". Thus there is no way around it.
If i want to help another solve a problem, the first thing to do is to help them see that a problem exists.
My choice is to express this as gently as possible, and with no intentional devaluing condemnation towards them.

laughter, it seems to me you have a sight\perception glitch, for you are completely mistaken.
The picture you have posted here is definiately not the same as the one in my "is that latin?" thread.

Also related to your possible sight\perception glitch...my thread you linked to is not called "personalized mocking"
...it's called, "is that latin?" It is written clearly for anyone to see.

The only difference is of the cropping and the words, it's of the same scene.

Your problem seems to run a little deeper than just perception.

[jay17]

Apr 3, 2015 9:57:50 GMT -5 laughter said:

Sorry not bothering with your vid

Another indication of why i choose to not engage in lengthy discussions with you at this time laughter. I interpret your action as an expression you have no interest in listening to what i say in our dialogue.

Apr 3, 2015 9:57:50 GMT -5 laughter said:

"if you STFU then you might understand something" just replaces the question with a supposition.

Thanks for this technical info, irrelevant that it is. I asked who you are quoting and to provide a link to it, because it is not clear to me what is the connection between that quote and the 'quote pic' i posted in the pic thread...hence the clear and simple inquiry to find out.

And in case you wish to point your finger at me again...no, to me, the current discussions i am having with you do not fit within the category of "lengthy or indepth."

However, if you are unable or unwilling to answer my query- request of who are you quoting and prove a link to it..i will opt out of this convo. I have learnt to cease interacting with people who struggle with such a simple interaction vehicle as answering questions...especially since i usually ask a lot of them within a convo because i enjoy learning about others and their thoughts.

Though as i communicate with you, even on one simple issue, it becomes more apparent to me how you manage to clutter up so many threads with off topic issues(the majority of them complaining and\or criticizing) 

[jay17]

Apr 3, 2015 9:59:21 GMT -5 laughter said:

and this is the same picture from your personalized mocking thread.

The only difference is of the cropping and the words, it's of the same scene.

Then by your own admission, it is not the same picture. Can't be the same picture if there are differences.
I fully agree with you, it's the same scene, but your original claim was not, "same scene", you clearly stated "same picture."
Please, you can have the last word.

[laughter]

Apr 3, 2015 11:45:33 GMT -5 jay17 said:

Apr 3, 2015 9:59:21 GMT -5 laughter said:

and this is the same picture from your personalized mocking thread.

The only difference is of the cropping and the words, it's of the same scene.

Then by your own admission, it is not the same picture. Can't be the same picture if there are differences.
I fully agree with you, it's the same scene, but your original claim was not, "same scene", you clearly stated "same picture."
Please, you can have the last word.

That's just silly literalism.

[laughter]

Apr 3, 2015 11:31:41 GMT -5 jay17 said:

Apr 3, 2015 9:57:50 GMT -5 laughter said:

Sorry not bothering with your vid

Another indication of why i choose to not engage in lengthy discussions with you at this time laughter. I interpret your action as an expression you have no interest in listening to what i say in our dialogue.

As most of what you write is snide and combative the lack of interest in engagement between us goes both ways, but you keep replying and weaving my name into your content, so here we are JG.

Apr 3, 2015 11:31:41 GMT -5 jay17 said:

Apr 3, 2015 9:57:50 GMT -5 laughter said:

"if you STFU then you might understand something" just replaces the question with a supposition.

Thanks for this technical info, irrelevant that it is. I asked who you are quoting and to provide a link to it, because it is not clear to me what is the connection between that quote and the 'quote pic' i posted in the pic thread...hence the clear and simple inquiry to find out.

And in case you wish to point your finger at me again...no, to me, the current discussions i am having with you do not fit within the category of "lengthy or indepth."

However, if you are unable or unwilling to answer my query- request of who are you quoting and prove a link to it..i will opt out of this convo. I have learnt to cease interacting with people who struggle with such a simple interaction vehicle as answering questions...especially since i usually ask a lot of them within a convo because i enjoy learning about others and their thoughts.

Though as i communicate with you, even on one simple issue, it becomes more apparent to me how you manage to clutter up so many threads with off topic issues(the majority of them complaining and\or criticizing) 

You're projecting there. For instance, you've cluttered up "pictures only" with many many words, and you keep inviting conflict in this thread by your constant stream of insults.

I simply have no inhibitions about responding to this noise, which is more or less a bad habit/lack of discipline on my part which is perhaps a bit inconsiderate of the rest of the forum membership.

[Deleted]

Her Royal Highness Princess Charlotte of Cambridge






wow.. that's quite the identity package.. right off the bat