|
Post by Reefs on Jul 11, 2013 21:37:08 GMT -5
That Reefs must be mighty! The entire forum is shaking in fear of his replies. No, but your input here does bring the standard down IMO. You're just so very manipulative and take pleasure in seeing what you call 'collapse'. You've really got no right to sell what you sell as non-duality. I'm not selling anything. You are the one who sells extreme spiritual arrogance and temper tantrums and nastiness as ease peace and joy and full embodiment of Christ Consciousness Energies.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 11, 2013 21:37:31 GMT -5
Any chance that you two could take this conversation to PM's? this rapid fire back and for in what seems to be a personal attrition has probably taken up 60 pages of this thread, and is an example of the "crowding" of the space that I was talking about awhile back ;-) Existence is all about resisting nothing. Haha, are you willing to defend that position?
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on Jul 11, 2013 21:38:05 GMT -5
Yes, what he says is VERY clear. And what he says contradicts your ontology. No it doesn't. He does talk very differently to me but he is pointing exactly to what I am pointing to. Oh, does he give you a private audience in your dreams?
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on Jul 11, 2013 21:40:11 GMT -5
Don't try to blind me with fantastic wording. I just look at the result and I see you've anchored yourself there. 'That' is straight from the identity poker table. You've anchored yourself there. Message from Niz to Andrew: I have no issue with that. Also though: ''With the transcendence of the knowledge ‘I am’, the Absolute prevails. The state is called ‘Parabrahman’, while the knowledge ‘I am’ is termed Brahman. This knowledge ‘I am’ or the beingness is illusion only. Therefore, when Brahman is transcended, only the ‘Parabrahman’ is, in which there is not even a trace of the knowledge ‘I am’.'' You do contradict all of it, both quotes because you know what, who and where you are. You are full of knowledge.
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on Jul 11, 2013 21:43:40 GMT -5
Haha, well at least you finally released your attachment to disguising how you really feel. I haven't been hiding how I feel. Yes, lately, you couldn't hide it anymore.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 11, 2013 21:49:24 GMT -5
I haven't been hiding how I feel. Yes, lately, you couldn't hide it anymore. Secret Lovers?
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on Jul 11, 2013 21:51:09 GMT -5
The result is the same. Only different wording. I don't get fooled by different wordings. You do, because you take everything literally. Um, there's a huge difference between killed and dissolved/disappeared. Killed implies someone did the killing. Dissolved/disappeared does not. I killed it/she killed it/he killed it Nobody ever said I/she/he dissolved or disappeared it. They say it dissolved, or it disappeared. Likewise nobody ever says it killed it. In Andrewism, Andrew ALWAYS takes the credit for everything progress related. So even if it is stated in a passive way, in the end Andrew will take credit for what happened. Don't get fooled by wording. Look at the result. Andrewism means endless doing suggestions for doers in non-being disguise. Andrewism means great certainty in speculation/non-knowing disguise. Andrewism means being anchored in a fiexed idea in a positionless position disguise. Andrewism means temper tantrums in a full embodiment of Christ Consciousness Energies disguise. Andrewism means being done in a never-done disguise... and so on and so forth. Just look at the contradictions and what he's doing, don't cling to the fantastic wording. And it will be clear.
|
|
|
Post by serpentqueen on Jul 11, 2013 21:59:47 GMT -5
Existence is all about resisting nothing. Haha, are you willing to defend that position? Sure, I can "defend" for purposes of seeing if it holds water, maybe it doesn't, maybe it just sounds cool. It's just something I've been playing around with in my head for awhile. But start a new thread? And tomorrow, cuz it's late.
|
|
|
Post by serpentqueen on Jul 11, 2013 22:16:39 GMT -5
Um, there's a huge difference between killed and dissolved/disappeared. Killed implies someone did the killing. Dissolved/disappeared does not. I killed it/she killed it/he killed it Nobody ever said I/she/he dissolved or disappeared it. They say it dissolved, or it disappeared. Likewise nobody ever says it killed it. In Andrewism, Andrew ALWAYS takes the credit for everything progress related. So even if it is stated in a passive way, in the end Andrew will take credit for what happened. Don't get fooled by wording. Look at the result. Andrewism means endless doing suggestions for doers in non-being disguise. Andrewism means great certainty in speculation/non-knowing disguise. Andrewism means being anchored in a fiexed idea in a positionless position disguise. Andrewism means temper tantrums in a full embodiment of Christ Consciousness Energies disguise. Andrewism means being done in a never-done disguise... and so on and so forth. Just look at the contradictions and what he's doing, don't cling to the fantastic wording. And it will be clear. My comment wasn't about Andrew; I haven't been here long enough. I also haven't been here long enough to have formed much of an opinion/story about you either. My comment was in relation to this post only. It was impersonal comment about the words chosen. Had Andrew written it, I'd have written the same post.
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on Jul 11, 2013 23:43:30 GMT -5
In Andrewism, Andrew ALWAYS takes the credit for everything progress related. So even if it is stated in a passive way, in the end Andrew will take credit for what happened. Don't get fooled by wording. Look at the result. Andrewism means endless doing suggestions for doers in non-being disguise. Andrewism means great certainty in speculation/non-knowing disguise. Andrewism means being anchored in a fiexed idea in a positionless position disguise. Andrewism means temper tantrums in a full embodiment of Christ Consciousness Energies disguise. Andrewism means being done in a never-done disguise... and so on and so forth. Just look at the contradictions and what he's doing, don't cling to the fantastic wording. And it will be clear. My comment wasn't about Andrew; I haven't been here long enough. I also haven't been here long enough to have formed much of an opinion/story about you either. My comment was in relation to this post only. It was impersonal comment about the words chosen. Had Andrew written it, I'd have written the same post. So your comment was doadally out of context?
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Jul 11, 2013 23:55:55 GMT -5
In this particular version of the game, all cards are wild, which allows for maximum freedom, and nobody is ever certain who won, though wild speculation is strongly encouraged. Speculation-less speculation of course. Oh, yes, I'm certainlessly certain of it.
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on Jul 12, 2013 0:00:38 GMT -5
Yes, lately, you couldn't hide it anymore. Secret Lovers? Are you simultaneously posting with 2 account now?
|
|
|
Post by silence on Jul 12, 2013 0:02:16 GMT -5
Speculation-less speculation of course. Oh, yes, I'm certainlessly certain of it. Excellently excellent!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 12, 2013 0:58:48 GMT -5
Often so-called inanimate objects look quite alive to me. A chair, a table, a lamp. Is this just me? I talk to the rocks interspersed throughout the yard. "Hey! How's it going? You're looking well. Is the balance of sun and shade ok? I'm gonna get the hose out and water in a moment. I'll be back..." Sometimes I'll just break out in a song.... Like a rock I was strong as I could be Like a rock Nothing ever got to me... They seem to like that one. Reminding children that they can also animate the elementals is sweet.
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Jul 12, 2013 1:07:37 GMT -5
The result is the same. Only different wording. I don't get fooled by different wordings. You do, because you take everything literally. Um, there's a huge difference between killed and dissolved/disappeared. Killed implies someone did the killing. Dissolved/disappeared does not. I killed it/she killed it/he killed it Nobody ever said I/she/he dissolved or disappeared it. They say it dissolved, or it disappeared. Likewise nobody ever says it killed it. Both descriptions are just metaphorical anyway, and so the question is, do both metaphors describe the same thing. (Nobody's talking about actually being killed or dissolved physically)
|
|