bruppy
Junior Member
Posts: 71
|
Post by bruppy on Jan 21, 2011 12:15:06 GMT -5
I feel he set traps, and made alot of money and a non guru status.
|
|
bruppy
Junior Member
Posts: 71
|
Post by bruppy on Jan 26, 2011 10:15:04 GMT -5
I also felt he said some cool things, and yet I have read, and it seems many people have read, studied, and keep on studying and nothing ever really changes for them. I have noticed that it is when people actually let go of the so called teachings, etc, that they start exploring for themselves, rather than exploring his explorations. That was his point, or so he said, but he kept on talking, kept on, IMO, setting up the situation where people would want to keep 0n listening to him, rather than looking into themselves. Hence the trap terminology of the first post by myself.
|
|
|
|
Post by m on Jan 26, 2011 13:25:09 GMT -5
I also felt he said some cool things, and yet I have read, and it seems many people have read, studied, and keep on studying and nothing ever really changes for them. I have noticed that it is when people actually let go of the so called teachings, etc, that they start exploring for themselves, rather than exploring his explorations. That was his point, or so he said, but he kept on talking, kept on, IMO, setting up the situation where people would want to keep 0n listening to him, rather than looking into themselves. Hence the trap terminology of the first post by myself. yes. this what I call the "guru paradox": the guru says : "no need any guru !" and follower answer " yes you are right! this is why you are a guru and since we listen to you we need you to warn us we dont need you"... so funny! it goes on from one krisnamurti to the next! And we can see that on still going on in "non duality show". just look at any "youtube satsang"!... .... hey don't believe me !  |
|
|
|
Post by michaelsees on Jan 26, 2011 16:28:57 GMT -5
Well the Indian guru's can be quite sneaking and JK is no exception.
Michael
|
|
|
|
Post by michaelsees on Jan 26, 2011 17:08:27 GMT -5
|
|
bruppy
Junior Member
Posts: 71
|
Post by bruppy on Jan 28, 2011 0:56:58 GMT -5
I also felt he said some cool things, and yet I have read, and it seems many people have read, studied, and keep on studying and nothing ever really changes for them. I have noticed that it is when people actually let go of the so called teachings, etc, that they start exploring for themselves, rather than exploring his explorations. That was his point, or so he said, but he kept on talking, kept on, IMO, setting up the situation where people would want to keep 0n listening to him, rather than looking into themselves. Hence the trap terminology of the first post by myself. yes. this what I call the "guru paradox": the guru says : "no need any guru !" and follower answer " yes you are right! this is why you are a guru and since we listen to you we need you to warn us we dont need you"... so funny! it goes on from one krisnamurti to the next! And we can see that on still going on in "non duality show". just look at any "youtube satsang"!... .... hey don't believe me ! I am not sure if I am right though, but sort of do for me. I gave my opinion. Thats all I can do, in spite of Krishnamurti, continuously stating, ONLY FOOLS GIVE OPINIONS. and as if such a comment is not. (please insert rolled eyes here) |
|
