|
|
Post by Reefs on Feb 13, 2024 10:14:08 GMT -5
Interesting video about nice vs. nasty strategies and how they turn out in a finite and infinite game environment... Successful Qualities: 1. Nice 2. Forgiving 3. Retaliatory 4. Clear Result: What should just be common sense, is now backed up by math as well.  |
|
|
|
Post by inavalan on Feb 13, 2024 16:27:44 GMT -5
Two points against that game theory (at least as discussed in the video): adaptability, intuition. There is a passing mentioning of mutations, that I don't think is about adaptability. Intuition can't be programmed, as it is a mind's feature, but not a brain's.
This video also shows why AI can't become sentient, and why scientists shouldn't be allowed to lead the world. Let both AI and scientists do only what they can do.
An interesting point to ponder on is why some people above average intelligence fail so badly when facing real life problems. I think that it is because they don't know that they don't know. When dealing with perceptions, intelligence is only a specialized tool.
|
|
|
|
Post by lolly on Feb 16, 2024 17:27:10 GMT -5
I can't watch his videos because he sounds like he's talking to little children and the backing track is like a poker machine or something.
|
|
|
|
Post by lolly on Feb 17, 2024 5:19:39 GMT -5
At the moment I'm going with Nietzsche's moral paradigm because I see much 'slave morality' in the woke movement. In his day it was mostly the religious weaponisation of morality originating with the enslavement of Jews in Egypt, but as he said, God died when we killed him, so the slave vs. master paradigm was losing relevance in Western civilisation, but it reemerged in modern race theory and identity politics more generally - you know the drill - and is again the most relevant moral paradigm in the West. Not that anyone is geekin' out on Nietzsche besides me, but you can be thankful that at least my Hegel phase is over.
|
|
