Post by Reefs on Mar 15, 2021 13:22:11 GMT -5
This is a documentary from the mid 90s, but still as relevant as ever. The interesting thing for me was that these scientists and inventors found out what Seth had been teaching all along, that there are no closed systems. And this seems to be the key to everything in physics.
For those who don't have the time to watch this 2h video, I've got the most important parts in writing:
Narrator: “One thing is certain, if we continue on the course of rapidly burning fossil fuels and relying on nuclear fission, the future of our civilization is in grave jeopardy. We're at a critical juncture… our finite reserves of oil and gas will be completely exhausted by the year 2025 at the present [1997] rate of consumption” (** facepalm **)
“Most people would agree you can't get something for nothing. There's no such thing as a free lunch. And yet we get our oxygen free from the air we breathe, we get sunlight free, and water that used to be free until bottled drinking water came along. But what about energy we've always had to pay for, that - whether it's wood or coal, oil or electricity - it's always been the rule that you can never get back more energy than what you put in the first place. That's a fundamental law of nature. Physicists of the 19th century figured that out with the first law of thermodynamics, the conservation of energy. Maybe so, but science has come a long way since then - and laws, well there's never been one that hasn't been broken.”
Moray King (author): “Most of our scientific community actually believes that empty space, the nature of space itself, is completely empty, devoid of anything. And historically it's very interesting, because in the 1800s and even earlier they believed there was an ether, an all-pervading substance, filling up space. And in 1905 when relativity theory became very popular, they said, well we don't need to see through, it's completely empty, space is empty. Then twenty years later in 1925, when quantum mechanics comes into play, all of a sudden a new energy appears in equations of quantum mechanics. And it has to be there to make the equations work. And it has to do with fluctuations of electromagnetic field energy at a very high frequency that interacts with everything, and they called this the zero-point energy. It turns out that all the elementary particles interact with this energy, and it becomes a potential energy source - that's what we're discovering today.”
Brian O’Leary (physicist): “Free energy is basically another word for zero-point energy. It's the energy that is contained within the vacuum of space, and which is virtually undetectable by any traditional means. In fact, the energy is homogeneous and isotropic, the same everywhere, the same in all directions. And because of that, trying to extract it or measure it, it's sort of like the problem of trying to weigh a beaker of water underneath the surface of the ocean - what do you measure with respect to what? That’s been the physicists dilemma. And we've gone down one very large cul-de-sac this century, the cul-de-sac meaning that there is no such thing as consciousness, there is no such thing as this zero-point field or this place from which the energy can come. And the answer now appears to be, yes. Because theoretical physics and a number of experiments and quantum mechanics show very clearly the existence of this all pervasive electromagnetic field called the zero-point field”
Narrator: “Although skeptics often point to Einstein's theory of relativity, it was Einstein who in 1920 said: “There is a weighty argument to be adduced in favor of the ether hypothesis. To deny the ether is ultimately to assume that empty space has no physical qualities whatever. The fundamental facts of mechanics do not harmonize with this view. According to the general theory of relativity, space is endowed with physical qualities; in this sense, therefore, there exists an ether. According to the general theory of relativity, space without ether is unthinkable”
Tom Bearden (nuclear engineer): “[By vacuum] we are talking about empty space-time. It turns out that in the modern view, modern quantum mechanical view, if you apply that knowledge that's been gained there, what you find is that the vacuum is fiercely active. It's a fierce energy flux and going all directions at all times. The energy density of that, as estimated by various physicists, is extremely high; for example, in one cubic centimeter if you could take the raw energy in that cubic centimeter and condensed it into mass divided by c squared, you would have more observable mass result from that then our largest telescope can see in the observable universe and all the stars and planets today. And so the energy that's there is extremely dense and extremely fierce. This drives everything that we call physical reality, from the quantum level right on up to the observed level in the observed world that we live in. Everything is energetically driven by the vacuum.”
Narrator: “As with many other promising inventions developed during the Cold War years, the National Secrecy Act prevented scientists like Townsend Brown from commercializing or even publicizing it, any technology which could potentially be interpreted as having a military application… “
“The triumph of America's space exploration program gave way to the era of limits in the late 70s. The infamous energy crisis made us all aware of our dependence on finite resources. Many adventures promised dramatic results with devices they said would solve the crisis; claims of over-unity, where power output exceeds input, were routinely announced. But when put to the test, most of their crude prototypes performed poorly or not at all. Measuring methods were and still are extremely difficult to perform accurately. A few that did achieve modest gains and output, were dismissed by mainstream academia and denied patents. And without patent protection, investors have no financial incentive to lay out the millions of dollars it takes to mass-produce and market these devices, no matter how promising the technology.“
“And after, all classical Newtonian dynamics got us to the Moon and Einstein's E = mc2 explained that energy could neither be created nor destroyed, anything else which seemed otherwise was labeled perpetual motion unworthy a scientific examination “
Tom Bearden (nuclear engineer): “Most of the scientists equated any notion of a free energy or over-unity device as being a perpetual motion machine, and therefore utter nonsense. You see, it's a play on words, the scientists interpreted it one way, the guys trying to do it are looking at it as an open system. Now, fortunately today, we have a type of thermodynamics - you know, Nobel Prizes have been issued for it - for systems not in thermodynamic equilibrium that do have their open systems, and the energy does flow in from outside and through them. Those kinds of systems can produce over-unity. It's all perfectly legitimate physics.”
“The paddle wheel in the river that's used to power a mill grind corn is a free energy device, so is a windmill for example. What we mean is, we are taking the energy from an external source and using it. So it's an open system. And the environment of the system is furnishing a flow of energy into the system, which the system is then collecting and using. Primary requirements, it has to be an open system, it has to have an external source of energy to furnish the energy that we're going to use. And therefore it's no more mysterious than a windmill.”
Brian O’Leary (physicist): “And now we're coming full circle and realizing that physics and metaphysics, that some of the notions of the 19th century, such as the ether and the vortex, are now being dusted off. And those ideas are being melded with modern experiments plus quantum mechanics and so forth into this magnificent synthesis of what I call sacred science, of a whole new science, a whole new physics in which consciousness remains or reigns supreme and where we don't have to follow any particular guru or a leader or anything like that; that we have everything we need in the universe, it's ours to have right now. And these are some of the basic essence principles that lie underneath the discovery of free energy.”
Narrator: “In 1989 two physicists from the University of Utah, Dr. Stanley Pons and Dr. Martin Fleischmann, created a media frenzy with their announcement of cold fusion in a bottle. Although several independent experiments reported similar test results, the cry of fraud quickly went up at MIT and other prestigious universities – the debunking swift and merciless.“
Eugene Mallove (editor and publisher): “Throughout the history of science, anytime there is something that is very threatening to the established ideas, such as Galileo's revelations through the telescope and his idea of following on others that the earth goes around the Sun, not vice-versa, continental drift, all sorts of claims that ultimately became validated; the initial reaction of science is to say, this is nonsense and to reject it and not even to look at the data. And I would say that the cold fusion and free energy or new energy phenomena are so threatening to the underpinnings of modern physics and chemistry and all other sciences, that you would get the expected intensely negative reaction.”
“The real story about cold fusion is that it never died. Soon after the announcement in Utah, on March 23rd 1989, thousands of people all over the world, scientists and engineers, began to try to replicate the Pons and Fleischmann experiment, and positive results kept coming in, of all manner, including the energy, the excess energy, far more out than in than could be possibly explained by any chemical reaction or any previously stored energy. The unfortunate situation was that the U.S. Department of Energy masterminded a bogus panel of so-called experts, many of whom were biased from the start against the subject. They came up with the expected answer within only three months and they ratified it within six months, even as the evidence continued.”
“Another area that has emerged as a result of cold fusion which is every bit as heretical and disastrous to the scientific enterprise as the over-unity and the greater energy out than in, is the transmutation of metals, that is heavy metals. In ordinary cold fusion experiments they have now seen in the metal changes in elements, for example the production of copper, the production of other isotopes such as rhodium, the change of palladium into other things. This is confirmed, there's no doubt about it, and it's occurring with minimal energy input. So what this leads to is an analogy with the old claims of the alchemists, who were able, historically, they said, and there's some evidence that they were able to do it, to do low energy processes that produced gold from lead, or mercury or other things. This is now being done in laboratories. And every instance I know of in the history of science, where a small effect was seen, initially, to produce something, was later scaled up. So it's quite possible that our culture will enter an age of alchemy in which low energy processes can make precious metals.”
Hal Fox (editor): “As we look toward the future, I believe we'll be able to find ways in which we can create the kind of elements that we need by these low energy nuclear reactions. I think we'll be able to start adding to, or picking apart or changing the nucleus of atoms, to be able to give the kind of stable atoms that we need. But more important, I thoroughly believe that we will be able to take the radioactive materials, add a proton or add some changes to it and make those radioactive materials non radioactive. And that is going to be a great boon to our present, to clean up the mess that we left behind from our atomic bombs, from our nuclear power plants and of course from things like Chernobyl. So in the future, we have laid the groundwork with cold fusion. by which we'll be able to handle a whole array of nuclear changes that heretofore have been outside of the current model of what can be done with nuclear reactions.”
Shiuji Inomata (MIT scientist, psychotronics): “To understand this machine [inomata n-machine] you need a mind change, a paradigm shift in yourself. So far physics, ordinary science considers only the material world. But we should seek another world, the unseen world. And we should recognize that the unseen world and the material world are connected. This energy comes from the other dimension.”
For those who don't have the time to watch this 2h video, I've got the most important parts in writing:
Narrator: “One thing is certain, if we continue on the course of rapidly burning fossil fuels and relying on nuclear fission, the future of our civilization is in grave jeopardy. We're at a critical juncture… our finite reserves of oil and gas will be completely exhausted by the year 2025 at the present [1997] rate of consumption” (** facepalm **)
“Most people would agree you can't get something for nothing. There's no such thing as a free lunch. And yet we get our oxygen free from the air we breathe, we get sunlight free, and water that used to be free until bottled drinking water came along. But what about energy we've always had to pay for, that - whether it's wood or coal, oil or electricity - it's always been the rule that you can never get back more energy than what you put in the first place. That's a fundamental law of nature. Physicists of the 19th century figured that out with the first law of thermodynamics, the conservation of energy. Maybe so, but science has come a long way since then - and laws, well there's never been one that hasn't been broken.”
Moray King (author): “Most of our scientific community actually believes that empty space, the nature of space itself, is completely empty, devoid of anything. And historically it's very interesting, because in the 1800s and even earlier they believed there was an ether, an all-pervading substance, filling up space. And in 1905 when relativity theory became very popular, they said, well we don't need to see through, it's completely empty, space is empty. Then twenty years later in 1925, when quantum mechanics comes into play, all of a sudden a new energy appears in equations of quantum mechanics. And it has to be there to make the equations work. And it has to do with fluctuations of electromagnetic field energy at a very high frequency that interacts with everything, and they called this the zero-point energy. It turns out that all the elementary particles interact with this energy, and it becomes a potential energy source - that's what we're discovering today.”
Brian O’Leary (physicist): “Free energy is basically another word for zero-point energy. It's the energy that is contained within the vacuum of space, and which is virtually undetectable by any traditional means. In fact, the energy is homogeneous and isotropic, the same everywhere, the same in all directions. And because of that, trying to extract it or measure it, it's sort of like the problem of trying to weigh a beaker of water underneath the surface of the ocean - what do you measure with respect to what? That’s been the physicists dilemma. And we've gone down one very large cul-de-sac this century, the cul-de-sac meaning that there is no such thing as consciousness, there is no such thing as this zero-point field or this place from which the energy can come. And the answer now appears to be, yes. Because theoretical physics and a number of experiments and quantum mechanics show very clearly the existence of this all pervasive electromagnetic field called the zero-point field”
Narrator: “Although skeptics often point to Einstein's theory of relativity, it was Einstein who in 1920 said: “There is a weighty argument to be adduced in favor of the ether hypothesis. To deny the ether is ultimately to assume that empty space has no physical qualities whatever. The fundamental facts of mechanics do not harmonize with this view. According to the general theory of relativity, space is endowed with physical qualities; in this sense, therefore, there exists an ether. According to the general theory of relativity, space without ether is unthinkable”
Tom Bearden (nuclear engineer): “[By vacuum] we are talking about empty space-time. It turns out that in the modern view, modern quantum mechanical view, if you apply that knowledge that's been gained there, what you find is that the vacuum is fiercely active. It's a fierce energy flux and going all directions at all times. The energy density of that, as estimated by various physicists, is extremely high; for example, in one cubic centimeter if you could take the raw energy in that cubic centimeter and condensed it into mass divided by c squared, you would have more observable mass result from that then our largest telescope can see in the observable universe and all the stars and planets today. And so the energy that's there is extremely dense and extremely fierce. This drives everything that we call physical reality, from the quantum level right on up to the observed level in the observed world that we live in. Everything is energetically driven by the vacuum.”
Narrator: “As with many other promising inventions developed during the Cold War years, the National Secrecy Act prevented scientists like Townsend Brown from commercializing or even publicizing it, any technology which could potentially be interpreted as having a military application… “
“The triumph of America's space exploration program gave way to the era of limits in the late 70s. The infamous energy crisis made us all aware of our dependence on finite resources. Many adventures promised dramatic results with devices they said would solve the crisis; claims of over-unity, where power output exceeds input, were routinely announced. But when put to the test, most of their crude prototypes performed poorly or not at all. Measuring methods were and still are extremely difficult to perform accurately. A few that did achieve modest gains and output, were dismissed by mainstream academia and denied patents. And without patent protection, investors have no financial incentive to lay out the millions of dollars it takes to mass-produce and market these devices, no matter how promising the technology.“
“And after, all classical Newtonian dynamics got us to the Moon and Einstein's E = mc2 explained that energy could neither be created nor destroyed, anything else which seemed otherwise was labeled perpetual motion unworthy a scientific examination “
Tom Bearden (nuclear engineer): “Most of the scientists equated any notion of a free energy or over-unity device as being a perpetual motion machine, and therefore utter nonsense. You see, it's a play on words, the scientists interpreted it one way, the guys trying to do it are looking at it as an open system. Now, fortunately today, we have a type of thermodynamics - you know, Nobel Prizes have been issued for it - for systems not in thermodynamic equilibrium that do have their open systems, and the energy does flow in from outside and through them. Those kinds of systems can produce over-unity. It's all perfectly legitimate physics.”
“The paddle wheel in the river that's used to power a mill grind corn is a free energy device, so is a windmill for example. What we mean is, we are taking the energy from an external source and using it. So it's an open system. And the environment of the system is furnishing a flow of energy into the system, which the system is then collecting and using. Primary requirements, it has to be an open system, it has to have an external source of energy to furnish the energy that we're going to use. And therefore it's no more mysterious than a windmill.”
Brian O’Leary (physicist): “And now we're coming full circle and realizing that physics and metaphysics, that some of the notions of the 19th century, such as the ether and the vortex, are now being dusted off. And those ideas are being melded with modern experiments plus quantum mechanics and so forth into this magnificent synthesis of what I call sacred science, of a whole new science, a whole new physics in which consciousness remains or reigns supreme and where we don't have to follow any particular guru or a leader or anything like that; that we have everything we need in the universe, it's ours to have right now. And these are some of the basic essence principles that lie underneath the discovery of free energy.”
Narrator: “In 1989 two physicists from the University of Utah, Dr. Stanley Pons and Dr. Martin Fleischmann, created a media frenzy with their announcement of cold fusion in a bottle. Although several independent experiments reported similar test results, the cry of fraud quickly went up at MIT and other prestigious universities – the debunking swift and merciless.“
Eugene Mallove (editor and publisher): “Throughout the history of science, anytime there is something that is very threatening to the established ideas, such as Galileo's revelations through the telescope and his idea of following on others that the earth goes around the Sun, not vice-versa, continental drift, all sorts of claims that ultimately became validated; the initial reaction of science is to say, this is nonsense and to reject it and not even to look at the data. And I would say that the cold fusion and free energy or new energy phenomena are so threatening to the underpinnings of modern physics and chemistry and all other sciences, that you would get the expected intensely negative reaction.”
“The real story about cold fusion is that it never died. Soon after the announcement in Utah, on March 23rd 1989, thousands of people all over the world, scientists and engineers, began to try to replicate the Pons and Fleischmann experiment, and positive results kept coming in, of all manner, including the energy, the excess energy, far more out than in than could be possibly explained by any chemical reaction or any previously stored energy. The unfortunate situation was that the U.S. Department of Energy masterminded a bogus panel of so-called experts, many of whom were biased from the start against the subject. They came up with the expected answer within only three months and they ratified it within six months, even as the evidence continued.”
“Another area that has emerged as a result of cold fusion which is every bit as heretical and disastrous to the scientific enterprise as the over-unity and the greater energy out than in, is the transmutation of metals, that is heavy metals. In ordinary cold fusion experiments they have now seen in the metal changes in elements, for example the production of copper, the production of other isotopes such as rhodium, the change of palladium into other things. This is confirmed, there's no doubt about it, and it's occurring with minimal energy input. So what this leads to is an analogy with the old claims of the alchemists, who were able, historically, they said, and there's some evidence that they were able to do it, to do low energy processes that produced gold from lead, or mercury or other things. This is now being done in laboratories. And every instance I know of in the history of science, where a small effect was seen, initially, to produce something, was later scaled up. So it's quite possible that our culture will enter an age of alchemy in which low energy processes can make precious metals.”
Hal Fox (editor): “As we look toward the future, I believe we'll be able to find ways in which we can create the kind of elements that we need by these low energy nuclear reactions. I think we'll be able to start adding to, or picking apart or changing the nucleus of atoms, to be able to give the kind of stable atoms that we need. But more important, I thoroughly believe that we will be able to take the radioactive materials, add a proton or add some changes to it and make those radioactive materials non radioactive. And that is going to be a great boon to our present, to clean up the mess that we left behind from our atomic bombs, from our nuclear power plants and of course from things like Chernobyl. So in the future, we have laid the groundwork with cold fusion. by which we'll be able to handle a whole array of nuclear changes that heretofore have been outside of the current model of what can be done with nuclear reactions.”
Shiuji Inomata (MIT scientist, psychotronics): “To understand this machine [inomata n-machine] you need a mind change, a paradigm shift in yourself. So far physics, ordinary science considers only the material world. But we should seek another world, the unseen world. And we should recognize that the unseen world and the material world are connected. This energy comes from the other dimension.”
