|
Post by Beingist on Aug 25, 2013 11:45:10 GMT -5
Naw, I'm just jerkin' yer chain. You've been mindf*cking? Naw, I'm just jerkin' yer chain.
|
|
|
Post by silver on Aug 25, 2013 11:48:22 GMT -5
You've been mindf*cking? Naw, I'm just jerkin' yer chain. Looks like tit for tat, all over again.
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Aug 25, 2013 11:49:32 GMT -5
You've been mindf*cking? Naw, I'm just jerkin' yer chain. Considering your aversion to mindf*ckers, I'm surprised. I guess it goes back to the idea that we become what we struggle against.
|
|
|
Post by Beingist on Aug 25, 2013 11:51:33 GMT -5
Naw, I'm just jerkin' yer chain. Looks like tit for tat, all over again. The difference is that I'm willing to say when I'm just jerkin' their chain.
|
|
|
Post by Beingist on Aug 25, 2013 11:53:20 GMT -5
Naw, I'm just jerkin' yer chain. Considering your aversion to mindf*ckers, I'm surprised. I guess it goes back to the idea that we become what we struggle against. Hmm. Yeah, okay. Can't disagree. I think it was Jung who said that one's aversion is directly proportional to one's attraction. Or something like that.
|
|
|
Post by Reefs on Aug 25, 2013 12:24:35 GMT -5
I'd say Gengst is just playing silly. Maybe he's just testing different sets of online personas like Steve does. Naw, I'm just jerkin' yer chain.
|
|
|
Post by Beingist on Aug 25, 2013 12:26:56 GMT -5
Naw, I'm just jerkin' yer chain. Same to you.
|
|
|
Post by freejoy on Aug 25, 2013 12:31:03 GMT -5
Considering your aversion to mindf*ckers, I'm surprised. I guess it goes back to the idea that we become what we struggle against. Hmm. Yeah, okay. Can't disagree. I think it was Jung who said that one's aversion is directly proportional to one's attraction. Or something like that. I'm adverse to eating sh!t, but I'm working on it.
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Aug 25, 2013 13:50:37 GMT -5
Looks like tit for tat, all over again. The difference is that I'm willing to say when I'm just jerkin' their chain. The difference is I don't jerk chains.
|
|
|
Post by silver on Aug 25, 2013 13:55:16 GMT -5
The difference is that I'm willing to say when I'm just jerkin' their chain. The difference is I don't jerk chains. You have to admit, you have that effect sometimes. It's a reflection on nobody.
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Aug 25, 2013 14:03:32 GMT -5
The difference is I don't jerk chains. You have to admit, you have that effect sometimes. It's a reflection on nobody. I see that I have the effect of stimulating resistance, but it's not done for my own entertainment. I don't enjoy the negativity.
|
|
|
Post by silver on Aug 25, 2013 14:17:53 GMT -5
You have to admit, you have that effect sometimes. It's a reflection on nobody. I see that I have the effect of stimulating resistance, but it's not done for my own entertainment. I don't enjoy the negativity. Could you explain in a nuthell what is the purpose for stimulating resistance? My apologies if I've asked this before.
|
|
|
Post by Beingist on Aug 25, 2013 14:22:32 GMT -5
You have to admit, you have that effect sometimes. It's a reflection on nobody. I see that I have the effect of stimulating resistance, but it's not done for my own entertainment. I don't enjoy the negativity. Load o' crap, here. Like hell you don't jerk chains. Mocking is your forte, and mocking is jerking chains. And if you don't enjoy the negativity, then quit jerking chains. You can start by recanting your belief that I am Mr. G. You know I'm not.
|
|
|
Post by silver on Aug 25, 2013 14:31:53 GMT -5
I see that I have the effect of stimulating resistance, but it's not done for my own entertainment. I don't enjoy the negativity. Load o' crap, here. Like hell you don't jerk chains. Mocking is your forte, and mocking is jerking chains. And if you don't enjoy the negativity, then quit jerking chains. You can start by recanting your belief that I am Mr. G. You know I'm not. I have to agree with you as far as his mocking is concerned. We've all been witness to that. Um, I think that he/they were just joking about you being Mr. G. There's a difference between having an open mind and being a little naive. Been there, done that. edited to say that the joking (you being Mr. G) had a 'touch' of that mocking quality to it...
|
|
|
Post by Beingist on Aug 25, 2013 14:42:55 GMT -5
Load o' crap, here. Like hell you don't jerk chains. Mocking is your forte, and mocking is jerking chains. And if you don't enjoy the negativity, then quit jerking chains. You can start by recanting your belief that I am Mr. G. You know I'm not. I have to agree with you as far as his mocking is concerned. We've all been witness to that. Um, I think that he/they were just joking about you being Mr. G. There's a difference between having an open mind and being a little naive. Been there, done that. Yes, I know they were joking about me being Mr. G. I joked back by playing along. Mutual chain jerking. And, I'm cool with that. What I'm not cool with is the hypocrisy it takes for a chain-jerker to say "I don't jerk chains", while simultaneously chanting how much he values sincerity. Because I'm not cool with it, he (and Reefs) call me 'Bengst bear', replete with the 'must be that time of the month' thing (which, btw, I've always thought was a sexist remark). I'm actually okay with that, as well, and so I play along with that, too. Again, more mutual chain-jerking. Now, he adds, 'and I don't enjoy the negativity', which is playing the victim card. Seriously, he's the 'Wedgie Kid'. Which, again, no problem with it, per se, just the lack of willingness on his part to admit it.
|
|