|
Post by laughter on Jul 2, 2013 14:07:01 GMT -5
tzu's sense of humor is actually quite keen There are more than 3/5 morpheme changes between hemophiliac and homophobia, my pun detector is calibrated to 2/5 or less... yes, I said his sense of humor is keen .... I didn't say anything about his talent at generating it ... at least intentionally that is! ...
|
|
|
Post by topology on Jul 2, 2013 16:38:31 GMT -5
There are more than 3/5 morpheme changes between hemophiliac and homophobia, my pun detector is calibrated to 2/5 or less... yes, I said his sense of humor is keen .... I didn't say anything about his talent at generating it ... at least intentionally that is! ... What?!? there's a distinction between the reader and the writer?? Say it ain't so!
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Jul 2, 2013 16:44:45 GMT -5
yes, I said his sense of humor is keen .... I didn't say anything about his talent at generating it ... at least intentionally that is! ... What?!? there's a distinction between the reader and the writer?? Say it ain't so! yes ... that's the rumor anyway .... another really wild bit of gossip I hear being slung about is that it's actually the reader that puts most of the meaning into the words on a page ...
|
|
|
Post by tzujanli on Jul 2, 2013 16:54:13 GMT -5
Greetings.. What?!? there's a distinction between the reader and the writer?? Say it ain't so! yes ... that's the rumor anyway .... another really wild bit of gossip I hear being slung about is that it's actually the reader that puts most of the meaning into the words on a page ... Yeah.. i've seen a fair bit of posts that were authored without regard to meaning.. Be well..
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Jul 2, 2013 23:16:54 GMT -5
Greetings.. It's not about 'gauging'.. if someone is attached to 'what is seen', clarity is diminished.. in the attachment, the pure clarity of continued presence, continued unconditional 'looking', that attachment disrupts the awareness of what is actually happening.. so, when people say this is this, or that is that, it's clear they are attached to this or that.. no gauging is needed, it is self-evident.. Be well.. How are you gauging when someone is attached or not? It looks like you are applying a heuristic, which means you are not feeling for the truth of the matter. Your assessment is static/inert. If someone's text contains "this is this and that is that" then they are attached. That is a fairly naive heuristic that says the only non-attached person is the one that doesn't say a word. If one holds certain beliefs to be true, then they cease to appear as beliefs and look like truths to the believer. Others who don't agree with those beliefs will be viewed as the believers who are in denial of the truth. If they are not prepared to change their perspective, then it will appear that they are attached to those beliefs. The whole process really has nothing to do with either what's true or who's attached.
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Jul 2, 2013 23:27:06 GMT -5
Greetings.. How are you gauging when someone is attached or not? It looks like you are applying a heuristic, which means you are not feeling for the truth of the matter. Your assessment is static/inert. If someone's text contains "this is this and that is that" then they are attached. That is a fairly naive heuristic that says the only non-attached person is the one that doesn't say a word. Consistently, you overlay your opinion of what i post on that post then comment on your opinion of my post.. That's generally what happens on discussion forums. Folks form opinions about posts and respond with and about those opinions. You do the same. Why do you have an issue with that? So as long as one is continually changing their viewpoint, then you won't label them as attached? You seem to have certain ideas that you repeat over and over. Shouldn't there be a fluid dynamism in your views?
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Jul 2, 2013 23:43:07 GMT -5
Greetings.. yes ... that's the rumor anyway .... another really wild bit of gossip I hear being slung about is that it's actually the reader that puts most of the meaning into the words on a page ... Yeah.. i've seen a fair bit of posts that were authored without regard to meaning.. Be well.. I get it. That was a hemophobliac dig at Laughter. HA!
|
|
|
Post by tzujanli on Jul 3, 2013 0:42:03 GMT -5
Greetings.. Greetings.. Consistently, you overlay your opinion of what i post on that post then comment on your opinion of my post.. That's generally what happens on discussion forums. Folks form opinions about posts and respond with and about those opinions. You do the same. Why do you have an issue with that? So as long as one is continually changing their viewpoint, then you won't label them as attached? You seem to have certain ideas that you repeat over and over. Shouldn't there be a fluid dynamism in your views? There is, i keep paying attention at what's happening.. rather than assuming i know the 'truth'.. Be well..
|
|
|
Post by tzujanli on Jul 3, 2013 0:45:30 GMT -5
Greetings.. Greetings.. Yeah.. i've seen a fair bit of posts that were authored without regard to meaning.. Be well.. I get it. That was a hemophobliac dig at Laughter. HA! See?.. you say the words, but the evidence suggests otherwise.. Be well..
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Jul 3, 2013 2:29:07 GMT -5
Greetings.. That's generally what happens on discussion forums. Folks form opinions about posts and respond with and about those opinions. You do the same. Why do you have an issue with that? So as long as one is continually changing their viewpoint, then you won't label them as attached? You seem to have certain ideas that you repeat over and over. Shouldn't there be a fluid dynamism in your views? There is, i keep paying attention at what's happening.. rather than assuming i know the 'truth'.. Be well.. How convenient that what you keep seeing with your 'still mind' is the same delusion over and over.
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Jul 3, 2013 5:45:12 GMT -5
Greetings.. It's not natural for you to speak plainly, is it? Be well.. Either you are playing coy or I've misoverestimated your ability to discern that your content was about talking while mine was about walking.
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Jul 3, 2013 5:49:17 GMT -5
Greetings.. Yeah.. i've seen a fair bit of posts that were authored without regard to meaning.. Be well.. I get it. That was a hemophobliac dig at Laughter. HA! It really is the epitome of unconsciousness to refuse to take responsibility for oneself. In this instance, although it's wrapped in a joke, there is this stubborn refusal to admit that the writer does not think the thoughts of the reader for the reader.
|
|
|
Post by tzujanli on Jul 3, 2013 8:09:21 GMT -5
Greetings.. I get it. That was a hemophobliac dig at Laughter. HA! It really is the epitome of unconsciousness to refuse to take responsibility for oneself. In this instance, although it's wrapped in a joke, there is this stubborn refusal to admit that the writer does not think the thoughts of the reader for the reader. I'm not interested in the illusions you try to create, the riddles you converse in only serve to reveal your slavery to your intellect.. you ask for me to admit the obvious, while creating the illusion i don't take responsibility for myself.. the obvious speaks for itself, you misrepresent what is actually happening, why? why not take responsibility for 'your' intentions and speak plainly, and answer question plainly? Be well..
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Jul 3, 2013 13:27:17 GMT -5
Greetings.. It really is the epitome of unconsciousness to refuse to take responsibility for oneself. In this instance, although it's wrapped in a joke, there is this stubborn refusal to admit that the writer does not think the thoughts of the reader for the reader. I'm not interested in the illusions you try to create, the riddles you converse in only serve to reveal your slavery to your intellect.. you ask for me to admit the obvious, while creating the illusion i don't take responsibility for myself.. the obvious speaks for itself, you misrepresent what is actually happening, why? why not take responsibility for 'your' intentions and speak plainly, and answer question plainly? Be well.. awwwwwwwwwwww whatsa matter Bobby you get up on the wrong side of the bed today?
|
|
|
Post by lolly on Jul 14, 2013 22:03:38 GMT -5
I'm glad to interject... I was away and now I came back... and it may seem that I chose that trip, but actually, I needed to get out of here, and I'm glad I did, yet I also came back and it's quite appropriate this post appears beneath an image of the dark cloud that precedes it. I'm not here because it's where I want to be you see, I'm here because it's necessary to endure it to get something else I want, a means to another end, so it seems to me that my choice for one thing gives rise to that which I do not choose.
|
|