|
|
Post by laughter on Jul 17, 2015 21:16:41 GMT -5
Man I must be way too deep in the consensus trance perpetuated by the lizard people as I can't find enough oomph to care about fake beatles... I used to read New Dawn and the other conspiracy magazine, but never felt like it went anywhere and that there was some weird insular dark dynamic with the whole thing - forever telling people the intricacies of how they were being lied to and manipulated and forever offering solutions of how to be free (EMF protectors, colodial silver etc). I think they were more interested in the exciting drama of the whole thing rather than actually being free. Yes you're just the kind of hypnotized zombie that the evil alien overlords are counting on. It was a smart move cloning Sir Paul because peeps would have gotten suspicious if his death had actually been announced. Obviously ND has been infiltrated in order to assure that they will never become credible. I sleep well at night knowing that andy and jimmygoat are fighting the good fight for all the rest of us though, don't you? |
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Jul 17, 2015 21:30:53 GMT -5
"hopeless" was a joke that refers to this endless cycle that you're in. It was in response to this, which was overtly hostile and condescending, and in reply to something that wasn't even directed to you personally. So now you characterize your "please explain how you reached your judgement" as "calm" and "polite" but it was anything but, if, for no other reason that it was prefaced by this: You took yet another light joke and took it literally. Literally speaking, your conclusion is incorrect: popee might very well be capable of adding to the discussion if he were interested in it. What you wrote was rude and obviously very insulting and you know what? -- in terms of your correspondence with members you don't like/oppose, it's a very apt description of what you write. Your image of yourself is completely out of whack with your content. It's as if Bill Gates were to claim he wasn't greedy or Charlie Manson were to think of himself as kind and gentle. Like i said, when calmly and politely confronted, those i mentioned feel uncomfortable, feeling threatened, attacked, even a simple question is perceived as one. It's amusing that you characterize your insulting rants as polite and assume that this makes me feel uncomfortable. I assure you jimmygoat, that when I reply to you it's like wearin' a pair of old shoes.  I forgot to mention in the list of responses of ending a conversation or offering more insults, many of you gush forth with really badly constructed arguments, in order to divert attention away from the current issue of discussing yourselves while making a case to show you are the actual victims in the exchanges. You couldn't argue your way out of a paper bag man, you're simply a debate-legend in yer own mind. If you insult me, why shouldn't I insult you back? Your characterization of "gush forth with really badly constructed arguments" is as factually inaccurate as it is disparaging, and yet your constant complaint is about the disparagement you receive in return. If you want respect, give it. Dood, if popee(or anyone else of similar characteristics) does not have the capacity to stand up for himself, you do not have to intercede on his behalf...though you do seem to get so disturbed that you have to say something. Nor does it bother me how you interpret reality. I clearly see popee said disparaging things about me, so i confronted him calmly and politely. Nor do i accept people's excuse that their insults were not actually insults because they were just having fun and were joking around. Nah, popee can take care of himself if he wants to, but my guess is that he doesn't see you as worth the trouble. I was just answering all your third-party trolling in which you were addressing me indirectly on the topic of how I never explained my negative opinions of you. Now, if you continue to rant and rave on that topic you'll be ignoring he facts. I'm explaining in detail the basis for those negative opinions. No, you are not polite. You are incessantly insulting. No, I am not disturbed. It is most likely something you have zero reference for, but it is possible to witness your attempts to insult without feeling anything, and I assure you, that at most I feel the sort of annoyance at being bitten by a mosquito. As for the rest of your post, i had chosen a long time ago to not waste my time sorting issues out with someone who argues with immature arguments like, 'You weren't there, so you wouldn't know.' Oh, are you claiming that I offered that as an argument, or is that just a hypothetical? If the latter, what is the analogous argument that I've made along those lines? You see, this is also quite insulting, this habit you have of weaving your fantasies about me into your writing about me as if your delusions had any semblance to reality. Nothing very polite about it at all, and the more you write about how calm you feel the less I believe you. Your venting only adds weight to my speculations, and for future reference, if i am asking a person about something about themselves, this is not a signal that i want your input, though it seems some trigger went off in you. If popee has nothing further to discuss about his disparaging comments to\about me and andrew, then my convo with him is over.  dude you are one long continuous vent, and if I want to comment on what spews out of it that's your misfortune, because I can tell by what you're writing that you don't like to read it. Too bad.  But please, and with genuine sincerity, Envy Adams and popee, this in no way means i am trying to influence you two and others like you, from ceasing expression of your usual self righteous, condescending, disrespectful, insultive thoughts about things and people you do not like or agree with. Most of you seem to really enjoy being this way, and appear to perceive you are not doing anything wrong that would require adjustment of your behavior for the well being of others, even when they either request it or clearly express they do not appreciate your current mode of interaction.  Me, i think the more you express what's really in your hearts and minds is helpful for others to make informed decisions on whether they should engage in conversation with you, whether they see any worthwhile benefit to the topic of discussion. As for you jimmygoat. You've made it very clear who and what you are. It's too bad that this is what you're looking for. There's no need for it at all. |
|
|
|
Post by andrew on Jul 18, 2015 5:47:58 GMT -5
It occured to me that if they really wanted to find out about Paul McCartney, checking his voice before and after should reveal some things, no? How would they find a look-a-like and a voice that's a 100% accurate? Sure, the voice changes but there would have to be some considerable change when listening to dead Paul and new Paul. Yes, checking the voice seems like an obvious step. There is a professor in America that did a voice comparison and concluded that there was more than one Paul McCartney (though I suspect that there would be other folks saying otherwise!). There is also an interesting looking youtube video that does a voice comparison but it's not in English so I can only get a gist of what is being said. For some reason my 'paste' button isn't working right now, but if you are interested, search under 'faul mccartney voice comparison'. Maybe you will understand better than me. Jay, very much appreciating your messages but don't have much time right now to comment, will try and get back to you when I've got more time. I also found that 'faked' video when I was researching. Naughty people! Oh, just quickly, I was watching a video the other night on how the film 'Back to the Future' relates to 9/11, have a look sometime if you are interested. I found some of the links between the movie and the event pretty tenuous I have to say, but on the other hand, there are some very interesting bits that got me wondering. Again, I find it fascinating from the point of view of wondering just how deep the rabbit hole goes. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 18, 2015 6:51:41 GMT -5
wasn't very hungry to begin with  Jimmygoats double bind was obviously misconceived, as there's nothing really all that substantive about conspiracy theories and if you hadn't created the thread noone would have had any interests in pursuing the topics in the MT anyway. now you're just speculating and when has a lack of substance ever stopped anyone before?  besides, maybe this kind of intense TMT can be useful, the crazy thoughts might reach critical mass and lead to a more substantive examination |
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Jul 18, 2015 11:34:07 GMT -5
Jimmygoats double bind was obviously misconceived, as there's nothing really all that substantive about conspiracy theories and if you hadn't created the thread noone would have had any interests in pursuing the topics in the MT anyway. now you're just speculating and when has a lack of substance ever stopped anyone before? besides, maybe this kind of intense TMT can be useful, the crazy thoughts might reach critical mass and lead to a more substantive examination They certainly are revealing, yes. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 18, 2015 15:55:29 GMT -5
the Earth turns without you
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 18, 2015 16:54:24 GMT -5
it's one fücking opinion after another... |
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Jul 18, 2015 17:28:23 GMT -5
the Earth turns without you  no! this kant be true! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 18, 2015 17:58:53 GMT -5
even if you could do anything, which you can't, it wouldn't make one bit of difference |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 18, 2015 18:27:27 GMT -5
the Earth turns without you ! this kant be true! as Source says, "it's just a thought", so whatever that means, I'm sticking with it |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2015 10:55:06 GMT -5
Tweet
Brian Cox ✔@profbriancox
I've said it before and I'll say it again - if you don't think Apollo 11 landed on Moon you are a colossal nob end & should get a new brain
10:17 AM - 20 Jul 2015
5,345 5,345 Retweets 5,669 5,669 favorites
Buzz Aldrin punches a conspiracist xtian idiot
|
|
|
|
Post by earnest on Jul 21, 2015 16:40:38 GMT -5
Tweet Brian Cox ✔@profbriancox I've said it before and I'll say it again - if you don't think Apollo 11 landed on Moon you are a colossal nob end & should get a new brain 10:17 AM - 20 Jul 2015 5,345 5,345 Retweets 5,669 5,669 favorites Buzz Aldrin punches a conspiracist xtian idiot Now that's a lunar(tic) landing!! |
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Jul 21, 2015 20:07:20 GMT -5
Tweet Brian Cox ✔@profbriancox I've said it before and I'll say it again - if you don't think Apollo 11 landed on Moon you are a colossal nob end & should get a new brain 10:17 AM - 20 Jul 2015 5,345 5,345 Retweets 5,669 5,669 favorites Buzz Aldrin punches a conspiracist xtian idiot |
|
|
|
Post by jay17 on Jul 22, 2015 5:14:01 GMT -5
So anyways, here's some conspiracies that have been confirmed as fact. Several of them being about governments willfully causing harm to the people they are meant to be serving. |
|
|
|
Post by jay17 on Jul 23, 2015 13:53:53 GMT -5
9\11 controlled demolitions
|
|
dude you are one long continuous vent, and if I want to comment on what spews out of it that's your misfortune, because I can tell by what you're writing that you don't like to read it. 
no! this kant be true!
