|
|
Post by silver on Jun 25, 2013 14:03:40 GMT -5
where you at bro? ;-)  Everyone knows it's the shadow hedgies that used to own Godman Sachs ... Verizon's jest theys mouthpiece ... Cool map. |
|
|
|
Post by silver on Jun 25, 2013 14:05:18 GMT -5
Irrelevant - moot - impotent...............Their ways and means inherently are designed to hog-tie and stifle those with, what in their estimation is a decided nondualistic-type - even those who come here in all sincerity, to absorb, drink in, or otherwise learn about something they've never experienced or performed or even enjoyed before - thereby stunting and discouraging most, if not any new blood / those with even a miniscule amount of ability. Theretofore, it is only through such mesmerizations and brainwashing that they will 'come' to 'believe'. Tsk, tsk....just sick. who wrote the words that I'm responding to here? who had the feelings that drove their authoring? who thought the thoughts that were rendered into words? Reefs? Enigma? Me? ..... nope. Steppin' out again, ay? |
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Jun 25, 2013 14:26:02 GMT -5
who wrote the words that I'm responding to here? who had the feelings that drove their authoring? who thought the thoughts that were rendered into words? Reefs? Enigma? Me? ..... nope. Steppin' out again, ay? I don't catch your drift. Out to where, exactly? |
|
|
|
Post by silver on Jun 25, 2013 14:28:58 GMT -5
I don't catch your drift. Out to where, exactly? Lights on, but nobody home - it's my way / attempt to speak of the dual v nondual angle of yes individual person / no individual person. |
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Jun 25, 2013 14:44:48 GMT -5
I don't catch your drift. Out to where, exactly? Lights on, but nobody home - it's my way / attempt to speak of the dual v nondual angle of yes individual person / no individual person. Sorry but following up one cryptic metaphor with another doesn't help me understand what you're trying to convey! What does anything in what I've said in this thread since it's revival have to do with nonduality or the nature of personhood? Are you referring to my reference, in turn, to "E&R's perspective"? |
|
|
|
Post by silver on Jun 25, 2013 15:08:46 GMT -5
Lights on, but nobody home - it's my way / attempt to speak of the dual v nondual angle of yes individual person / no individual person. Sorry but following up one cryptic metaphor with another doesn't help me understand what you're trying to convey! What does anything in what I've said in this thread since it's revival have to do with nonduality or the nature of personhood? Are you referring to my reference, in turn, to "E&R's perspective"?  As I looked over the posts involved, I thought to myself, this is not going to end well - or it's not going to end, period. Someone once posted recently something along the lines of if you can't explain it to a 7-year-old, then something's wrong. I don't know how to explain, then. |
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Jun 25, 2013 15:27:09 GMT -5
Sorry but following up one cryptic metaphor with another doesn't help me understand what you're trying to convey! What does anything in what I've said in this thread since it's revival have to do with nonduality or the nature of personhood? Are you referring to my reference, in turn, to "E&R's perspective"? As I looked over the posts involved, I thought to myself, this is not going to end well - or it's not going to end, period. Someone once posted recently something along the lines of if you can't explain it to a 7-year-old, then something's wrong. I don't know how to explain, then. Well I get the impression that you want to say something to me but you're holding back. Don't worry. I'm a big guy and can take it and will still love you in the morning. The idea of recognizing that you have control of and thereby responsibility for your internal state of mind and reactions to external stimuli actually flies in the face of nonduality as it pivots on reference to a localized, separate personal self. As a paradox-embracing, card-carrying member of the club of perpetually confused ambiguity I don't have a problem with that. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 2, 2013 15:44:21 GMT -5
Hey Laffy .. I know you bleed red white and blue .. and I know you read the news .. so what's up in Egypt? Do these pictures make you wanna fire up the drones?    |
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Jul 2, 2013 16:17:31 GMT -5
Hey Laffy .. I know you bleed red white and blue .. and I know you read the news .. so what's up in Egypt? Do these pictures make you wanna fire up the drones? The lesson from the Arab Spring seems to be that a dictatorship can't survive social media. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 2, 2013 16:30:09 GMT -5
The lesson from the Arab Spring seems to be that a dictatorship can't survive social media. Dictator is an interesting word. ;-) |
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Jul 2, 2013 19:11:03 GMT -5
The lesson from the Arab Spring seems to be that a dictatorship can't survive social media. Dictator is an interesting word. ;-) As is, in the context of Egypt today, the word "democracy". |
|
As I looked over the posts involved, I thought to myself, this is not going to end well - or it's not going to end, period. 