|
|
Post by silver on Jul 20, 2013 16:02:53 GMT -5
Those two make an interesting couple, yes. It actually HAS been interesting to watch what happens with Top's approach. Maybe as he gets progressively more frustrated with Silver, his approach starts to look more like ours?  Just maybe if he weren't taking his pointers from you two, on how to instruct, he wouldn't be in this mess. I think far more can be taught more efficiently from the standpoint of learning from each other as friends. |
|
|
|
Post by silence on Jul 20, 2013 16:05:16 GMT -5
It only appears as if there is 'one' that is interested or not interested in things. When the illusion of this 'one' has been seen through, it matters not what these apparent 'ones' seem to be interested or not interested in. Hehehe. What in blazes are you talking about? The funniest part is that Andrew "liked" your reply. |
|
|
|
Post by Beingist on Jul 20, 2013 16:11:04 GMT -5
What in blazes are you talking about? The funniest part is that Andrew "liked" your reply. Mindf*cker, I'm tellin' ya. |
|
|
|
Post by andrew on Jul 20, 2013 16:17:21 GMT -5
The funniest part is that Andrew "liked" your reply. Mindf*cker, I'm tellin' ya. you've just been in a mood lately coz I pointed out that 'Being' is conceptual. Its why you keep insisting that I see everything as 'Mind' despite my saying several times that 'Mind' is also just another pointer. |
|
|
|
Post by silence on Jul 20, 2013 16:18:16 GMT -5
No. The tools do what they say on the tin. You mean like go from a raging needy lover that demands 100 things before he shows love to someone who only demands a few things? Yes, I suppose that's possible. |
|
|
|
Post by silence on Jul 20, 2013 16:20:14 GMT -5
Most of this conversation I'm just left wondering where the church of nonduality is and where I get the handbook. I t's been objectified into oblivion.mwahahahahaha Yes Andrew, I had to provide some literal humor for you. |
|
|
|
Post by silence on Jul 20, 2013 16:22:08 GMT -5
Those two make an interesting couple, yes. It actually HAS been interesting to watch what happens with Top's approach. Maybe as he gets progressively more frustrated with Silver, his approach starts to look more like ours? I'm just waiting until I turn on the TV and see Dr.Top day time talk show. |
|
|
|
Post by andrew on Jul 20, 2013 16:22:53 GMT -5
No. The tools do what they say on the tin. You mean like go from a raging needy lover that demands 100 things before he shows love to someone who only demands a few things? Yes, I suppose that's possible. If someone went from being raging and needy to more understanding, accepting, compassionate and perceptive.... that would be a good thing. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 20, 2013 16:24:17 GMT -5
No. The tools do what they say on the tin. You mean like go from a raging needy lover that demands 100 things before he shows love to someone who only demands a few things? Yes, I suppose that's possible. "Needy Lover"....where did that come from Silence?.....oh no....you having 'needy lover' trouble?....maybe even constipated, 'needy lover' problems? That can get serious.   |
|
|
|
Post by silence on Jul 20, 2013 16:24:39 GMT -5
People get stuck in their interpretations. There isn't any non-duality to get stuck in. By non-duality I mean the body of thought/pointers Okay, sure. Most everyone gets stuck riding the pointers around rather than looking. |
|
|
|
Post by andrew on Jul 20, 2013 16:25:28 GMT -5
You mean like go from a raging needy lover that demands 100 things before he shows love to someone who only demands a few things? Yes, I suppose that's possible. "Needy Lover"....where did that come from Silence?.....oh no....you having 'needy lover' trouble?....maybe even constipated, 'needy lover' problems? That can get serious.  |
|
|
|
Post by silence on Jul 20, 2013 16:26:58 GMT -5
The funniest part is that Andrew "liked" your reply. Mindf*cker, I'm tellin' ya. Heh, I reckon Andrew gets a little enjoyment out of seeing Enigma confused. |
|
|
|
Post by andrew on Jul 20, 2013 16:28:30 GMT -5
By non-duality I mean the body of thought/pointers Okay, sure. Most everyone gets stuck riding the pointers around rather than looking. Its exactly that whole looking business where people get stuck. There's a shed load of people out there looking, looking, looking coz some non-dual idiot has suggested that if they look in the right way or the right place or the right time that something magic will happen. That whole looking thing is a crock. of. sh/t. Wotcha got to say to that then Silence? |
|
|
|
Post by silver on Jul 20, 2013 16:31:06 GMT -5
You mean like go from a raging needy lover that demands 100 things before he shows love to someone who only demands a few things? Yes, I suppose that's possible. "Needy Lover"....where did that come from Silence?.....oh no....you having 'needy lover' trouble?....maybe even constipated, 'needy lover' problems? That can get serious. Where's the canned laughter when you need it...........No, not you, Bill...........hahahahaha |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 20, 2013 16:34:12 GMT -5
You mean like go from a raging needy lover that demands 100 things before he shows love to someone who only demands a few things? Yes, I suppose that's possible. "Needy Lover"....where did that come from Silence?.....oh no....you having 'needy lover' trouble?....maybe even constipated, 'needy lover' problems? That can get serious. Baking soda ain't gonna help that, by golly! |
|
