|
Post by enigma on Dec 28, 2014 1:55:19 GMT -5
Your problem is your pattern of hijacking the discussion with your aggressively outspoken agenda. ...................... Do you have any issues with it now?
|
|
|
Post by silver on Dec 28, 2014 2:17:40 GMT -5
I don't know what you're referring to by "it", but I don't think so. There's nothing left in the quote boxes to refer to and I'm about ready to go to bed. z z z
|
|
|
Post by figgles on Dec 28, 2014 11:51:26 GMT -5
It doesn't? So, one could be absolutely mired in a thought about the heaviness and darkness of others to the point where it's the predominant thought at the forefront on an ongoing, incessant basis, and that has no bearing on vibration or visa-versa? By "air time" I figure you mean how often it's talked about here, as that has been your reference in the past. As such, no it doesn't. No, I mean 'air-time' as in thinking/focus....amount of time attention is focused upon that as being the actuality..... That said, I suppose if one were here talking about how he sees darkness and heaviness in others, and arguing incessantly for that being the case here for hours per day, that just might qualify. ;)hehe..........can't really say though that I see that happening.....
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Dec 28, 2014 12:27:51 GMT -5
By "air time" I figure you mean how often it's talked about here, as that has been your reference in the past. As such, no it doesn't. No, I mean 'air-time' as in thinking/focus....amount of time attention is focused upon that as being the actuality..... That said, I suppose if one were here talking about how he sees darkness and heaviness in others, and arguing incessantly for that being the case here for hours per day, that just might qualify. ;)hehe.......... can't really say though that I see that happening.....I thought that was eggzacly what you've been saying.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 28, 2014 12:33:31 GMT -5
No, I mean 'air-time' as in thinking/focus....amount of time attention is focused upon that as being the actuality..... That said, I suppose if one were here talking about how he sees darkness and heaviness in others, and arguing incessantly for that being the case here for hours per day, that just might qualify. ;)hehe.......... can't really say though that I see that happening.....I thought that was eggzacly what you've been saying. no kidding... why even say it if it wasn't on your mind? especially if you've said something similar hundreds of times before...
|
|
|
Post by figgles on Dec 28, 2014 12:49:37 GMT -5
No, I mean 'air-time' as in thinking/focus....amount of time attention is focused upon that as being the actuality..... That said, I suppose if one were here talking about how he sees darkness and heaviness in others, and arguing incessantly for that being the case here for hours per day, that just might qualify. ;)hehe.......... can't really say though that I see that happening.....I thought that was eggzacly what you've been saying. Not specifically as it relates to the subject matter of the discussions on this forum. I was more speaking to time in general, (either on or off forum) focused upon negative ideas about 'others' en masse.....an ongoing negative view of 'the world over' or even a focus upon that that gets entertained very often, and how that relates to "vibration." I don't necessarily see you (or anyone else in particular here) focused specifically and constantly upon negative ideas about the 'world as a whole' in every post you make here....that's what I meant by "can't really say though that I see that happening." And, re: my seeing of you as engaging negative thoughts about the world en masse, 'often' and thus, that being a reflection of a particular vibration, I'm not necessarily married to the idea....have actually been trying to explore and discuss the idea with you to garner more information; As I said in a past post:
Read more: spiritualteachers.proboards.com/user/1608/recent#ixzz3NDUtojOV
|
|
|
Post by figgles on Dec 28, 2014 12:56:27 GMT -5
I thought that was eggzacly what you've been saying. no kidding... why even say it if it wasn't on your mind? especially if you've said something similar hundreds of times before... ??..why even say "what" if it wasn't on your mind?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 28, 2014 13:10:55 GMT -5
no kidding... why even say it if it wasn't on your mind? especially if you've said something similar hundreds of times before... ??..why even say "what" if it wasn't on your mind? I didn't say "what" but if you insist... (read what you wrote)
|
|
|
Post by figgles on Dec 28, 2014 13:14:26 GMT -5
??..why even say "what" if it wasn't on your mind? I didn't say "what" but if you insist... (read what you wrote) Please read my post above to E if you're interested...I'm pretty sure I was saying something different to what you think I was saying...what you refer to by 'it.'
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 28, 2014 13:33:08 GMT -5
I didn't say "what" but if you insist... (read what you wrote) Please read my post above to E if you're interested...I'm pretty sure I was saying something different to what you think I was saying...what you refer to by 'it.' blah blah blah...hehe... can't really say though that I see that happening.....but never mind.... DIOIIDC is just a pipe dream anyhoo
|
|
|
Post by figgles on Dec 28, 2014 13:59:06 GMT -5
Please read my post above to E if you're interested...I'm pretty sure I was saying something different to what you think I was saying...what you refer to by 'it.' blah blah blah...hehe... can't really say though that I see that happening.....but never mind.... DIOIIDC is just a pipe dream anyhoo
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on Dec 29, 2014 9:05:35 GMT -5
Why would even assume that I would 'fully accept everything AH says as indisputable truth'? It's not at all new what they teach. Do the hermetic laws ring a bell, maybe? "Assuming" would take the form of a solid assertion. You might have noticed, I asked you a question; "Do you fully accept everything AH says as indisputable truth?" It was framed in a question, because I did not merely 'assume' that I knew the answer. Pay attention to what's being written. Your interest in finding fault with me is muddying your vision. You're very intelligent and usually very concise in communication when you do choose to communicate....you don't beat around the bush, are very good at getting straight to the point when you deem a point worthy of making, you are wordly and well-travelled which adds a richness of depth to your over-all world view, outlook. You are good at pushing buttons and that can at times be a very positive thing for those who are interested in finding out if they have buttons that still pop. You don't devolve into mushiness or sentiment unnecessarily. You've played around with enough esoteric/spiritual bizness that you are well-rounded in your knowledge of such (astrology, LOA, self help, non-duality, etc.), You can be very funny, able to see the lighter side of things when others have difficulty, You add a certain "spiciness" to the forum that helps keep things interesting.
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on Dec 29, 2014 9:10:29 GMT -5
What's so funny? One can still be open to the idea that some form of resistance is playing out while also fully acknowledging that if it is, I am not at present aware of it. Your denial of your denial. lol If resistance is not readily evident, the next best place to look is how one feels about the manifestation that is being deemed to have arisen from such...and if there is also no readily apparent resistance arising there in response, one could conclude that there really is no problem.....and I think even AH would agree that that's that's the perfect scenario from which things can evolve to their highest resolution. It's a funny thing, your tact here seems somewhat similar to a few folks in my life (LOA afficionados) who are intent upon making my health a serious issue that requires fixing, and who very much take issue with the idea that I do not regard it as a serious issue. I had one well meaning friend want to sit with me to pick apart my marriage, my relationship with kids, my childhood, all in hopes of uncovering the 'problem' that was behind my obvious resistance that had to be the cause of my physical symptoms. ...turns out, the genetic abnormality that is behind it all occurred in utero, hehe.... so now she's pushing for me to to try to dig back into past lives to find the cause. The more I tell her its a non-issue, that there is deep acceptance here of what's happening, the more perturbed she gets. Last time we visited, I asked her point blank; "Would you feel better if I were deeply emotionally upset by all this"? The question stymied her. She couldn't answer...but, the conversation shifted and she didn't bring my health up again that day. Actually, no. Your state of health is neither a good or bad thing. It just shows your blind spots and phoniness. That's all. So, what needs fixing is your unconsciousness and extreme spiritual arrogance if you should care about at least a basic level of credibility or should be interested in moving further into clarity. So far it seems you are not interested. So I think we've nothing left to discuss anymore. I wish you all the best anyway.
|
|
|
Post by figgles on Dec 29, 2014 15:59:46 GMT -5
"Assuming" would take the form of a solid assertion. You might have noticed, I asked you a question; "Do you fully accept everything AH says as indisputable truth?" It was framed in a question, because I did not merely 'assume' that I knew the answer. Pay attention to what's being written. Your interest in finding fault with me is muddying your vision. You're very intelligent and usually very concise in communication when you do choose to communicate....you don't beat around the bush, are very good at getting straight to the point when you deem a point worthy of making, you are wordly and well-travelled which adds a richness of depth to your over-all world view, outlook. You are good at pushing buttons and that can at times be a very positive thing for those who are interested in finding out if they have buttons that still pop. You don't devolve into mushiness or sentiment unnecessarily. You've played around with enough esoteric/spiritual bizness that you are well-rounded in your knowledge of such (astrology, LOA, self help, non-duality, etc.), You can be very funny, able to see the lighter side of things when others have difficulty, You add a certain "spiciness" to the forum that helps keep things interesting. It's so like you Reefs to use that kind of open sharing of your positive attributes to whack me over the head with it once you had a chance to first use it to massage your ego. Please keep in mind; none of those attributes counter-indicate narcissism.
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Dec 29, 2014 18:01:26 GMT -5
It's so like you Reefs to use that kind of open sharing of your positive attributes to whack me over the head with it once you had a chance to first use it to massage your ego. Please keep in mind; none of those attributes counter-indicate narcissism.
|
|