|
Post by silence on Jul 11, 2013 21:17:20 GMT -5
Greetings.. Jesus. as portrayed in the bible, is aware that he is Part and Whole simultaneously.. experiencing which or both by where he directs his attention.. LOL.. in case you missed the footnotes, the bible was written to fit into a particular culture's beliefs.. Be well.. What a coinkidink that they match your beliefs.
|
|
|
Post by tzujanli on Jul 11, 2013 23:16:18 GMT -5
Greetings.. Greetings.. LOL.. in case you missed the footnotes, the bible was written to fit into a particular culture's beliefs.. Be well.. What a coinkidink that they match your beliefs. You really are not interested in a conversation, are you? Your interest seems to be in making 'Tzu' appear wrong, so.. rather than you stumbling around in your own version of mind, i'll help you out.. there is very little about the Bible that matches my understandings.. Be well..
|
|
|
Post by silence on Jul 12, 2013 0:01:10 GMT -5
Greetings.. What a coinkidink that they match your beliefs. You really are not interested in a conversation, are you? Your interest seems to be in making 'Tzu' appear wrong, so.. rather than you stumbling around in your own version of mind, i'll help you out.. there is very little about the Bible that matches my understandings.. Be well.. You said, "Jesus. as portrayed in the bible, is aware that he is Part and Whole simultaneously.. experiencing which or both by where he directs his attention" That sounds exactly like what you say. Is it not?
|
|
|
Post by tzujanli on Jul 12, 2013 7:58:41 GMT -5
Greetings.. Greetings.. You really are not interested in a conversation, are you? Your interest seems to be in making 'Tzu' appear wrong, so.. rather than you stumbling around in your own version of mind, i'll help you out.. there is very little about the Bible that matches my understandings.. Be well.. You said, "Jesus. as portrayed in the bible, is aware that he is Part and Whole simultaneously.. experiencing which or both by where he directs his attention" That sounds exactly like what you say. Is it not? Yes, that is exactly what i posted.. yes, it is my understanding some of the words attributed to Jesus, but.. i am not attached to the interpretation, that those words resonate with my understandings is only valid unless or until an alternative understanding reveals itself.. Be well..
|
|
|
Post by silence on Jul 12, 2013 9:28:14 GMT -5
Greetings.. You said, "Jesus. as portrayed in the bible, is aware that he is Part and Whole simultaneously.. experiencing which or both by where he directs his attention" That sounds exactly like what you say. Is it not? Yes, that is exactly what i posted.. yes, it is my understanding some of the words attributed to Jesus, but.. i am not attached to the interpretation, that those words resonate with my understandings is only valid unless or until an alternative understanding reveals itself.. Be well.. All you do is switch belief for understanding when you talk about yourself. It's not really that tricky.
|
|
|
Post by tzujanli on Jul 12, 2013 9:31:50 GMT -5
Greetings.. Greetings.. Yes, that is exactly what i posted.. yes, it is my understanding some of the words attributed to Jesus, but.. i am not attached to the interpretation, that those words resonate with my understandings is only valid unless or until an alternative understanding reveals itself.. Be well.. All you do is switch belief for understanding when you talk about yourself. It's not really that tricky. It is my 'understanding' that 'belief' represents an attachment without regard for evidence to the contrary.. and an 'understanding' is open to revision.. It's not really that tricky. Be well..
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Jul 12, 2013 10:14:11 GMT -5
Greetings.. All you do is switch belief for understanding when you talk about yourself. It's not really that tricky. It is my 'understanding' that 'belief' represents an attachment without regard for evidence to the contrary.. and an 'understanding' is open to revision.. It's not really that tricky. Be well.. What seems unopen for revision is this distinction based on "regard for evidence to the contrary". It is one without a difference. Evaluation of evidence based on a measure of accuracy in your mind creates the difference in your mind.
|
|
|
Post by tzujanli on Jul 12, 2013 10:36:37 GMT -5
Greetings.. Greetings.. It is my 'understanding' that 'belief' represents an attachment without regard for evidence to the contrary.. and an 'understanding' is open to revision.. It's not really that tricky. Be well.. What seems unopen for revision is this distinction based on "regard for evidence to the contrary". It is one without a difference. Evaluation of evidence based on a measure of accuracy in your mind creates the difference in your mind. It is noteworthy that you are making distinctions in your mind based on the evidence you are reading, there's no "measure of accuracy", here, there is simply the resonance or lack thereof relative to your understandings and beliefs.. Be well..
|
|
|
Post by justlikeyou on Jul 12, 2013 12:59:48 GMT -5
Greetings.. All you do is switch belief for understanding when you talk about yourself. It's not really that tricky. It is my 'understanding' that 'belief' represents an attachment without regard for evidence to the contrary.. and an 'understanding' is open to revision.. It's not really that tricky. Be well.. Belief does not have to be attachment without regard to evidence of the contrary. In can be without evidence at all. Many believed the world flat without ever setting foot on a boat. On the other hand I could tell you that the moon was not made of cheese, and you could say where is the evidence? I could say I only have direct evidence. The fact that I can't prove it to you doesn't mean it isn't so. It just means that you choose not to believe me. It is a wise man who knows what he can't know and rest in that unknowing neither believing nor disbelieving.
|
|
|
Post by silence on Jul 12, 2013 17:11:39 GMT -5
Greetings.. All you do is switch belief for understanding when you talk about yourself. It's not really that tricky. It is my 'understanding' that 'belief' represents an attachment without regard for evidence to the contrary.. and an 'understanding' is open to revision.. It's not really that tricky. Be well.. You have folks presenting you with evidence to the contrary for just about all your beliefs. You immediately dismiss the evidence and proceed to label it an "understanding" while you go about the forum telling everyone to free themselves from beliefs.
|
|