|
|
Post by Reefs on Mar 17, 2021 0:05:53 GMT -5
Loosely related Seth searches: If everything is consciousness, then even energy is a camouflage. What is, where does it come from, the "energy" that powers everything in our dreams? All depends on where you draw the line: what camouflage, with what root assumptions, you postulate as reality. What others call ether or energy or Qi/Ki (or as ZD suggested, the holy spirit), Seth calls vitality. And what we call the material world, or manifested or physical reality, Seth calls 'solidified vitality'. I think that's a brilliant choice of words by Seth/Jane. |
|
|
|
Post by zazeniac on Mar 17, 2021 10:45:18 GMT -5
I understand. I meant to be humorous, intending to ridicule those who use "scientific consensus" (as objected by Crichton) as an argument. I think ridicule is on the lower rung of the humor tree What a foolish thing to say! Heaping on the ridicule! 😁 Crichton's argument is flawed. Yes there have been outliers who were ridiculed initially by their peers, Darwin, Newton, and others. But eventually, the weight of the experimental data and the math swung the consensus in their direction and it was never the science naysayers who tipped the scales back in the direction of truth. |
|
|
|
Post by zazeniac on Mar 17, 2021 10:48:08 GMT -5
Storage is the bugaboo, not lack of "free" energy sources. Can't put sunshine, wind or tides in tanks.
|
|
|
|
Post by Peter on Mar 18, 2021 4:31:34 GMT -5
Storage is the bugaboo, not lack of "free" energy sources. Can't put sunshine, wind or tides in tanks. batteries is what I'm hearing  If you use spare electricity to pump water back up into a hydro-electric reservoir then yes you could literally put energy into a tank. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pumped-storage_hydroelectricity |
|
|
|
Post by zazeniac on Mar 18, 2021 8:41:42 GMT -5
Flywheels are interesting too. |
|
