|
Post by tzujanli on Dec 27, 2014 16:44:28 GMT -5
Is that the new club tactic, play the hate card, when it's not even in the deck?.. What makes you think that you deserve anything other than a double bind in reply to a double bind? News flash, the double bind only applies for the one hiding behind it.. the discussion isn't bound to your double bind mantra.. you've danced every possible variation of the double bind in the ownership discussion, and i don't play by your rules.. don't be such a Pu$$y..
|
|
|
Post by silver on Dec 27, 2014 19:00:56 GMT -5
Okay...this is what tzu said: "Yes, the question imbues no facile nature to the observer not looking for that quality.. there was no condescension intended or implied until you introduced it.. I am aware that people try to have productive discussions and they are usually hijacked by a nonduality agenda prevalent among members that have the time and interest to overwhelm those with less time, and those with individualized understandings.. the pattern you describe in Andrew's dialogues are the result of meeting the same agenda/pattern in every interaction with the most aggressively outspoken advocates of nonduality.." Read more: spiritualteachers.proboards.com/thread/3914/real-illusion-spillover?page=50#ixzz3N3shXAaMFor me, I see nothing 'condescending' in that post; therefore, I have no questions about IT, but you are free to diagram it or say what you wish, to explain what it is I'm not getting about what E said in regards to it. I don't have questions about the post. Your problem is your pattern of hijacking the discussion with your aggressively outspoken agenda. ......................
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Dec 27, 2014 22:21:25 GMT -5
What makes you think that you deserve anything other than a double bind in reply to a double bind? News flash, the double bind only applies for the one hiding behind it.. the discussion isn't bound to your double bind mantra.. you've danced every possible variation of the double bind in the ownership discussion, and i don't play by your rules.. don't be such a Pu$$y.. Oh, so all those times you were whining about OHCD you were being a pu$$y?? any time yer man enough to have a discussion without throwing a temper tantrum, I'll be here, and I'll be around even absent that honey.
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Dec 27, 2014 22:23:50 GMT -5
No need, just use your eyes. As you abandoned civility between the two of us in this dialog first you are in no position to comment on a dialog that you're not a party to. Do you have any notion of the outsized spiritual-circus-based ego that you're putting on display by pretending otherwise? I did use my eyes, you provoke that response so you can play this game.. No, i didn't abandon civility, you defined civility to suit your need to escape the discussion.. Wow, what a busy body. Why don't you go give the partyline a rest for an evening. Them curler's been in yer hair way too long dear. Yes, you did abandon civility and yes, you ran from the discussion, it's there for anyone to see. You're incapable of participating here without exploding in malice on a regular basis.
|
|
|
Post by silver on Dec 27, 2014 22:33:06 GMT -5
I did use my eyes, you provoke that response so you can play this game.. No, i didn't abandon civility, you defined civility to suit your need to escape the discussion.. Wow, what a busy body. Why don't you go give the partyline a rest for an evening. Them curler's been in yer hair way too long dear. Yes, you did abandon civility and yes, you ran from the discussion, it's there for anyone to see. You're incapable of participating here without exploding in malice on a regular basis. Advance it to about 1:54
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Dec 27, 2014 22:45:21 GMT -5
Wow, what a busy body. Why don't you go give the partyline a rest for an evening. Them curler's been in yer hair way too long dear. Yes, you did abandon civility and yes, you ran from the discussion, it's there for anyone to see. You're incapable of participating here without exploding in malice on a regular basis. Advance it to about 1:54 Nah, I ain't gonna' bother watching whatever that is ... here, play the whole tune, it's a masterpiece ...
|
|
|
Post by silver on Dec 27, 2014 22:46:22 GMT -5
whatev
|
|
|
Post by tzujanli on Dec 27, 2014 23:12:53 GMT -5
News flash, the double bind only applies for the one hiding behind it.. the discussion isn't bound to your double bind mantra.. you've danced every possible variation of the double bind in the ownership discussion, and i don't play by your rules.. don't be such a Pu$$y.. Oh, so all those times you were whining about OHCD you were being a pu$$y?? any time yer man enough to have a discussion without throwing a temper tantrum, I'll be here, and I'll be around even absent that honey. LOL, did your delicate sensibilities get offended, again.. you are a full-time tantrum, stompin' around looking for a fight, but when you get one you whine.. we can have discussions all day long, but you'll find a way to create diversions and illusions and play word games misrepresenting what is said, and i'm just not up to it, i can't find a level playing field in the illusions you create, you're a gifted 'thinker' and illusionist, you win.. so, i'll post what i post and you'll deal with it or not, i've lost interest in your predicament..
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Dec 27, 2014 23:19:33 GMT -5
Oh, so all those times you were whining about OHCD you were being a pu$$y?? any time yer man enough to have a discussion without throwing a temper tantrum, I'll be here, and I'll be around even absent that honey. LOL, did your delicate sensibilities get offended, again.. you are a full-time tantrum, stompin' around looking for a fight, but when you get one you whine.. we can have discussions all day long, but you'll find a way to create diversions and illusions and play word games misrepresenting what is said, and i'm just not up to it, i can't find a level playing field in the illusions you create, you're a gifted 'thinker' and illusionist, you win.. so, i'll post what i post and you'll deal with it or not, i've lost interest in your predicament.. Look at you in full battle mode now. You're simply unable to conduct yourself as an adult, and with every swing of the sword, you make it more and more clear. Nah, all the whining here is done by you. If you think I feel anything outside of contempt at this point -- much less any sort of sting -- you're just indulging in a self-deceptive fantasy. You whined like a little girl for years about how noone would meet you in open, honest and civil discussion and then when it's offered, you resort to vulgar name calling. The last refuge of an intellectually and philosophically bankrupt, sorry old fool who couldn't debate his way out of a torn fishnet.
|
|
|
Post by tzujanli on Dec 27, 2014 23:29:34 GMT -5
LOL, did your delicate sensibilities get offended, again.. you are a full-time tantrum, stompin' around looking for a fight, but when you get one you whine.. we can have discussions all day long, but you'll find a way to create diversions and illusions and play word games misrepresenting what is said, and i'm just not up to it, i can't find a level playing field in the illusions you create, you're a gifted 'thinker' and illusionist, you win.. so, i'll post what i post and you'll deal with it or not, i've lost interest in your predicament.. Look at you in full battle mode now. You're simply unable to conduct yourself as an adult, and with every swing of the sword, you make it more and more clear. Nah, all the whining here is done by you. If you think I feel anything outside of contempt at this point -- much less any sort of sting -- you're just indulging in a self-deceptive fantasy. You whined like a little girl for years about how noone would meet you in open, honest and civil discussion and then when it's offered, you resort to vulgar name calling. The last refuge of an intellectually and philosophically bankrupt, sorry old fool who couldn't debate his way out of a torn fishnet. Show me some more 'civility', Chuckles, LOL, you never got close to honest in the discussion about volition.... who cares about 'debate winners', when there's a real life to be lived.. you really have misconceived your existence, thinking your witty self-image to be a meaningful substitute for Life without regret..
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Dec 27, 2014 23:35:34 GMT -5
Look at you in full battle mode now. You're simply unable to conduct yourself as an adult, and with every swing of the sword, you make it more and more clear. Nah, all the whining here is done by you. If you think I feel anything outside of contempt at this point -- much less any sort of sting -- you're just indulging in a self-deceptive fantasy. You whined like a little girl for years about how noone would meet you in open, honest and civil discussion and then when it's offered, you resort to vulgar name calling. The last refuge of an intellectually and philosophically bankrupt, sorry old fool who couldn't debate his way out of a torn fishnet. Show me some more 'civility', Chuckles, LOL, you never got close to honest in the discussion about volition.... who cares about 'debate winners', when there's a real life to be lived.. you really have misconceived your existence, thinking your witty self-image to be a meaningful substitute for Life without regret.. anyone can read the dialog and measure the depth of your self-deception, and now you're putting your desperation on display as well ... Do you really think that your wishful thinking is going to have any effect other that deepening the foolishness of the profile you present here?
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Dec 27, 2014 23:43:42 GMT -5
(** rastaphant stares blankly **) So, according to her own logic, she must enjoy tearing down others. Which would correlate with the content and yet despite being very obviously up and out front any idea of any negative feeling state is always vehemently denied. It's insanity.
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Dec 27, 2014 23:47:41 GMT -5
Oh, you can laugh hun', whatever gets ya' through the night ... but those debates are public record ... unlike yer secret diaries. I'd say they don't even exist. That was just a debate tactic and the result of not being able to tell fact from fiction. Yeah the mountain fiasco and the confrontation of the "trap" projections hit an ESA nerve. It was pure defense, but as it couldn't be backed up it was obviously hollow even at the time the claims were made.
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Dec 27, 2014 23:49:53 GMT -5
Whelps, in all cerealness, the captain's crunch on this is that it was totally clear, so if you don't understand something about it then for the life of me it would take either a marshmellow leprechaun or a specific and coherent question about it from you for me to explain it any further. How can we be of assistance? such a charming fellow ... but they gave him a blood sniffer.
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Dec 28, 2014 1:31:29 GMT -5
It doesn't? So, one could be absolutely mired in a thought about the heaviness and darkness of others to the point where it's the predominant thought at the forefront on an ongoing, incessant basis, and that has no bearing on vibration or visa-versa? By "air time" I figure you mean how often it's talked about here, as that has been your reference in the past. As such, no it doesn't.
|
|