|
Post by laughter on Nov 12, 2013 0:43:38 GMT -5
(** crunches and munches on one of an order of "BIG ASS FRYS!!!" **) I have no idea what you're trying to say with this. And I don't want to be guessing. Can you please stop writing to me like that? It's just really really annoying and I feel like you're making fun of me. I think as a mod you just shouldn't be posting stuff like that. At least not in reply to me please. Is that too much to ask?
|
|
|
Senses
Nov 12, 2013 2:13:38 GMT -5
Post by acewall on Nov 12, 2013 2:13:38 GMT -5
I have no idea what you're trying to say with this. And I don't want to be guessing. Can you please stop writing to me like that? It's just really really annoying and I feel like you're making fun of me. I think as a mod you just shouldn't be posting stuff like that. At least not in reply to me please. Is that too much to ask? fabulous liked emensely so anti-touchy-feely makes me wanna go back... intime work as a the-rapist.
|
|
|
Senses
Nov 12, 2013 4:30:23 GMT -5
Post by laughter on Nov 12, 2013 4:30:23 GMT -5
fabulous liked emensely so anti-touchy-feely makes me wanna go back... intime work as a the-rapist. The Time Masheen is at Costcos!
|
|
|
Senses
Nov 12, 2013 7:40:57 GMT -5
Post by ???????? ???????????? on Nov 12, 2013 7:40:57 GMT -5
I have no idea what you're trying to say with this. And I don't want to be guessing. Can you please stop writing to me like that? It's just really really annoying and I feel like you're making fun of me. I think as a mod you just shouldn't be posting stuff like that. At least not in reply to me please. Is that too much to ask? yt vid Apparently it is too much to ask. This forum needs a good mod that people respect. This means that sometimes you have to sacrifice your tendency for obscure jokes and sarcasm. If you don't do that then fewer people will take you seriously. I for one am disappointed in you. I've made a very simple and clear request (and not for the first time). Nothing to misunderstand about it. And then you reply in this way? I just don't get it.
|
|
|
Senses
Nov 12, 2013 8:17:32 GMT -5
Post by acewall on Nov 12, 2013 8:17:32 GMT -5
Apparently it is too much to ask. This forum needs a good mod that people respect. This means that sometimes you have to sacrifice your tendency for obscure jokes and sarcasm. If you don't do that then fewer people will take you seriously. I for one am disappointed in you. I've made a very simple and clear request (and not for the first time). Nothing to misunderstand about it. And then you reply in this way? I just don't get it. You putting yourself-up again fudge-packer?
|
|
|
Senses
Nov 12, 2013 10:28:47 GMT -5
Post by silver on Nov 12, 2013 10:28:47 GMT -5
Apparently it is too much to ask. This forum needs a good mod that people respect. This means that sometimes you have to sacrifice your tendency for obscure jokes and sarcasm. If you don't do that then fewer people will take you seriously. I for one am disappointed in you. I've made a very simple and clear request (and not for the first time). Nothing to misunderstand about it. And then you reply in this way? I just don't get it. You putting yourself-up again fudge-packer? Except for you, I was gonna go all serious-like... I think the fudge-packer has a point or two...I really do.
|
|
|
Senses
Nov 12, 2013 19:02:23 GMT -5
Post by laughter on Nov 12, 2013 19:02:23 GMT -5
Greetings.. Seems to contain an inside joke that, while not an attack, and thereby not subject to direct no-attack-moderation, is unsuitable for a NAT, but of course, this isn't a NAT. So, as a moderator, you're okay with 'not suitable' as your representation of the forum's decorum? Be well.. Your reply here sounds as if you are confused. The post is not unsuitable given the context (the thread that it's in isn't marked NAT). As far as the forum's decorum is concerned, my appointment has, so far, only impacted the NAT's .... as I mentioned in my moderator-intro, nothing else has changed.
|
|
|
Senses
Nov 12, 2013 19:41:42 GMT -5
Post by laughter on Nov 12, 2013 19:41:42 GMT -5
Apparently it is too much to ask. This forum needs a good mod that people respect. This means that sometimes you have to sacrifice your tendency for obscure jokes and sarcasm. If you don't do that then fewer people will take you seriously. I for one am disappointed in you. I've made a very simple and clear request (and not for the first time). Nothing to misunderstand about it. And then you reply in this way? I just don't get it.Seems as if you're not sure if you're Joe Bauers or not ....
|
|
|
Senses
Nov 12, 2013 20:53:12 GMT -5
Post by laughter on Nov 12, 2013 20:53:12 GMT -5
Greetings.. It's like he says, 'the blue jeans I'm wearing are not suitable for a formal dinner, but of course this is not a formal dinner', to which you replay, 'Are you okay with not suitable'? Your words look like a purposeful distortion. Are they? No.. it's a curiosity about the ethics of an activist moderator.. your question looks like a purposeful attempt to influence the perceptions of others, creating the illusion that i might distort Laughter's words, is it? Be well.. Uh-huh ... activist in what way, exactly? Here's a bit of ethics for you: you seem to have no compunction about polluting the unmoderated version of this thread with a conversation about moderation. That wouldn't be allowed in a NAT. As it's not a NAT, I'm not gonna' do anything about it.
|
|
|
Senses
Nov 12, 2013 21:54:15 GMT -5
Post by acewall on Nov 12, 2013 21:54:15 GMT -5
You putting yourself-up again fudge-packer? Except for you, I was gonna go all serious-like... I think the fudge-packer has a point or two...I really do. I was drawn to his expletives... still awaiting a connection.
|
|
|
Senses
Nov 13, 2013 9:51:55 GMT -5
Post by laughter on Nov 13, 2013 9:51:55 GMT -5
Greetings.. A more aggressive level of discussion is permissible in non-NAT's, and I see value in it in terms of direct, honest, open communication. Why would you challenge the ethics of a moderator who adhere's to those guidelines? Regardless, what I was challenging was the way you did it, and I've already adequately described that. You are, of course, free to distract from that challenge by trying to make it appear that I'm being manipulative instead of you. That's the challenge, are you so infatuated with boorish behavior that you cannot engage in direct open and honest discussion without that level of illusion? I challenge a moderator who contributes to the illusion being perpetrated, where the message is oneness, but the deeds are divisive and self-fulfilling, revealing his attachment to divisiveness and creating conflict.. you know, the same tactics you use under the guise of 'helping' others agree with your version of 'truth'.. Be well.. Oh yes, how soon we forget ... and I'm sorry Tzu', but simply forgetting soon is not the same as coming empty. I can't know your subjective state for a certainty but it sure seems to me as though the reason that you challenge is the same reason that mountaineers climb.
|
|
|
Senses
Nov 13, 2013 20:54:03 GMT -5
Post by enigma on Nov 13, 2013 20:54:03 GMT -5
You putting yourself-up again fudge-packer? Except for you, I was gonna go all serious-like... I think the fudge-packer has a point or two...I really do. Really? I see no point at all, and the thought occurred to report his post.
|
|
|
Senses
Nov 13, 2013 20:57:04 GMT -5
Post by enigma on Nov 13, 2013 20:57:04 GMT -5
Except for you, I was gonna go all serious-like... I think the fudge-packer has a point or two...I really do. I was drawn to his expletives... still awaiting a connection. Oh, was that originally said in a Q post??
|
|
|
Senses
Nov 13, 2013 21:38:33 GMT -5
Post by ???????? ???????????? on Nov 13, 2013 21:38:33 GMT -5
I was drawn to his expletives... still awaiting a connection. Oh, was that originally said in a Q post?? No. I had to look up what fudge-packer means and I was disgusted. Some people here are really weird.
|
|
|
Senses
Nov 13, 2013 21:43:23 GMT -5
Post by tzujanli on Nov 13, 2013 21:43:23 GMT -5
Greetings.. Greetings.. That's the challenge, are you so infatuated with boorish behavior that you cannot engage in direct open and honest discussion without that level of illusion? I challenge a moderator who contributes to the illusion being perpetrated, where the message is oneness, but the deeds are divisive and self-fulfilling, revealing his attachment to divisiveness and creating conflict.. you know, the same tactics you use under the guise of 'helping' others agree with your version of 'truth'.. Be well.. Oh yes, how soon we forget ... and I'm sorry Tzu', but simply forgetting soon is not the same as coming empty. I can't know your subjective state for a certainty but it sure seems to me as though the reason that you challenge is the same reason that mountaineers climb. Cut the crap, Bill.. read the words, and stop manipulating the meaning to suit the message you want heard.. you are contributory to the forum's agenda of advancing the belief in 'oneness', non-duality, and neo-advaita.. you are quick to defend those quite capable and skilled at their own defense, just to add the weight of your support to the forum's agenda and the club's enforcement of it.. yes, 'enforcement', the ridiculing, intimidating, and provoking carried-out by a few members and emulated by a few more, under the guise of helping others, but the help is not fair or balanced, it is aligned with the forum's agenda.. 'help', intended to 'break' the victim's spirit so it can be reshaped by the oneness agenda is not 'help'.. 'help' is empowering others to see/experience what is actually happening for themselves, not as described through propaganda and illusion enforced by allowing the rules to be exploited in favor of the forum's favored beliefs.. Be well..
|
|