|
Post by tzujanli on Mar 13, 2013 11:09:40 GMT -5
Greetings.. Greetings.. If people want to play, i can play.. i'm not particularly fond of playing, unless that's stipulated by agreement, so.. when people unilaterally assume it's time to play, i get to choose the rules.. Reefs is a caustic little ( ) that brings chaos and ill-will to the table, so he gets a game suited to his temperament.. When people demonstrate the capacity for sincere discussion, i am eager to oblige.. It's a fairly simple relationship.. Be well.. You state a wise warrior's creed for sure there Tzu'. Your arsenal is impressive, your tactical skills quite snappy, your mastery of the art of strategy quite advanced ... and I say that only partly by way of bustin' yer chops for a laugh. On the other hand, a lack of sincerity in a discussion is a vicious, recursive endless-loop that we can see projected and splashed all around us in what, applying certain standards of values, we might describe as massive social dysfunction. To be clear, I have of course just flashed a snapshot of a whole head of stampeding giraffes. What I seem to imagine in Reefs is someone who goes out on a limb to "test the perimeter" of another's defenses so to speak, essentially just to see if they're there or not, and I'm sure I'm not illuminating anything for you. His sense of humor will grow on you though ... like digger-the-dermatiphyte ... just ask Silver! There is the potential for you to reply in innocence here, and either state that "no I haven't stated a definition of attachment" or to re-state it or link to it. Everyone in Rome thought Hannibal was a nut-job when they heard the route he had taken ... I've explained the process too many times to say more than this. Be well..
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Mar 14, 2013 19:11:36 GMT -5
Greetings.. If only you could abide by your own advice.. Be well.. You can put comments like these in your PM, too. BTW, I'm still waiting for a definition of the word "attachment" from you. Or did I miss that somewhere? Dear Mr. Reefs: Greetings.. Nonsense. If a cat wrote what Tzu wrote, I would know the cat saw enemies. LOL.. Either stop gaming the forum, or give yourself more credit than that.. your statement creates the illusion, i hope it's an illusion, that you are attached to your pride of self-image, believing you can 'know' what you cannot.. No, you really don't 'know', what Tzu or a cat saw.. there is only one 'enemy', it is expectation, also referred to as 'attachment'.. Be well.. -- with continued assurance that all is indeed still well
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on Mar 14, 2013 21:30:44 GMT -5
Greetings.. If people want to play, i can play.. i'm not particularly fond of playing, unless that's stipulated by agreement, so.. when people unilaterally assume it's time to play, i get to choose the rules.. Reefs is a caustic little ( ) that brings chaos and ill-will to the table, so he gets a game suited to his temperament.. When people demonstrate the capacity for sincere discussion, i am eager to oblige.. It's a fairly simple relationship.. Be well.. You state a wise warrior's creed for sure there Tzu'. Your arsenal is impressive, your tactical skills quite snappy, your mastery of the art of strategy quite advanced ... and I say that only partly by way of bustin' yer chops for a laugh. On the other hand, a lack of sincerity in a discussion is a vicious, recursive endless-loop that we can see projected and splashed all around us in what, applying certain standards of values, we might describe as massive social dysfunction. To be clear, I have of course just flashed a snapshot of a whole head of stampeding giraffes. What I seem to imagine in Reefs is someone who goes out on a limb to "test the perimeter" of another's defenses so to speak, essentially just to see if they're there or not, and I'm sure I'm not illuminating anything for you. His sense of humor will grow on you though ... like digger-the-dermatiphyte ... just ask Silver! There is the potential for you to reply in innocence here, and either state that "no I haven't stated a definition of attachment" or to re-state it or link to it. Everyone in Rome thought Hannibal was a nut-job when they heard the route he had taken ... Andrew played exactly the same game. And - oh irony - it was about the exact same word: attachment! Andrew and Tzu had the same initial reactions: 1) claiming that the definition has been already given somewhere 2) I should look it up if I'm interested, they won't bother giving it again 3) when asked for a link, they can't provide the link 4) assuming ill intentions However, after a lot of maneuvering, Andrew had at least the decency to think it over again and post a definition later.
|
|
|
Post by Beingist on Mar 14, 2013 21:43:59 GMT -5
Rolling On Floor Laughing
|
|
|
Post by tzujanli on Mar 14, 2013 21:48:37 GMT -5
You state a wise warrior's creed for sure there Tzu'. Your arsenal is impressive, your tactical skills quite snappy, your mastery of the art of strategy quite advanced ... and I say that only partly by way of bustin' yer chops for a laugh. On the other hand, a lack of sincerity in a discussion is a vicious, recursive endless-loop that we can see projected and splashed all around us in what, applying certain standards of values, we might describe as massive social dysfunction. To be clear, I have of course just flashed a snapshot of a whole head of stampeding giraffes. What I seem to imagine in Reefs is someone who goes out on a limb to "test the perimeter" of another's defenses so to speak, essentially just to see if they're there or not, and I'm sure I'm not illuminating anything for you. His sense of humor will grow on you though ... like digger-the-dermatiphyte ... just ask Silver! There is the potential for you to reply in innocence here, and either state that "no I haven't stated a definition of attachment" or to re-state it or link to it. Everyone in Rome thought Hannibal was a nut-job when they heard the route he had taken ... Andrew played exactly the same game. And - oh irony - it was about the exact same word: attachment! Andrew and Tzu had the same initial reactions: 1) claiming that the definition has been already given somewhere 2) I should look it up if I'm interested, they won't bother giving it again 3) when asked for a link, they can't provide the link 4) assuming ill intentions However, after a lot of maneuvering, Andrew had at least the decency to think it over again and post a definition later. More?? okay!! While you're looking for what you've already been given.. why don't you also provide links to this delusional "exactly the same game".. Reefs, you bring nothing to the table except complaints and caustic attitude.. so, back to the dumpster for you.. trust me, what you are looking for is there, you just don't know what you're looking for.. you have expectations of what you think you'll find.. Be well..
|
|
|
Post by silver on Mar 14, 2013 21:52:50 GMT -5
Andrew played exactly the same game. And - oh irony - it was about the exact same word: attachment! Andrew and Tzu had the same initial reactions: 1) claiming that the definition has been already given somewhere 2) I should look it up if I'm interested, they won't bother giving it again 3) when asked for a link, they can't provide the link 4) assuming ill intentions However, after a lot of maneuvering, Andrew had at least the decency to think it over again and post a definition later. More?? okay!! While you're looking for what you've already been given.. why don't you also provide links to this delusional "exactly the same game".. Reefs, you bring nothing to the table except complaints and caustic attitude.. so, back to the dumpster for you.. trust me, what you are looking for is there, you just don't know what you're looking for.. you have expectations of what you think you'll find.. Be well.. True, Tzu............. then there's the poo-flinging - it's hard not to like the new kuhl avy of his, though.
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on Mar 14, 2013 21:55:57 GMT -5
Andrew played exactly the same game. And - oh irony - it was about the exact same word: attachment! Andrew and Tzu had the same initial reactions: 1) claiming that the definition has been already given somewhere 2) I should look it up if I'm interested, they won't bother giving it again 3) when asked for a link, they can't provide the link 4) assuming ill intentions However, after a lot of maneuvering, Andrew had at least the decency to think it over again and post a definition later. More?? okay!! While you're looking for what you've already been given.. why don't you also provide links to this delusional "exactly the same game".. Reefs, you bring nothing to the table except complaints and caustic attitude.. so, back to the dumpster for you.. trust me, what you are looking for is there, you just don't know what you're looking for.. you have expectations of what you think you'll find.. Be well.. You're so cute when you're mad. Link is in the post you've just quoted.
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Mar 14, 2013 22:05:13 GMT -5
Dear Mr. Reefs, Please remove the lovey-specs, the kind and gentle Mr. Tzu' has indeed provided his definition, albeit outside of this particular open and honest discussion: it is expectation, also referred to as 'attachment'.. -- rotflmao
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on Mar 14, 2013 22:14:05 GMT -5
Dear Mr. Reefs, Please remove the lovey-specs, the kind and gentle Mr. Tzu' has indeed provided his definition, albeit outside of this particular open and honest discussion: it is expectation, also referred to as 'attachment'.. -- rotflmao He said it was there before I asked him (about 2-3 weeks ago). So that actually doesn't count according to the rules of his current catchy-fetchy game. In a dialog with ZD he called attachment the 'antithesis of clarity'. So we have 2 definitions now: attachment according to Tzu = antithesis of clarity = expectation. So, a statement like "your attachment to beliefs" would now translate into a) "your antithesis of clarity to beliefs" or b) "your expectations to beliefs". -- rotflmao
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on Mar 14, 2013 22:15:37 GMT -5
Reefs, you bring nothing to the table except complaints and caustic attitude.. so, back to the dumpster for you.. trust me, what you are looking for is there, you just don't know what you're looking for.. you have expectations of what you think you'll find.. Be well.. Now you're just being mean.
|
|
|
Post by tzujanli on Mar 14, 2013 22:16:50 GMT -5
Greetings.. More?? okay!! While you're looking for what you've already been given.. why don't you also provide links to this delusional "exactly the same game".. Reefs, you bring nothing to the table except complaints and caustic attitude.. so, back to the dumpster for you.. trust me, what you are looking for is there, you just don't know what you're looking for.. you have expectations of what you think you'll find.. Be well.. You're so cute when you're mad. Link is in the post you've just quoted. Mad? at you? lol, nope, you are waaay too entertaining to be 'mad' at.. all bowed-up thinking you're 'all that', banging away at your keyboard and dumpster-divin'.. oh hell no, i'm nowhere close to 'mad'.. Let's talk about your anger issues, though.. you bring nothing but provocation and angry intimidation to the forum, poking at people, most likely because you have no awareness of the real issues being discussed, so like a good troll, you're everywhere.. stirring-up chaos where you can, trying to appear like you understand what going on.. Oh, i'm sorry, did you find something in the dumpster.. no, stop chasing your tail and actually 'look'.. i'm not Andrew, if you can't find it, then you simply can't find it.. not my problem, not even interested, really.. but you seem so.. what's the word?? Be well..
|
|
|
Post by tzujanli on Mar 14, 2013 22:20:00 GMT -5
Greetings.. Reefs, you bring nothing to the table except complaints and caustic attitude.. so, back to the dumpster for you.. trust me, what you are looking for is there, you just don't know what you're looking for.. you have expectations of what you think you'll find.. Be well.. Now you're just being mean. Mean? no.. not by comparison to you.. Be well..
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Mar 14, 2013 22:22:06 GMT -5
In a dialog with ZD he called attachment the 'antithesis of clarity'. Dear Mr. Reefs, In the spirit of the current OHD, a link would seem apropo! -- with cometlike regards
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on Mar 14, 2013 22:38:58 GMT -5
In a dialog with ZD he called attachment the 'antithesis of clarity'. Dear Mr. Reefs, In the spirit of the current OHD, a link would seem apropo! -- with cometlike regards I already gave the link here.
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on Mar 14, 2013 22:39:50 GMT -5
Greetings.. You're so cute when you're mad. Link is in the post you've just quoted. Mad? at you? lol, nope, you are waaay too entertaining to be 'mad' at.. all bowed-up thinking you're 'all that', banging away at your keyboard and dumpster-divin'.. oh hell no, i'm nowhere close to 'mad'.. Let's talk about your anger issues, though.. you bring nothing but provocation and angry intimidation to the forum, poking at people, most likely because you have no awareness of the real issues being discussed, so like a good troll, you're everywhere.. stirring-up chaos where you can, trying to appear like you understand what going on.. Oh, i'm sorry, did you find something in the dumpster.. no, stop chasing your tail and actually 'look'.. i'm not Andrew, if you can't find it, then you simply can't find it.. not my problem, not even interested, really.. but you seem so.. what's the word??Be well.. ESAplus massive cop out
|
|