|
Post by andrew on Dec 9, 2013 8:54:43 GMT -5
Yes mod. Saying you were deceitful over there would or should have got me banned? Well not for saying it to me anyway , and in this context you certainly didn't lash out on an unprovoked basis, but just watch the pattern of getting frustrated and then negatively characterizing the one you're corresponding with rather than addressing what was written to you. The old rules made that distinction between picking at the content and the pattern of content of the individual on one hand and just lunging at the individual on the other. I think I know the lines, and I don't think I crossed one, though I understand the appropriateness of moving it over here. If you think I did cross a line, then tell me.
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Dec 9, 2013 8:59:33 GMT -5
Well not for saying it to me anyway , and in this context you certainly didn't lash out on an unprovoked basis, but just watch the pattern of getting frustrated and then negatively characterizing the one you're corresponding with rather than addressing what was written to you. The old rules made that distinction between picking at the content and the pattern of content of the individual on one hand and just lunging at the individual on the other. I think I know the lines, and I don't think I crossed one, though I understand the appropriateness of moving it over here. If you think I did cross a line, then tell me. Already did.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 9, 2013 9:01:58 GMT -5
Yes mod. Saying you were deceitful over there would or should have got me banned? Well not for saying it to me anyway , and in this context you certainly didn't lash out on an unprovoked basis, but just watch the pattern of getting frustrated and then negatively characterizing the one you're corresponding with rather than addressing what was written to you. The old rules made that distinction between picking at the content and the pattern of content of the individual on one hand and just lunging at the individual on the other.The highlighted blue text is baloney.
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Dec 9, 2013 9:02:50 GMT -5
Well not for saying it to me anyway , and in this context you certainly didn't lash out on an unprovoked basis, but just watch the pattern of getting frustrated and then negatively characterizing the one you're corresponding with rather than addressing what was written to you. The old rules made that distinction between picking at the content and the pattern of content of the individual on one hand and just lunging at the individual on the other.The highlighted blue text is baloney. Good morning Art.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 9, 2013 9:11:05 GMT -5
The highlighted blue text is baloney. Good morning Art. It is, indeed, a good morning, Bill. Absolutely beautiful snowfall last night. Good morning to you. When I read what I highlighted in blue text, I found myself wishing for a nice loaf of Jewish rye to put that baloney on. I do see the point your making in the highlight, but it missed the mark. There were always one or two who evaded the sentencing.
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Dec 9, 2013 9:14:48 GMT -5
Good morning Art. It is, indeed, a good morning, Bill. Absolutely beautiful snowfall last night. Good morning to you. When I read what I highlighted in blue text, I found myself wishing for a nice loaf of Jewish rye to put that baloney on. I do see the point your making in the highlight, but it missed the mark. There were always one or two who evaded the sentencing. Well I'm always willing to let bygones be bygones my friend. If you see a case of new content where you believe the old rules would have been enforced then please feel free to either PM me or start a conversation about it over here in the free speech zone.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 9, 2013 9:22:37 GMT -5
same as it ever was, recursive if you may ...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 9, 2013 9:25:22 GMT -5
It is, indeed, a good morning, Bill. Absolutely beautiful snowfall last night. Good morning to you. When I read what I highlighted in blue text, I found myself wishing for a nice loaf of Jewish rye to put that baloney on. I do see the point your making in the highlight, but it missed the mark. There were always one or two who evaded the sentencing. Well I'm always willing to let bygones be bygones my friend. If you see a case of new content where you believe the old rules would have been enforced then please feel free to either PM me or start a conversation about it over here in the free speech zone. I'm always willing to let bygones be bygones, too. In fact, I took a few months off from here to do just that. I'm just pointing out an inconsistency in what you've posted. We're all exploring the territory of boundlessness. To single one out to be made an example of within the framework of your model, and look the other way when others smash through the boundaries of said model is beneath your dignity. I'm just looking for a little consistency here.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 9, 2013 9:28:38 GMT -5
same as it ever was, recursive if you may ... False idealism?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 9, 2013 9:33:17 GMT -5
same as it ever was, recursive if you may ... False idealism? I dunno. maybe you have. what did you read into it?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 9, 2013 9:44:32 GMT -5
False idealism? I dunno. maybe you have. what did you read into it? I didn't have to read anything into it. I was watching some kind of avant garde play unfold, and then you walk onstage, change the props to a Vatican-like setting, and start singing- Hello Dolly. When is the intermission? I need a beverage...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 9, 2013 9:50:16 GMT -5
I dunno. maybe you have. what did you read into it? I didn't have to read anything into it. I was watching some kind of avant garde play unfold, and then you walk onstage, change the props to a Vatican-like setting, and start singing- Hello Dolly. When is the intermission? I need a beverage... I'm not exactly sure what that means .. but I enjoyed reading it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 9, 2013 9:52:52 GMT -5
I didn't have to read anything into it. I was watching some kind of avant garde play unfold, and then you walk onstage, change the props to a Vatican-like setting, and start singing- Hello Dolly. When is the intermission? I need a beverage... I'm not exactly sure what that means .. but I enjoyed reading it. I enjoyed writing it. Oh crap...here come the county snowplow. Must be intermission...
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Dec 9, 2013 23:17:03 GMT -5
same as it ever was, recursive if you may ...
|
|
|
Post by laughter on Dec 9, 2013 23:19:27 GMT -5
Well I'm always willing to let bygones be bygones my friend. If you see a case of new content where you believe the old rules would have been enforced then please feel free to either PM me or start a conversation about it over here in the free speech zone. I'm always willing to let bygones be bygones, too. In fact, I took a few months off from here to do just that. I'm just pointing out an inconsistency in what you've posted. We're all exploring the territory of boundlessness. To single one out to be made an example of within the framework of your model, and look the other way when others smash through the boundaries of said model is beneath your dignity. I'm just looking for a little consistency here. If and when the circumstances arise to point up the consistency in a position, then we'll do that.
|
|