Larry
New Member
Posts: 26
|
Post by Larry on Feb 13, 2016 14:34:19 GMT -5
This short e-Book will investigate what a new religion might look like if it were born today (2016). We can call it Next Generation religion as it is a progression of the three major monotheistic religions that are practiced in the West, but with a greater focus on inner experience as opposed to the “word”. A requirement of a modern-day religion is to take into account that many have rejected the structure and ritual of Ancient Religion. The attitude of “spiritual but not religious” represents a large segment of those that have rejected Ancient Religion, but still feel a connection to something beyond themselves. In this modern age of computers and instant communication, a bona-fide religion needs to be both rational and relevant, and still retain that spiritual quality that many hang onto. The author has been carefully observing and reflecting on human nature over the last two decades, which has ultimately culminated into a view on human nature, and now religion, which can be easily understood. It is my hope that this short e-book will meet a real need in the world. The goal of the book is not to present an iconoclastic viewpoint in order to disrupt existing religions, but to provide a home for seekers without a clear understanding of what and how they are seeking. Read for free at NextGenerationReligion.comor buy at Amazon KindleBarnes & Noble Nook
|
|
|
Post by jay17 on Feb 13, 2016 15:06:55 GMT -5
The goal of the book is not to present an iconoclastic viewpoint in order to disrupt existing religions, but to provide a home for seekers without a clear understanding of what and how they are seeking. My interpretation is, the author has created a new philosophy that he wants or hopes it inspires this generation's seekers who lack a clear understanding of what and how they are seeking, to become their religion. Perhaps you could share this with the author... When you have that awareness that is in touch with what is real, and then you feel that writing about it is a lot of junk, it surely suggests that experience of the real is a lot more important than writing about it. All that thinking and writing about thinking has established a precedence that is hard to shake off at will. Throw out all the junk and crap, you'll travel a lot lighter that way.
|
|
Larry
New Member
Posts: 26
|
Post by Larry on Feb 13, 2016 16:28:03 GMT -5
Thanks for finding that statement from a few years ago. Fortunately, I am somewhat of a minimalist writer (I am the author) that tries to keep to the basics. It really is a conundrum that while direct experience requires no words, talking or writing about it does. It is the human condition and there's not much we can do it about it. If you want to discuss any specifics in the book, it is a free read, and I am willing to answer inquiries.
|
|
|
Post by jay17 on Feb 13, 2016 23:36:24 GMT -5
What is the conundrum that you perceive, for i don't see one?
|
|
Larry
New Member
Posts: 26
|
Post by Larry on Feb 14, 2016 9:18:43 GMT -5
The conundrum is that talking/writing about spiritual issues is a different modality than experiencing it. And we spend a lot of time talking about a modality that cannot be reached via words or thought.
|
|
|
Post by maxdprophet on Feb 14, 2016 9:22:07 GMT -5
The conundrum is that talking/writing about spiritual issues is a different modality than experiencing it. And we spend a lot of time talking about a modality that cannot be reached via words or thought. Yeah a discussion forum is doomed from the start. Just a bunch of echoing shadows in a cave.
|
|
Larry
New Member
Posts: 26
|
Post by Larry on Feb 14, 2016 11:11:06 GMT -5
Anyone coming to an internet forum to find enlightenment will surely be disappointed. However, I think most people have an inner life apart from the social connections on the internet. A like-minded online group with affection between members can be very helpful to those struggling with spiritual issues.
|
|
|
Post by jay17 on Feb 15, 2016 12:39:41 GMT -5
The conundrum is that talking/writing about spiritual issues is a different modality than experiencing it. And we spend a lot of time talking about a modality that cannot be reached via words or thought. How can it be a conundrum if you are aware they are different actions that produce different results? Who are these people that spend a lot of time talking? Do you have a guideline that informs others of how much talking is okay and what is too much? Cannot a human directly experience talking, writing, listening, reading?
|
|
|
Post by hicksetta on Feb 15, 2016 14:37:06 GMT -5
Offering a book for free for all to read, I can't see anything wrong with it at all. Offering free books online actually is a very nice gift. Thanks for offering, Anonji.
|
|
Larry
New Member
Posts: 26
|
Post by Larry on Feb 15, 2016 14:51:23 GMT -5
Offering a book for free for all to read, I can't see anything wrong with it at all. Offering free books online actually is a very nice gift. Thanks for offering, Anonji. Thank you for the kind words.
|
|
|
Post by hicksetta on Feb 15, 2016 14:56:19 GMT -5
De nada, Anonji, it's my pleasure and my duty. I'm not through with your book yet. If you want me to, I can tell you what I think about it, when I'm done reading it.
|
|
Larry
New Member
Posts: 26
|
Post by Larry on Feb 15, 2016 15:09:26 GMT -5
The conundrum is that talking/writing about spiritual issues is a different modality than experiencing it. And we spend a lot of time talking about a modality that cannot be reached via words or thought. How can it be a conundrum if you are aware they are different actions that produce different results? Jay, My style of writing is based on observation over a long period of time. I tend to use We when I notice a trend that is widespread in the world. My generalization may not apply to you (only you would know that). If you are aware of the duality I am referencing and are not caught in it, it is admirable. Who are these people that spend a lot of time talking? My observation is that most of the world is trapped in the constructed, virtual reality where words and consensus reign supreme. Even this forum, with a theme of spirituality, has over 300k posts. Do you have a guideline that informs others of how much talking is okay and what is too much? I am not an authority and do not want to become one. Therefore, I will not be issuing guidelines that must be followed. At most, I might make suggestions. Cannot a human directly experience talking, writing, listening, reading? This kind of question leads to endless philosophical discussion, an area that I loath to venture into.
|
|
|
Post by hicksetta on Feb 15, 2016 15:25:29 GMT -5
Hmmmm...I don't know what to say about this. What ever it is, it's...it's...some sort of...Itsy Bitsy Teenie Weenie... Caterina Valente - Itsy Bitsy Teenie Weenie Honolulu Strand Bikini (1960): www.youtube.com/watch?v=_SMU86DvrfU
|
|
Larry
New Member
Posts: 26
|
Post by Larry on Feb 15, 2016 16:24:48 GMT -5
Hmmmm...I don't know what to say about this. What ever it is, it's...it's...some sort of...Itsy Bitsy Teenie Weenie... Caterina Valente - Itsy Bitsy Teenie Weenie Honolulu Strand Bikini (1960): www.youtube.com/watch?v=_SMU86DvrfUhmmm....and in the original German, too
|
|
Larry
New Member
Posts: 26
|
Post by Larry on Feb 15, 2016 16:26:27 GMT -5
De nada, Anonji, it's my pleasure and my duty. I'm not through with your book yet. If you want me to, I can tell you what I think about it, when I'm done reading it. Sure, would like to hear your thoughts and reflections...
|
|