|
|
Post by andrew on Mar 17, 2013 11:52:13 GMT -5
I really don't mind at all if he does or doesn't. I'd say that's a flat out lie. Its not. If anything, answering his question would require a bit of contemplation and thought, so he is actually making it easier for me by NOT editing. The downside is that I have to deal with this kind of thing. |
|
|
|
Post by silence on Mar 17, 2013 12:19:38 GMT -5
I'd say that's a flat out lie. Its not. If anything, answering his question would require a bit of contemplation and thought, so he is actually making it easier for me by NOT editing. The downside is that I have to deal with this kind of thing. And then the rationalizing. |
|
|
|
Post by andrew on Mar 17, 2013 12:26:25 GMT -5
Its not. If anything, answering his question would require a bit of contemplation and thought, so he is actually making it easier for me by NOT editing. The downside is that I have to deal with this kind of thing. And then the rationalizing. Just saying, you're wrong. The easiest thing for me right now is if sN doesn't edit. There you go sN, even more reason to edit! |
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Mar 17, 2013 13:16:31 GMT -5
I'm just pointing stuff out. The rest is just your believed speculations. You are not pointing out. You only make such an appearance you do. And what M-G says is very much true. Show me where I "state at the very beginning that it's true and others better wise up and fall in line and accept this." Obviously, you can't because I never said that, and yet you feel free to declare it to be very much true and call me wrong. You are claiming what you see are the facts of the situation, and if anyone disagrees with your observations, you then claim they are wrong or blind. You offer no open communication to discover if what you see is true or not. Sound familiar? |
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Mar 17, 2013 13:34:30 GMT -5
Greetings.. The really odd thing is that you think you do. No.. the really odd thing.. is that you play these games without any conscience as to the effects.. your interest is your own amusement.. Be well.. I'm not playing games. What you and some others bring to this forum is a demonstration of precisely how human suffering is created. When we cut through all the speerichule malarky and feel good distractions and get more real than anybody could have hoped for, this is the core reason for suffering. It doesn't matter if you subjectively deny that suffering because it's easy enough for others to relate to that constant stream of negativity and struggle. It doesn't matter that it's not real bad suffering because it's easy enough for others to see how your judgment can very easily become hatred, and then be expressed with physical violence. What does matter is that folks see the truth of the matter beneath your rhetoric, and that's something I can't do much about. |
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Mar 17, 2013 13:39:58 GMT -5
In asking you to edit, I would say I was really asking for the discussion to be a bit more impersonal, and I think you sometimes speak with the intention of being a bit disrespectful, yes. I'm still not going to answer the question you asked until you edit, it would take you approximately 20 seconds to do so which doesn't seem like a big ask to me if you are interested in an answer. That's similar to the OHDM.  Why yes.....yes it is.  |
|
|
|
Post by silence on Mar 17, 2013 13:42:10 GMT -5
And then the rationalizing. Just saying, you're wrong. The easiest thing for me right now is if sN doesn't edit. There you go sN, even more reason to edit! This is kind of tragic. You really don't seem to know what it means to let go. |
|
|
|
Post by andrew on Mar 17, 2013 14:06:51 GMT -5
Just saying, you're wrong. The easiest thing for me right now is if sN doesn't edit. There you go sN, even more reason to edit! This is kind of tragic. You really don't seem to know what it means to let go. You seem to be on a mission here. I'm not gonna say its 'tragic' (coz that would be a bit dramatic), but it seems as if you might benefit from a letting go. |
|
|
|
Post by silence on Mar 17, 2013 14:17:43 GMT -5
This is kind of tragic. You really don't seem to know what it means to let go. You seem to be on a mission here. I'm not gonna say its 'tragic' (coz that would be a bit dramatic), but it seems as if you might benefit from a letting go. Ah, the old Andrew rephrase and redirect strategy. One of the classics. |
|
|
|
Post by andrew on Mar 17, 2013 14:34:38 GMT -5
You seem to be on a mission here. I'm not gonna say its 'tragic' (coz that would be a bit dramatic), but it seems as if you might benefit from a letting go. Ah, the old Andrew rephrase and redirect strategy. One of the classics. Still on that same mission eh Silence? Time to let go perhaps? |
|
|
|
Post by arisha on Mar 17, 2013 14:35:25 GMT -5
You are not pointing out. You only make such an appearance you do. And what M-G says is very much true. Show me where I "state at the very beginning that it's true and others better wise up and fall in line and accept this." Obviously, you can't because I never said that, and yet you feel free to declare it to be very much true and call me wrong. You are claiming what you see are the facts of the situation, and if anyone disagrees with your observations, you then claim they are wrong or blind. You offer no open communication to discover if what you see is true or not. Sound familiar? I don't need to show where you state that this or that is true , because the tone you always speak with never gives any other choices but the one that you are sure what you are saying is true. |
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Mar 17, 2013 15:24:55 GMT -5
Might as well go the whole hog now and meet the whole family...here is one of the kids... Happy kids! ... great shot man |
|
|
|
Post by silver on Mar 17, 2013 15:27:25 GMT -5
Might as well go the whole hog now and meet the whole family...here is one of the kids... Happy kids! ... great shot man Wonderful picture, Andy. I take it the young man in front is your son -what about the little girl in the background? I was waiting for more pictures. |
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Mar 17, 2013 15:32:17 GMT -5
Show me where I "state at the very beginning that it's true and others better wise up and fall in line and accept this." Obviously, you can't because I never said that, and yet you feel free to declare it to be very much true and call me wrong. You are claiming what you see are the facts of the situation, and if anyone disagrees with your observations, you then claim they are wrong or blind. You offer no open communication to discover if what you see is true or not. Sound familiar? I don't need to show where you state that this or that is true , because the tone you always speak with never gives any other choices but the one that what you are saying is true. So it's all about my tone of voice? Shall I tell you what your tone sounds like from here? |
|
|
|
Post by arisha on Mar 17, 2013 15:56:00 GMT -5
I don't need to show where you state that this or that is true , because the tone you always speak with never gives any other choices but the one that what you are saying is true. So it's all about my tone of voice? Shall I tell you what your tone sounds like from here? Just like yours. What else it could be if it simply mirrors yours? |
|
