|
Post by Reefs on Jul 5, 2013 8:57:15 GMT -5
@ Tzu
Nice hat, sir.
|
|
|
Post by andrew on Jul 5, 2013 9:06:38 GMT -5
'Mind' refers to the totality. So the totality of Mind does not do seppuku, i.e. let go of Mind? When seppuku was spoken of it, we were talking about 'individual mind', not Mind. All these talks come with a presupposition of individuality and individual mind. Hence why we also create ideas like 'Mind'.
|
|
|
Post by andrew on Jul 5, 2013 9:07:33 GMT -5
What's being pointed to there is the transcending of mind, which is currently beyond your ken Which means transcending the play of ideas? No. The play of ideas is 'all that is'. Its not transcended.
|
|
|
Post by tzujanli on Jul 5, 2013 9:30:09 GMT -5
Greetings.. LOL.. Thanks, but.. my Dad was 'sir', i'm just Bob (on a good day).. other 'names' on a less good day.. Be well..
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on Jul 6, 2013 9:54:15 GMT -5
Which means transcending the play of ideas? No. The play of ideas is 'all that is'. Its not transcended. Then you've never had a realization.
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on Jul 6, 2013 9:56:31 GMT -5
So the totality of Mind does not do seppuku, i.e. let go of Mind? When seppuku was spoken of it, we were talking about 'individual mind', not Mind. All these talks come with a presupposition of individuality and individual mind. Hence why we also create ideas like 'Mind'. Oh, the delineating between capital and small letter terms again? You really are the master divvy-upper and delineator of this forum.
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on Jul 6, 2013 9:58:09 GMT -5
Greetings.. LOL.. Thanks, but.. my Dad was 'sir', i'm just Bob (on a good day).. other 'names' on a less good day.. Be well.. Well then, nice hat. And good day, Bob!
|
|
|
Post by andrew on Jul 6, 2013 10:22:24 GMT -5
No. The play of ideas is 'all that is'. Its not transcended. Then you've never had a realization. It would seem like that to you, coz you've not had the ultimate realization.
|
|
|
Post by andrew on Jul 6, 2013 10:23:02 GMT -5
When seppuku was spoken of it, we were talking about 'individual mind', not Mind. All these talks come with a presupposition of individuality and individual mind. Hence why we also create ideas like 'Mind'. Oh, the delineating between capital and small letter terms again? You really are the master divvy-upper and delineator of this forum. Again, you still don't understand what 'divvying up' refers to.
|
|
|
Post by silence on Jul 6, 2013 10:37:46 GMT -5
Then you've never had a realization. It would seem like that to you, coz you've not had the ultimate realization. Well, you've obviously never had the super duper ultimate realization * infinity!
|
|
|
Post by andrew on Jul 6, 2013 10:41:04 GMT -5
It would seem like that to you, coz you've not had the ultimate realization. Well, you've obviously never had the super duper ultimate realization * infinity! The ultimate realization is the last one by virtue of what is realized.
|
|
|
Post by silence on Jul 6, 2013 10:45:19 GMT -5
Well, you've obviously never had the super duper ultimate realization * infinity! The ultimate realization is the last one by virtue of what is realized. Heh, you really do see yourself looking back trying to help people up to where you are don't you?
|
|
|
Post by andrew on Jul 6, 2013 10:47:35 GMT -5
The ultimate realization is the last one by virtue of what is realized. Heh, you really do see yourself looking back trying to help people up to where you are don't you? I don't know who you mean by people but I really don't give a sh/t where you are at.
|
|
|
Post by silence on Jul 6, 2013 10:53:36 GMT -5
Heh, you really do see yourself looking back trying to help people up to where you are don't you? I don't know who you mean by people but I really don't give a sh/t where you are at. Haha, okay.
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on Jul 6, 2013 11:10:48 GMT -5
Then you've never had a realization. It would seem like that to you, coz you've not had the ultimate realization conclusion.
|
|