|
Post by krsnaraja on Feb 10, 2019 18:53:43 GMT -5
I is the self. Dr Melvin is ego. So, when I love you I am referring to Me loving the other self. When I say I love Dr Melvin, the self loves the ego Dr Melvin. I, self, is soul spirit residing within this body identified as Dr Melvin. It says in the commentary that nobody can know God and yet you are clearly somebody. " There's a light a certain kind of light that never shown on me I want my life to be to live with you, to live with you, there's a way to do each every little thing but what good does it bring to love somebody the way I love you ." - lyrics from the song by the Bee Gees entitled To Love Somebody
|
|
|
Post by krsnaraja on Feb 10, 2019 19:01:46 GMT -5
" There's a light a certain kind of light that never shown on me I want my life to be to live you, to live with you there's a way to do each every little thing but what good does it bring to love somebody the way I love you ." - lyrics from the song by the Bee Gees entitled To Love Somebody Are you saying that the Light has never shone on you? Maybe. Because if I tell you so that would be hypocrisy.
|
|
|
Post by krsnaraja on Feb 10, 2019 19:11:20 GMT -5
Maybe. Because if I tell you so that would be hypocrisy. Just tell your truth. Is there such as your truth? If I did that would come from ego.
|
|
|
Post by krsnaraja on Feb 10, 2019 19:38:15 GMT -5
Is there such as your truth? If I did that would come from ego. Ego is just the mind's identification with being a person. Do you think that quoting other people isn't coming from your identification with being a person? Quoting other people to make one's point of view more credible sort of a reference. But I won't without a quote referring to what I say would be hearsay. To prove something in court hearings that your defense or offense is only wishful thinking is to attach a jurisprudence coming from supreme court decisions. So when I am explaining my view should be supported from scriptures or credible sources.
|
|
|
Post by krsnaraja on Feb 10, 2019 20:04:57 GMT -5
Quoting other people to make one's point of view more credible sort of a reference. But I won't without a quote referring to what I say would be hearsay. To prove something in court hearings that your defense or offense is only wishful thinking is to attach a jurisprudence coming from supreme court decisions. So when I am explaining my view should be supported from scriptures or credible sources. In matters of God, it is deceptive to think that quoting makes one's view more credible. Scripture is always open to interpretation, and it's that interpretation that is crucial to understanding. I find the Bible difficult to interpret It made a lot easier when I use the Bhagavad Gita and Srimad Bhagavatam as reference. This is what I came to understand about God. That God is a many splendored thing. With this silent heart God taught me how to sing Yes true love a many splendored thing. That's God..
|
|
|
Post by krsnaraja on Feb 10, 2019 20:20:52 GMT -5
I find the Bible difficult to interpret It made a lot easier when I use the Bhagavad Gita and Srimad Bhagavatam as reference. This is what I came to understand about God. That God is a many splendored thing. With this silent heart God taught me how to sing Yes true love a many splendored thing. That's God.. True love is an honest expression from the 'human' form, untempered by any doubt. Don't get caught up with thinking that only that is God. Yes, of course. True love is not only God's true nature. He's naughty too. He stole the dresses of his girl friends while they were bathing in the river The dresses God hang them on the tree and let the girls climb and get them. He would toss the dresses to them if the girls one by one kiss God. Is that the way God operates?
|
|
|
Post by krsnaraja on Feb 10, 2019 20:25:03 GMT -5
Yes, of course. True love is not only God's true nature. He's naughty too. He stole the dresses of his girl friends while they were bathing in the river The dresses God hang them on the tree and let the girls climb and get them. He would toss the dresses to them if the girls one by one kiss God. Is that the way God operates? Princes do what princes do. God is not a prince. He acted as son, brother, a friend, lover and father.
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Feb 11, 2019 11:08:32 GMT -5
True love is an honest expression from the 'human' form, untempered by any doubt. Don't get caught up with thinking that only that is God. Yes, of course. True love is not only God's true nature. He's naughty too. He stole the dresses of his girl friends while they were bathing in the river The dresses God hang them on the tree and let the girls climb and get them. He would toss the dresses to them if the girls one by one kiss God. Is that the way God operates? In his perverted human expression, yes.
|
|
|
Post by enigma on Feb 11, 2019 11:11:33 GMT -5
Princes do what princes do. God is not a prince. He acted as son, brother, a friend, lover and father. He stole his daughter's dresses or his sister's dresses?
|
|
|
Post by krsnaraja on Feb 11, 2019 15:52:18 GMT -5
God is not a prince. He acted as son, brother, a friend, lover and father. He stole his daughter's dresses or his sister's dresses? His girlfriends dresses.
|
|